I am convinced than the novel of D. H. Lawrence deserved be not adaptated for cinema. Because, more than an adultery or the scenes of sex, it represents a provocative source of reflection for each of its readers.
But, sure, it is tempting to remind/ reinterprete the story of a sentimental trio , to show nice landscapes and clothes and to offer to new actors, the roles of characters.
And, yes, Richard Madden offeres a not bad oliver Mellers , not real faithfull to the novel, but interesting one.
A serious fist of cliches and a nice try to reflect a world . And the only real sin remains the too forced end.
But, sure, good intentions, familiar scenes, forced introduction of characters, gestures, attitudes, reactions, impression to be more an adaptation of Anna Karenina, a profound unrealistic and fake Mr. Chatterley and the useful kick to read, again, the novel.
But, sure, it is tempting to remind/ reinterprete the story of a sentimental trio , to show nice landscapes and clothes and to offer to new actors, the roles of characters.
And, yes, Richard Madden offeres a not bad oliver Mellers , not real faithfull to the novel, but interesting one.
A serious fist of cliches and a nice try to reflect a world . And the only real sin remains the too forced end.
But, sure, good intentions, familiar scenes, forced introduction of characters, gestures, attitudes, reactions, impression to be more an adaptation of Anna Karenina, a profound unrealistic and fake Mr. Chatterley and the useful kick to read, again, the novel.