Home to Danger (1951) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
Nondescript thriller lifted by Fisher's quality direction
Leofwine_draca4 August 2016
HOME TO DANGER is one of Terence Fisher's most nondescript films as director. It's a low budget little thriller, set in and around a country house, that involves the death of a wealthy man and the reading of his will. His daughter inherits the estate and allows the owners of a small charity to live in the property with her, but somebody who is determined to get their hands on the wealth is willing to kill for it.

It's predictable and cheap-looking stuff indeed, and the most notable thing about the production is Fisher's direction, which makes the film look more expensive and stylish than it is. Otherwise the story plods along a bit and the performances are anything but invigorating. Rona Anderson has done better work elsewhere, Guy Rolfe feels somehow extraneous as the heroic character shoehorned into the plot, and only a youthful Stanley Baker really shines as the simple-minded manservant. I also found it hard to warm to a bunch of characters who took obvious delight in the killing of wildlife. The use of stirring music at the climax brings to mind the James Bernard score of Fisher's Dracula.
11 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Confusing Thriller
malcolmgsw17 December 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This is the type of thriller where the ends don't all join up.What we know for certain from the very beginning is that Alan Wheatley is the murderer,simply because this is the role that he plays in nearly every film.However what is not quite as clear is why he is doing in all and sundry.We have Stanley Baker in a very early role playing a servant who is prepared to go to any lengths to protect his mistress.However there are too many unanswered questions.Like what is funny old Peter Jones doing in a role of a hit-man.Why is Alan Wheatley the head of a children's charity and a drug dealer at the same time.I could raise many points like this but none have a satisfactory answer.Thankfully it only lasts just over an hour so not much chance of getting bored.
9 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"I thought you were going straight"
hwg1957-102-2657047 September 2017
Warning: Spoilers
A woman returns to England after the death of her father and inherits his property. There are however people who don't want her to inherit and attempts are made on her life. She and an old friend investigate and doubts are raised about her father's death and how drug selling may be involved. It is a moderate mystery with the main villain being obvious. The best scenes are probably the duck hunting expedition and the chasing of the said main villain at the end. Otherwise Terence Fisher directs in a pedestrian way.

Rona Anderson and Guy Rolfe as the main leads are given routine roles. More interesting are Peter Jones as a somewhat creepy Lips Leonard and the great Alan Wheatley as Hughes who quietly steals all the scenes he is in. Stanley Baker has a small part where he only has to look slightly mad but does it well enough. Dennis Harkin is amusing as Jimmy-The-One.

The music score is provided by Malcolm Arnold no less but is not as memorable as a lot of his many others.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Content wise, utterly formulaic b-pic crime filler stuff lifted above the mediocre by the legendary Terence Fisher.
jamesraeburn200317 May 2016
Warning: Spoilers
A young woman, Barbara (Rona Anderson), arrives in England on hearing the news that her wealthy businessman father has died - apparently committing suicide. At a shooting party on her country estate, a man is found murdered on the marshes. Barbara and her boyfriend, Robert (Guy Rolfe), turn detective believing the death to be connected with that of her father's. They open the safe at her father's office and learn that it is being used as a link in a dope racket. It becomes clear that her father found this out and was murdered by his business partner, Wainwright (Francis Lister), who was part of the gang. But, Wainwright's accomplice, is aware that the couple are on his tail and they are confronted by him alone in the country house at night...

Content wise, it is utterly formulaic British second feature stuff but under Terence Fisher's direction - an early film for him made about five years before he became a key creative figure in the British horror boom via Hammer - it is lifted from being a mediocre to a good film (for its kind). The scenes in and around Rona Anderson's country estate are especially effective with Reg Wyer's b/w lighting making them sinister and shivery. Rona Anderson and Guy Rolfe are cheerful and likable as the standard b-pic hero and heroine while Alan Wheatley is excellent as the head of the criminal gang working as the head of a widow and orphans charity as a cover. Look out for Stanley Baker too as a family servant who is determined to save Anderson from Wheatley's clutches. The film was produced by Lance Comfort who was a prolific second feature director throughout the 1950's and early 60's including such films as Eight O' Clock Walk, Tomorrow At Ten, Blind Corner and Pit Of Darkness.

Home To Danger is now available on DVD on Renown Pictures coupled with Montgomery Tully's espionage drama Master Spy.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Neat things in a tiny package.
mark.waltz22 May 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Another fast moving, action packed quota quickie, this crime drama deals with innocenr Rona Anderson, the heir to the estate of her father's old country house which leads her to be the target of killers due to what some criminal associates of her father were hiding inside. Anderson nearly becomes a victim several times, always aided by the presence of Stanley Baker, dim witted handyman who has lived at the estate since she was a child. At under 70 minutes, this never stops moving, but I thought that the last real stretch things out far too much and had some laughable moments where Anderson basically stood there as the killer approached. Surprisingly violent for a film of this era, it's a well filmed programmer, not without flaws but a passable time-filler with decent performances and lots of interesting supporting characters but surprisingly humorless.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
kind of a mess
blanche-27 August 2019
I love the British B noirs, but some of them are confusing - huge plot holes and a story that doesn't make sense.

A young woman, Barbara Cummings (Rona Anderson) comes back to the family estate after the suicide of her father - if that's what it was. When the will is read, she inherits everything rather than it going to his business partner, where it was supposed to go initially. It's suggested by the solicitor that she continue to help the children's charity -- her father has left it 500 pounds, and she suggests that part of her home can go to house children.

Well here's where it gets a little dicey. People are trying to kill her, having something to do with drugs. Somehow the head of this charity is involved. I admit I lost track. The business partner is involved as well, taking orders from someone who wants Barbara set up to be killed during a shooting party.

Terence Fisher was a marvelous director. He really paid his dues with this one.

Stanley Baker has a small part as a devoted albeit slow servant, and tall, distinguished Guy Rolfe is a family friend who has romantic designs on the heroine.

This is the type of thriller where the ends don't all join up.What we know for certain from the very beginning is that Alan Wheatley is the murderer,simply because this is the role that he plays in nearly every film.However what is not quite as clear is why he is doing in all and sundry.We have Stanley Baker in a very early role playing a servant who is prepared to go to any lengths to protect his mistress.However there are too many unanswered questions.Like what is funny old Peter Jones doing in a role of a hit-man.Why is Alan Wheatley the head of a children's charity and a drug dealer at the same time.I could raise many points like this but none have a satisfactory answer.Thankfully it only lasts just over an hour so not much chance of getting bored.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Tidy little thriller
dcole-226 September 2000
Warning: Spoilers
Well made little thriller with good performances. It's very well shot but has a few script problems (the villain has the heroine at gunpoint, doesn't shoot her, but shoots everyone around her..?). Still, very enjoyable and worth seeing. Director Terence Fisher does an admirable job.
26 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Weird murders going on in very fishy business
clanciai15 November 2018
It starts very innocently with no danger at all as there is only one old man dead by suicide, at it seems. Guy Rolfe is there to help the young heiress Barbara (Rona Anderson) who gradually appears as a target for someone who wants to kill her for some reason, but at the shooting party organised for her execution, someone mysteriously shoots the executioner, whom no one in the vicinity has ever seen before. The plot and the mystery thickens.

There is a backward boy at the stables who stammers and seems to generally falter in everything he does, but he knows something and sees what no one else sees and makes observations. This is perhaps the most important and interesting character in the film, and he will continue acquiring more importance to the bitter end, as more and more people get murdered one way or the other, and there are some very nice foggy London scenes at night when Rona and Guy break in to investigate some dark secrets. That's where the actual film and excitement starts, which then mercilessly will increase to the desperate end.

The backward groom with something of a zombie about him is actually Stanley Baker at an early stage. He remains the most fascinating character, nothing wrong about the others, they are all excellent on a small scale, but the plot gets more and more knotty as it develops. There is more than one murderer here, and they will all surprise you.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Agatha Christie mix
Goingbegging2 December 2013
If, like myself, you were just wanting a glimpse of Stanley Baker before he was famous, don't bother. The man is literally unrecognisable, both facially and in screen personality, playing a mentally sub-normal servant in an elegant country house. Unfortunately he doesn't carry much conviction in the role, and just trogs about like the Holy Fool with Frankenstein thrown in. The Baker we love to hate was still a year or two away.

You should remember that this was only a supporting feature, just over an hour long, and as such, it provides undemanding fare. Sixty years on, this is its charm, with every cliché in place, almost an Agatha Christie story, with a shooting-party, the regulation retired major, some deferential police, and an upper-class smoothie (Guy Rolfe) squiring an impossibly beautiful Rona Anderson as the heiress whose new fortune has suddenly put her life in danger. All flavoured with the blend of cut-glass English and Shepperton cockney, without which no 1951 thriller was complete.

Alan Wheatley is just a little too unctuous as the boss of a children's charity, so we're not exactly unprepared for trouble in paradise. Terence Fisher's direction was generally praised, though it didn't really need that opening scene at the airport to establish that the young lady was returning from abroad. And Francis Lister fans may be interested to catch him here in his last film, still on fine form.
11 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A twisted tale of greatly nefarious duplicity,delightfully despicable, moustache-twirling villainy!
Weirdling_Wolf19 October 2021
The fifties seemed to be a propitious decade for entertaining British crime thrillers, and the briskly-paced 'Home to Danger' is a more than adequate time waster, and for Guy Rolfe fans it's an especially piquant treat, as he is on deliciously dashing form as the suave Robert Irving who heroically assists the beautifully distressed damsel Barbara Cummings (Rona Anderson) in her increasingly dangerous quest to discover the rather sinister truth behind her father's apparently motiveless suicide, as not too long after the reading of the will, the tenacious duo of Barbara and Robert dizzyingly find themselves murkily embroiled in a delightfully twisted tale of greatly nefarious duplicity, murderously inclined dope-fiends, and one diabolically despicable, moustache-twirling villain leaves little room for tedium in the iconic Hammer Films director's frequently rollicking, enjoyably old fashioned murder mystery, with tall, debonair matinee idol guy Rolfe making for a withering handsome, stoically sleuthing, straight-shooting hero, and it would be enormously remiss of me to omit the fine character work by future British acting icon Stanley Baker.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Danger to home.
DoorsofDylan28 August 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Finding Distant Trumpet (also reviewed) to be a plodding mess, I began searching on Talking Pictures free catch-up site for other, hopefully better movies from film maker Terence Fisher. Discovering one pre-Hammer Horror title by Fisher on the site, I got set to go home.

View on the film:

Highlighted in the splendid book Terence Fisher Master of Gothic Cinema by Tony Dalton that after his contract ended once Gainsborough Pictures was sold to Rank, this film was the first, of what was to become a long period of him working for independent studios, directing auteur Terence Fisher surrounds the family manor house with a Gothic Thriller atmosphere, via Fisher & The Man In The Back Seat (1961-also reviewed) cinematographer Reginald H. Wyer walking through the long shadows and thick clouds of smoke (a major recurring motif in Fisher's works) and an excellent ominous score from The Night My Number Came Up (1955-also reviewed) composer Malcolm Arnold, towards ultra-stylized first-person shots capturing Barbara getting in the cross-hairs of those who don't want her to uncover the household secret.

Fisher skillfully explores the house with proto- jump scare push-ins and zoom-ins on hands (which cast long shadows on the walls) bursting out of the darkness to strangle Barbara and anyone feared to be offering clues,until Fisher gloriously sinks the hands, and the household, into wide-shots covering every inch of the surrounding marshes.

Bringing Barbara back home for a reading of the will with her family, the screenplay by Francis Edge (who also edited the film), Ian Stuart Black and John Temple-Smith get the knives out for Barbara, (played by Rona Anderson, who wonderfully expresses the lingering doubt Barbara has over the "suicide" it is claimed by the family that her dad committed) by drawing family members, household servants and friends (played by a terrific ensemble cast of Peter Jones,Stanley Baker and Alan Wheatley) as people who would very much like Barbara to take the claimed suicide of her dad at face value, leading to the writers lining the dark walls of the manor house with tense underworld crime dealings taking place under the upper-crust facade, which Barbara shines a light on, to discover the dangers at home.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed