'Design for Scandal' did sound quite interesting and had potential to be great. The story was a nice idea, giving the impression that the film would be enjoyable even if there was the possibility of it being not particularly plausible. Rosalind Russell and Walter Pidgeon, heading a talented cast, showed themselves to be great in other things and had a lot of appeal to them. Norman Taurog was not the most consistent or greatest of directors, but some of his work has not been bad at all.
My thoughts on 'Design for Scandal' when seeing it was that it was a decent and enjoyable film with a good deal to like about it. Albeit also a bit disappointing and not one of the best representations of particularly an against-type Pidgeon, with the big amount of potential it had it did have a lot of room to be much better than it turned out to be. It is definitely worth a viewing but it is not one of those watch it over and over films, more a film to see once or twice.
As said, there is a good deal to like. The production values are glossy but in a way that is nostalgic and quite sumptuous. Taurog directs at a brisk pace, everything moving along crisply with little signs of letting up.
The script deftly balances romance and comedy. There is some clever witty dialogue that is genuinely funny in a gentle way without being over-engineered, the interplay between Russell does sparkle at its best. The romance is frothy but also sweet and charming. Russell is in a role that suits her to the ground and she does fabulously at being icy and sophisticated with great comic timing. The supporting cast are solid generally, Edward Arnold being a standout.
Pidgeon however disappoints. It was great that he tried to do something different to his usual roles at this point, but he seemed ill at ease with the comic timing not coming naturally to him and the role would have benefitted from being handled with a much lighter touch, here played too heavily and seriously. The characters have little depth to them and are little more than stereotypes that don't always add very much, wouldn't have said no to Jean Rogers being given more to do.
Was also not all that taken with the long tangled string of cliches story, which did tend to be somewhat far-fetched to credibility-straining effect (even when taking the film for what it's meant to be and trying to not expect too much from) and not always focused, the cliches mounting all the time with so much here having been done before and much better. While the pace has a lot of energy the film loses steam towards the end in momentum and focus, and as an overall whole the film is quite ordinary. Pleasant enough but part of me wanted to connect with it much more and wanted it to do much more with its material, done competently more often than not but with not much imagination.
In conclusion, enjoyable if a bit underwhelming. With more imagination and a better male lead (others have mentioned Cary Grant and he definitely would have been a much better choice) it would have been a lot better than it turned out. Worth seeing though to see Russell in her last film she made when under her MGM contract, another interest point. 6/10
My thoughts on 'Design for Scandal' when seeing it was that it was a decent and enjoyable film with a good deal to like about it. Albeit also a bit disappointing and not one of the best representations of particularly an against-type Pidgeon, with the big amount of potential it had it did have a lot of room to be much better than it turned out to be. It is definitely worth a viewing but it is not one of those watch it over and over films, more a film to see once or twice.
As said, there is a good deal to like. The production values are glossy but in a way that is nostalgic and quite sumptuous. Taurog directs at a brisk pace, everything moving along crisply with little signs of letting up.
The script deftly balances romance and comedy. There is some clever witty dialogue that is genuinely funny in a gentle way without being over-engineered, the interplay between Russell does sparkle at its best. The romance is frothy but also sweet and charming. Russell is in a role that suits her to the ground and she does fabulously at being icy and sophisticated with great comic timing. The supporting cast are solid generally, Edward Arnold being a standout.
Pidgeon however disappoints. It was great that he tried to do something different to his usual roles at this point, but he seemed ill at ease with the comic timing not coming naturally to him and the role would have benefitted from being handled with a much lighter touch, here played too heavily and seriously. The characters have little depth to them and are little more than stereotypes that don't always add very much, wouldn't have said no to Jean Rogers being given more to do.
Was also not all that taken with the long tangled string of cliches story, which did tend to be somewhat far-fetched to credibility-straining effect (even when taking the film for what it's meant to be and trying to not expect too much from) and not always focused, the cliches mounting all the time with so much here having been done before and much better. While the pace has a lot of energy the film loses steam towards the end in momentum and focus, and as an overall whole the film is quite ordinary. Pleasant enough but part of me wanted to connect with it much more and wanted it to do much more with its material, done competently more often than not but with not much imagination.
In conclusion, enjoyable if a bit underwhelming. With more imagination and a better male lead (others have mentioned Cary Grant and he definitely would have been a much better choice) it would have been a lot better than it turned out. Worth seeing though to see Russell in her last film she made when under her MGM contract, another interest point. 6/10