Chances (1931) Poster

(1931)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
another WWI love triangle
blanche-213 November 2006
Douglas Fairbanks Jr. and Anthony Bushell are the Prescott brothers in 1931's "Chances," and both are in love with the same woman, Molly (Rose Hobart). The two brothers go off to war while Molly does her part in the effort, Tom (Bushell) believing that Rose is waiting for him, while in fact, she loves Jack (Fairbanks Jr.) and only turned to Tom on the rebound. Jack and Molly meet while he is on leave, and when he returns to battle, he doesn't know how to handle the situation with his brother.

This is a very dated film done in that weird time that was the transition between silent and sound. This makes the dialogue pacing off and the film seem mannered and stagy. It's by no means a heavy look at war as some of the films made around the same time were, but rather focuses on the brothers' relationship and their mutual love for one woman. Fairbanks Jr. emerges as the best actor, giving a solid performance. Hobart is very serious and kind of boring, and Bushell is good-looking but callow. It's all very stiff upper lip and pip-pip.

"Chances" is a dark-looking film with some well-done battle scenes. One interesting bit of trivia about the cast is that all three leads lived to be 90 and above. One wonders if in later years, they even remembered this early effort.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Can You Kiss With a Stiff Upper Lip?
bkoganbing9 September 2005
We're so far removed at this point from the generation during an after World War I that a film like Chances is almost incomprehensible today. Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. and Anthony Bushell are the Ingleside brothers and both are soldiers, officers and gentlemen in the best British stiff upper lip tradition.

Anthony Bushell is in love with a childhood friend played by Rose Hobart and Fairbanks likes to play the field. Problem is that Hobart's decided she's got eyes only for Fairbanks and then Fairbanks realizes what's been blooming in his back yard.

If you're a fan of these kind of romantic films and knowing that the background is World War I, you know that the issue will be settled on the battlefield.

I don't like panning these kind of films because they do reflect their times and are done with great sincerity. The battle scenes are very nicely done by Warner Brothers. Nevertheless I'm not sure how today's audiences would take to something like this.

But I will say that Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. does show in abundance the style and charm that made him a star. It wasn't just on his famous father's name that he stayed a star.
18 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Borrows its story-line from Hell's Angels (1930), with Douglas Fairbanks, Jr.
jacobs-greenwood16 December 2016
Warning: Spoilers
Directed by Alan Dwan, with an adaptation by Waldemar Young, this slightly above average World War I drama borrows a romantic storyline from Hell's Angels (1930), that of two brothers, one carefree and one serious, who go off to fight in the same unit, while leaving behind a woman they both love. Douglas Fairbanks Jr. and Anthony Bushnell play the brothers, respectively, and Rose Hobart plays the woman who (like Jean Harlow) is initially the love interest of the serious brother, before she falls hard for the carefree one. Even the same brother dies in the end, though not by heroism and far less dramatically. The only real difference is that all three were childhood friends in this one; Bushnell and Hobart were close whereas Fairbanks Jr. was annoyed by her.

In 1914 London, where the inseparable brothers are going through training together, Fairbanks Jr. is captivated by a beautiful woman he meets in the fog, not realizing it's someone from his past until he and Bushnell return to their mother's (Mary Forbes) where Hobart is a guest. In a party sequence, (not entirely unlike the other film), Fairbanks Jr. wins over Hobart's until he learns of his brother's plan to marry her. He then uses another woman (Florence Britton, uncredited) to reestablish his playboy persona in front of Hobart, hoping she'll be satisfied with Bushnell.

Once the brothers are shipped off to war, Fairbanks Jr.'s character gets to perform admirably in battle, earning him a seven day leave. His brother asks him to find out why his would-be fiancée has stopped writing him. On his way through Calais, he runs into her, she's a driver now, and they declare their love for each other once again. Fairbanks Jr. urges her to write Bushnell of their love, then spends all but the last day of his leave with his mother. His last day is spend romantically with Hobart's character, who gives him a picture of herself with a loving inscription to "keep her close, so she can protect him".

Sometime after he returns, his brother learns the truth about who loves whom, through a misunderstanding with the aforementioned picture. Other than that, there's not much left besides some unspectacularly staged (when compared to The Big Parade (1925) or All Quite on the Western Front (1930)) ground battle sequences; of course it would be nearly impossible to top Hell's Angels (1930) aerial sequences. Holmes Herbert plays the brothers' commander; Edmond Breon a General, Harry Allen a Private.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Nicely done....
drednm20 May 2003
Douglas Fairbanks, Jr. is very good in this romance/war film, playing a man who loves his brother's fiancee. Good cinematography helps put a gossamer glow on this early talkie that also boasts good work by Rose Hobart and Anthony Bushell. It never gets sticky but still manages to show moving relationships between brothers and between Fairbanks (always underrated) and Hobart, who unaccountably sank quickly to second leads. The story may seem a tad dated now, but this old film is definitely worth a look. Mary Forbes is the mother, and I think Ethel Griffies plays the drunken flower seller.
22 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
young doug fairbanks junior
ksf-213 December 2022
21 year old douglas fairbanks jr, and very early roles for rose hobart and anthony bushell. Period piece, london 1914. When the ingleside brothers get a three day leave during the first world war, they fall for the same girl. At a dance, they both tell molly they love her. She seems to really be in love with one, but in the heat of war, people will say anything to get by. And molly didn't want to hurt either of them. The intrigue. Who will survive? Who will find love? Pretty simple story... and it's been remade several times. Smaller role for tyrell davis, who only acted in 38 films, but stole the scene in so many of them. Filmed in the glorious days between the two wars. Imdb tells us the beach scenes were filmed in oregon! Seems like a long way to go for one minute on the beach. Directed by allan dwan. It's pretty good. Interesting mostly because it's an early role for fairbanks junior. Side note...he was married to joanie crawford when he made this!
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A bit predictable but also very nice and very moving.
planktonrules31 March 2021
"Chances" is a story set during WWI and is about two brothers who fall for the same woman. It's a bit predictable but manages to overcome this and is a very entertaining film.

The story begins in 1914 and like so many naive people, Jack and Tom (Douglas Fairbanks Jr. And Anthony Bushell) are celebrating that they're going off to war. Little did folks at the time realize that the war would result in more than 20,000,000 deaths! Before going, Tom spends some time with his girlfriend (Rose Hobart) and then goes off to war. Little did Tom suspect that Jack also spent time with her and the pair fell in love. So, while Tom is anticipating marrying her, she is in love with his brother.

During the war, the brothers find it's not all fun and glory...in fact it completely sucks. But Jack is quite the hero and is rewarded with a leave to go home...where he picks up his relationship with Tom's girl. What's next? See the film.

This film was handled very deftly--with excellent direction, acting as well as some harrowing and realistic battle scenes. Well worth seeing and quite the tearjerker near the end.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
chances
mossgrymk28 March 2021
Decent WW1 battle scenes battle with some of the sappiest upper class, Brit romantic sludge this side of Barbara Cartland. It all adds up to a rather unmemorable movie. Solid C.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
An important look at WWI
todd-136-94178216 March 2021
An excellent look at WWI through the eyes of two brothers. Douglas Fairbanks gives an excellent performance opposite Anthony Bushnell and Mary Forbes.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One Weird Combination
tonstant viewer26 May 2003
This film is a weird hybrid of silent film and stage play, but it never quite manages to be a movie.

The battle scenes are impressively cinematic, well-staged and photographed in the D.W. Griffith mold, but what comes between them is very uneven.

The British accents come and go and the acting is stagy. Douglas Fairbanks Jr. is engaging as a rake at the beginning but can't encompass the deeper emotions towards the end. Rose Hobart is much better at playing resentment and bitterness than romance, which is my guess why she slid from lead to character woman so quickly. Anthony Bushell is a wet noodle as the stolid brother, which is probably right, but no fun to watch.

And what was this project doing at First National (Warners) anyway? Paramount or MGM could function well with a bunch of rowdy English aristocrats at play, but they might as well be moon-men to the studio home of Jimmy Cagney and Edward G. A tommy-gun or malicious half-grapefruit would have helped this film immensely.

So, interesting as an awkward curio, but constipated compared to the great silent WWI films like The Big Parade or What Price Glory? and clumsy compared to the great talkies that would accompany WWII.
12 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
My New Favorite Old Movie
samuelsrenee24 March 2024
Still watching this one after weeks of loving it... To start off I'll say I could have done without the drunken flower-seller in the Golden Lion and the seemingly meaningless 20 seconds of the German front. I can't judge the battle scenes because I find it so painful to watch horses in that situation in any film.

What I love are the romantic scenes with Doug Fairbanks Jr and Rose Hobart. She gets very little praise in the other reviews here, but I find her low-key presence and unglamorous facade quite appealing and so different from the overly made-up women in so many films.

Doug has so much star quality and glamor that I wonder his publicists didn't make more of him and help him get more money for his roles. But he seems to have gone out of his way to make sure they didn't associate him with his fabulously famous and talented father, so they must have erred in the other direction, not giving enough credit for his fabulous good looks and talent.

For those who love the gentility of kind family relationships and an old-fashioned style of romance, this is the film for them.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed