I mean, what you're really getting is Siegler on Siegler, and she does not carry a show the way someone like Kenda could. Most folks who vie for the spotlight like she has can be pretty narcissistic and listening to an hour of that gets old fast... Siegler comes off as painfully ignorant at times; she's incredibly conservative and kind of ridiculous, like how she ignores the science behind why adolescents should not be tried as adults.
As far a true crime is concerned, it's just not interesting in the way any way that makes it worth watching... these crimes have been covered on other shows before, with better production, and either more involvement in explaining the crime - opportunity and motive - or the legal side of things, which this show just lacks.
I guess this would be great viewing if you're a boomer that needs to be hit over the head with repetitive crap and have your confirmation bias reflected back at you.
As far a true crime is concerned, it's just not interesting in the way any way that makes it worth watching... these crimes have been covered on other shows before, with better production, and either more involvement in explaining the crime - opportunity and motive - or the legal side of things, which this show just lacks.
I guess this would be great viewing if you're a boomer that needs to be hit over the head with repetitive crap and have your confirmation bias reflected back at you.