The Hills Have Eyes Part II (1984) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
80 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
5/10
The one with the dog flashback.
BA_Harrison3 July 2013
I've read that Wes Craven made this belated sequel to his classic The Hills Have Eyes because he was desperate for work, and that things didn't go quite as planned due to the producers withholding funds; I'm not surprised that he's making excuses, because compared to the original, this is laughable stuff—a formulaic slasher that is so poorly conceived that, at times, it almost feels like a comedy.

On the flip side, I never found it boring (despite numerous flashbacks to the first film, including one from a dog!): the action moves along at a reasonable lick with some fun kills, a few reasonable scares, a bit of gore (including a juicy throat slash), and some gratuitous female nudity (somehow, despite the film being set in a desert, Wes still manages to shoehorn in a shower scene).

Part II ends in a suitably daft manner with the survivors successfully defeating the final member of the film's cannibal clan by devising a trap and finding the necessary equipment in mere seconds, and then carrying out their plan without a hitch, despite the whole idea being silly in the extreme.

I give the film a rating of 5/10: there are far worse slashers out there.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Revenge of the 80's: The Sequel!
Captain_Couth18 August 2005
The Hills Have Eyes Part 2 (1985) was a unwarranted sequel. But after all this was the eighties and sequels were in vogue. The first film had a fine closure and I still don't understand what was Wes Craven thinking when he released it? It was far too tamed to be an R-Rated film and it wasn't a true sequel (in my opinion). Too far fetched and inane. I wasn't pleased with the end results. I'll just pretend it never took place.

Not a bad movie but certainly not a good one either. A mediocre effort of Wes Craven. You could tell his heart wasn't in this project. But I would take one of these films any day compared ti the rubbish he's cranking out these day.

An okay time waster. Not a total disaster that some people might make you believe it is!
5 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Sequel That Should Have Not Been Made
claudio_carvalho10 July 2020
"The Hills Have Eyes" (1977) is a film still impressive and not dated in the present days. The violence in the world in 1977 cannot be compared with the violence in our days; therefore, it might have shocked the viewers that had the chance to see this film in those years.

The sequel "The Hills Have Eyes Part II" is a stupid and disappointing film that should have not been made. The characters are so imbecile that the viewer hope that they are killed by the sick locals. The only exceptions are the dog Beast, the blind Cass and Ruby that is wasted in this sequel. Robert Houston was probably ashamed to destroy his character Bobby and has only a cameo in this forgettable film. My vote is four.

Title (Brazil): "Quadrilha de Sádicos 2" ("Sadistic Gang 2")
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
"...the hills still have eyes."
Backlash00715 September 2003
The Hills Have Eyes Part II is Wes Craven's less than great follow-up to the brutal original. The first film is damn near terrifying in parts. This one is slightly goofy and unbelievable. The flashbacks are my main problem with the film. Everyone has flashbacks. Every single character from the original has flashbacks, the freakin' dog even has flashbacks. If you're watching The Hills Have Eyes Part II, you almost have to be a fan. I think we're all familiar with the first one. If you're not, then you shouldn't be viewing it. Any reality or spontaneity is also gone. You know who is going to die right away. The cast is decent though. Michael Berryman, Robert Houston, and Janus Blythe all return. Kevin Blair from Friday the 13th Part 7 and Peter Frechette from The Kindred play moto-cros bikers while Nicholas Worth plays the voice of the Reaper. And can anyone tell me where the Reaper was hiding in the first film? If you didn't enjoy the first Hills Have Eyes, you aint gonna like this one.

Note for genre buffs: Kane Hodder is listed as a stuntman.
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Dull, stupid, lazy, bloodless, "will this do?" rubbish AVOID!!
gillman1125 June 2004
Warning: Spoilers
THERE MAY BE SPOILERS BUT YOU SHOULDN'T EVEN BE CONSIDERING WATCHING THIS MOVIE.

On the face of it this was a fairly tempting no brainer movie – the premise of the overrated (but not bad) original pasted onto the eighties slasher movie template – a touch of continuation with the Bobby, one of the survivors and Ruby, the feral girl (and the family dog, who gets his own flashback – draw your own conclusions!) from the original and the promise of much inspired teenager-slashing in the desert.

They are hooked up with some motocross riders and their girlfriends (one of the girls is blind and has Daredevil like enhanced senses – I am not making this up) and heading to a meet in some unspecified place to test out Bobby's newly developed super-fuel (they're carrying gallons of the stuff – deus ex machina alert!)

The kids decide to leave the highway and head across country thanks to one of the stupidest plot contrivances in cinematic history – they forget that the clocks went forward the night before – all of them!! This happened about twenty minutes in and I kept watching!!! More fool, me.

From there on its the usual predictable nonsense and features Michael Berryman (with a REAL tenuous explanation of his survival from part one) and a super lame villain (its Jupiter's brother!!) who looks like a retired wrestler with a big fat gut (y'know – he's fat – just run away!!)

None of this should be completely damning – there are a million pointless, predictable slasher flicks but some of them actually have a touch of originality – even if its only in the way the cast are killed off.

Boy does this movie fail – did Craven just take the budget and spend it on drugs? At least fifteen minutes of its overlong eighty six are taken up with flashbacks from the original (and not even the good bits from the original!) – the killings are bloodless and stupid and the killers are about as menacing as a drunk uncle at Christmas. And don't get me started on the ending...

This is the kind of dull, lazy, artless, stupid, `will this do?' filmmaking that gives horror cinema its bad name. It isn't even entertainingly bad – its just bad and should be in IMDB's 100 worst.

Pointless – avoid. You have been warned. 1 out of 10 only cos theres no zero option.
11 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
it's a groan-worthy bad sequel.
Nightman851 January 2006
A group of annoying bikers get stuck in the dessert and fall victim to the remaining members of the savage killers.

As good as Wes Craven's original film The Hill Have Eyes (1977) was, this sloppy sequel is as bad! It's dismayingly routine, with very few remotely interesting characters. This sequel just lapses into clichéd, uninspired slasher garbage, and pretty much lacks everything that made the original film a cult classic. You know a sequel is bad when the only good scenes in it are the flash-backs to the original film! The only bright spot is a decent music score from Harry Manfredini.

Robert Houston, Michael Berryman, and Janus Blythe return as their original characters, but it's all in vain.

Hands-down Craven's worst film.

BOMB out of ****
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Yeah, it was bad
Smells_Like_Cheese3 November 2007
I couldn't believe my eyes when I saw The Hills Have Eyes Part II at Blockbuster, I didn't even know that Wes had created a sequel from his brilliant classic. My boyfriend and I didn't even hesitate to pick it up, we thought it was going to be another awesome fright fest of the blood thirsty cannibals with probably better effects since Wes had pretty much made good money at that point and also established himself as a great film maker at that point. So we watched it last night with the lights off and you know what happened after the movie was over? We just looked at each other with the most blank stare as if we just saw a car accident. The Hills Have Eyes Part II was just a poorly made film and Wes should be ashamed of himself for ever thinking that this would have been a good movie. The characters were just ridicules and not to mention that he brought back characters that either died in the first film or would have no purpose in this sequel. Not to mention the characters from the first film have flashbacks from the first Hills have Eyes movie, but also the dog has a flashback as well! This story was just a bomb.

We have a group of teenage friends on a bus just going across the country, one of the girls happens to be Ruby, the little cannibal girl from the first film that saved the baby, somehow she's established herself into a model citizen that has a bubble gum personality, until she bumps into her old relatives at the same site with the group. That's right, they're all at the same site and now they are invited to dinner, where I'm sure they'll be the guests of honor.

The Hills Have Eyes Part II was really pathetic and low, not to mention beyond unbelievable. They didn't explain some of the deaths, they never explained what happened to the rest of the family from the first film, we only see the brother, and he has a pointless role because you don't see him for the rest of the film. Also of course some how the blind girl manages to save the day... I just, I can't, I'm sorry, I just really hated this film. I can't believe Wes did this to his own classic tale, just please do yourself a favor, stay as far away from this film as you can, it's no wonder I didn't hear of it, probably people don't wanna think that it ever happened.

1/10
8 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
The Cravens Have Bills To Pay: Part Dud
capkronos16 September 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Apparently desperately in need of money during his pre-Elm Street days, Craven agreed to write and direct this unnecessary follow-up to his 1977 cult success. After filming most - but not all - of the original script, the backers reneged and pulled funding before it could be completed, leaving the unfinished film to languish on a shelf somewhere for a spell. It wasn't until after Elm Street's success that the studio convinced Craven to finally finish it. And no, he wasn't given money to shoot the rest of the footage, he was simply left with the task of piecing together what WAS shot and then padding the rest out with "flashback" footage from the first. To tie it to the original, several cast members return to reprise their roles and the same basic premise and desert setting are retained, but the tone and the approach to the material is quite different this time out. In fact, it's almost impossible to believe the same man could possibly be responsible for both films. This sequel seems more like a second-rate cash-in made by an inept, inexperienced hack attempting to capitalize on the first film's success than an already-established filmmaker. It's no wonder Craven later disowned this film.

After the opening credit scroll informs us that "The following film is based on fact" (lol, please), we briefly catch up with original "Hills" survivor Bobby Carter (Robert Houston). Still traumatized by the events of the first movie, Bobby finds himself unable to accompany his buddies across the desert to a motocross competition to test out their new "Super Formula Racing Fuel." Going in his place is his friend Rachel (Janus Blythe), who, as "Ruby," was a member of the desert-dwelling family of the first film but is now a reformed ex-cannibal after having helped the Carter family put an end to her brood's murderous ways. Or so she thinks. Along with three racers, a mechanic, a few girlfriends and "Beast," the same German Shepherd from the first movie (don't ask), Rachel / Ruby soon finds herself back in familiar territory. Running short on time, the crew decide to venture off the main road and take a shortcut, their bus breaks down near an abandoned mine and then the rest plays out like business as usual as Pluto (Michael Berryman) and Papa Jupiter's hereunto unmentioned big brother "The Reaper" (John Bloom) start picking them off one by one.

Gone is the original film's intelligent subtext centered around two vastly different families clashing over harsh terrain and an ordinary, mild-mannered middle-class family forced to turn as vicious as their attackers in order to protect themselves. In its place we get a handful of obnoxious, ill-defined cardboard teenagers no one could possibly give two hoots about. While the first film was a tense, bleak survival film, this one is presented just like any number of other poorly-made slasher flicks with characters who continually do senseless and idiotic things, pitiful attempts at comedy and terrible dialogue ("You're not feeling psychic again are you like you sometimes do?"). The slasher feel is reinforced further by Harry Manfredini's rehashed music, which is nothing more than recycled bits and pieces from the Friday THE 13TH series. I could even live with all that, but this film is genuinely inept and filled with continuity errors and lapses in basic logic. It's almost mind-numbingly stupid... and the absurd moment the dog has his own flashback is really just the tip of the iceberg!

Early on, Rachel has a run-in with Pluto and uses karate (!) to defend herself. Immediately afterward she's shown laughing and joking along with the rest of the cast and accusing two guys who have disappeared of "playing pranks too hard" instead of, you know, putting two and two together they may have been killed by the psycho cannibal who'd just attacked her moments earlier. After she leaves the teens in her charge to go look around, they proceed to joke, play pranks on each other and and idiotically wander off by themselves so they can get killed. The movie probably reaches its low point when one of the cannibals steals a motorcycle, slaps on a helmet and starts driving around the rock cliffs while laughing maniacally. I wasn't even sure if this was supposed to be funny or not.

The murders themselves are rather tame. Someone's crushed by rocks and there are a couple of booby traps but most are just yanked off-screen and then found dead later on. The only gory moment is when one of the girls gets her throat cut and even that's not much. For what it's worth, our heroine (Tamara Stafford) ends up being a blind girl who has some kind of extrasensory perception, though the script doesn't really make novel use of that idea. The only thing this really has going for it are some nice-looking outdoor shooting locations and the underground lair the last few scenes take place in. Other than that, it's terrible.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Disposable Wes Craven
gavin694213 February 2013
A group of bikers, which includes some of the survivors from the original film, embark on a journey by bus to a biker race near the desert of the infamous incidents. However, because of a mistake they are late and decide to take a shortcut through the desert.

So, allegedly Wes Craven disowned this movie, claiming he only made it for the money. Sounds plausible. Unlike "Nightmare on Elm Street", "Hills" was not a film that needed a sequel. (Somehow, we have since ended up with a remake and sequel...) On the plus side, we have horror icon Michael Berryman, and Kevin Spirtas (who is better known to horror fans for "Friday the 13th Part VII"). So, while this is a pretty poor excuse for a horror film, it at least has a few familiar faces.

In 2019, Arrow Video released a special edition Blu-ray. It's a bit light on the features. There is a making-of documentary, but the audio commentary is provided by "The Hysteria Continues." For obvious reasons they could not get Craven to do it, but certainly there could have been some actor(s). Glad to see the special treatment, but this does not make it a better film.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A mess of flashbacks
Isau15 January 2003
I rented this film on accident; I thought I was renting The Hills Have Eyes part 1. That didn't turn out to matter though, because nearly the entire contents of the first film have been conveniently spliced in to this flick. A double feature? More like ninth circle of flashback hell.

Now, film-hounds will tell you that the flashback is a weak cinematic technique but that a skilled director can sometimes pull it off. These people assumed the dreamer was bipedal. When a DOG starts having flashbacks... My God. I was so young.

My rating: 2/10. A documentary, perhaps, on how a horror films can go wrong, akin to the "Teenagers: Don't Drink and Drive" flicks shown at some high schools. Avoid.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A sad state of affairs
BandSAboutMovies6 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Seven years after the original film, Wes Craven would return to the desert, bringing more folks back into the near apocalyptic territory lorded over by the mutants from the first film. In fact, if you liked that movie, you're in luck, because clips from it play throughout this one's running time.

Wes Craven has disowned this movie, which started filming A Nightmare On Elm Street. Though it was released after that film, only two-thirds of it was finished when the studio halted production due to budget issues. Once Freddy Krueger became a household name, that convinced Craven to finish the movie using only the footage that he had in the can. That's why so much of this film comes from the original, a point I will continually bludgeon throughout this article.

Robert Huston, who played Bobby in the original (and brought Lone Wolf and Cub to American screens) returns, as does Janus Blythe (she's also great in Eaten Alive). She was Rachel in the first film and now everyone calls her Ruby. They now own a motocross team and have invented a super fuel. The team's latest race takes them through the same stretch as...yes, I know I keep saying the original film, but this movie keeps referencing it.

Bobby's psychiatrist wants him to go, but he chickens out with Rachel taking his place along with Beast the dog. Yes, from the first film.

The team - blind Cass (who brings a blind girl motocross racing?), her boyfriend Roy (Kevin Spritas from the Subspecies films and Friday the 13th Part VII: The New Blood), Harry (Peter Frechette, The Kindred, The Unholy and T-Bird Louis DiMucci in Grease 2), Hulk(John Laughlin, Footloose and The Rock), Foster (Willard E. Pugh, Harpo from The Color Purple), Jane (Colleen Riley, Deadly Blessing) and Sue (Penny Johnson from TV's Castle and 24) - head off to the desert but get lost.

Harry takes a shortcut through an old bombing range, which Ruby should have protested way more than she does. This leads them to a mining ranch where Pluto (Michael Berryman) comes back - yes, from the first movie - and attacks her. Everyone thinks she's crazy until he also steals one of their bikes. Roy and Harry give chase but Harry gets killed by a boulder and a new cannibal named Reaper (John Bloom - who isn't Joe Bob - the Frankenstein's Monster from Al Adamson's Dracula vs. Frankenstein) knocks out Roy.

Reaper is Papa Jupiter's older brother and he isn't here to mess around. Seriously, he wipes out everyone - including Ruby or Rachel or whatever she was calling herself these days - in short order, using spearguns, machetes and improvised traps. However, Craven didn't like John Bloom's voice, so he's dubbed by Nicholas Worth, who we all know as Kirk Smith from Don't Answer the Phone!

Sadly for Pluto, he's still no match for a dog and gets dropped off a cliff.

The end of the film gets pretty thrilling, as the survivors use the bus itself as a trap for the gigantic mutant leader. There's an amazing fire stunt at the end, which made me really happy. And hey - Kane Hodder was one of the stunt people for this!
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A good sequel to The Hills Have Eyes
Rautus11 February 2007
I thought The Hills Have Eyes Part II was a good sequel by Wes Craven even though he said he only made it because he was low on cash and would of directed "Godzilla in Paris" but he decided to make a sequel to one of his best films.

I didn't think the flashbacks took up the whole film just the beginning and the dog flashback didn't bother me I thought it was quite funny.

The music was similar to Friday the 13th since it was the same man and I liked that since I'm a fan of Friday the 13th. The movie was more of a slasher film than what the first film was but the 80's was the slasher craze. But I liked it still.

A sequel that may not be as good as the first but is still a good movie. 9/10.
8 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
It's unoriginal and sometimes cheesy, but it's still fun!
BrianCTyler17 April 2006
THE HILLS HAVE EYES PART II (1985)

directed by: Wes Craven

starring: Tamara Stafford, Kevin Blair, Janus Blythe, and Michael Berryman

plot: Bobby (Robert Houston) and Ruby (Janus Blythe), now civilized and under the alias Rachel, run a motorcycle racing team and are preparing for a race in the desert. Bobby chickens out, leaving Ruby in charge. On the way, the group gets lost and must take a shortcut close to where the original horrors took place. They decide to stay for the night, which is a bad idea, because Ruby's brother Pluto (Michael Berryman) and uncle Reaper (John Bloom) roam the area, picking off the friends one by one. Soon, only a few survivors are left - including blind Cass (Tamara Stafford) and Ruby, and they must try to stay alive.

my thoughts: I've heard so many bad reviews about this film. I heard it was the worst sequel ever, and that it was mostly just a bunch of flashbacks from the original.

I finally got my hands on it and watched it with an open mind. I was not disappointed at all.

The flashbacks are only within the first 20 minutes. Bobby flashes back to his and Brenda's final battle with Jupiter, Ruby flashes back to helping Doug fight Mars and save the baby, and even the dog (Beast) flashes back to when he attacked the crap out of Pluto. Once the action begins, the flashbacks end. And the dog flash back did not bother me at all, I found it very cute.

The characters are your usual 80's teens. Some are annoying, but I did like a few - Cass (Tamara Stafford), Roy (Kevin Blair), and Hulk (John Laughlin) were very sympathetic. The others were either annoying or not interesting at all. The return of Ruby and Bobby was also a good idea. I loved watching Ruby seek redemption by saving the others, and Bobby has a small but smart part. It's nice to actually see a character that is smart and stays behind.

Michael Berryman returning as Pluto had it's pros and cons. I loved seeing his conflict with the dog Beast, but I also hated how in the original he was very menacing and creepy, here he is comic relief. At least The Reaper (John Bloom) was a big, strong, savage villain who didn't talk too much.

If you can ignore the unoriginality and the cheesiness of it all, then sit back and enjoy THE HILLS HAVE EYES PART II.
28 out of 37 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lower Quality Sequel
ryan-1007527 January 2021
Supposedly Wes Craven needed money. So, he figured why not milk my biggest bread winner in THE HILLS HAVE EYES. Which is really too bad, because Craven is a much better director and writer than what we are given here in this sorry sequel.

Bobby (Robert Houston) who survived the attacks in the original is dealing with that aftermath and seeing a shrink. Going with a team to race in that very desert where those horrors took place seven years prior. But, right when they are ready to leave Bobby backs out. And, crazily that is it for his character. He never shows back up again. Why was Bobby even in this movie? After leaving behind I think a much needed character in steps Janus Blythe as Ruby...er...Rachel now that she is with normal society. The team also picks up Beast the dog from the original and off they go to the desert. The bus then runs out of gas due to a ripped fuel line and they are stranded. Pluto (Michael Berryman) is back, which you would think is an asset, but his character really just gives way to the new villain The Reaper (John Bloom).

If you ever wanted to see a sequel without seeing the original this might be it. There are just way too many flashbacks to the better original that you realize this is Craven just padding out this movie. Like the original this one has bad lighting as well where you can not exactly tell what is going on. Finally the music by Harry Manfredini (which in fact is a plus to the film) helps in this regard, but seems like Craven made this for undemanding FRIDAY THE 13TH fans.

I'm sure Craven was not pleased with this film at all and to me I could see a directing improvement as each film was made by him. Then he made this stinker and incredibly it was followed up by perhaps his greatest film A NIGHTMARE ON ELM STREET made that same year. I would suggest just to watch the original.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
What on earth is this?
G.Spider14 June 1999
Wes Craven admitted in an interview that he needed to make some cash fast, would have happily 'directed Godzilla in Paris'. So he made a sequel to one of his well-made and enjoyable films.

However, 'Hills Have Eyes 2' is a letdown. It seems to rely heavily on flashbacks to the previous (superior) film and is really nothing more than a 'Friday the 13th' clone. It even has the same composer as the Jason films (Harry Manfredini) so much of the music in 'Hills 2' could make you think you're watching a 'Friday the 13th' sequel. This whole film is just a waste of time. The characters are so obnoxious you don't give a hoot what happens to them, the 'Papa Jupe's brother' business is glaringly contrived and unlikely and to cut a long story short I have trouble believing that this mess was by the same director who brought us the best of the 'Nightmare on Elm Street' films and 'Shocker'.
20 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The first a classic....this one a snooze fest!
charliesamuelhill17 April 2021
Don't get me wrong the first hills have eyes is a classic and goes down as one of the best horror films ever imo, but boy does this one stink. It's so boring. For a purist watch it and you'll know where I'm coming from but if your not bothered then I say give it a miss! The only reason this stinks is because Wes Craven wasn't given a big enough budget for it to work the way he wanted. It's a shame it really is.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
This movie should have never been made.
G00fhunter25 August 2021
This movie was almost a complete waste of time. I liked the first The Hills Have Eyes, but the second was unnessary. I do not like the characters or the plot in this film. At least there were some dog flashbacks and killings that saved this from being a 1 star film.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Be careful, people who live this far out usually have a reason." Not brilliant but I didn't think it was too bad actually.
poolandrews30 August 2005
Warning: Spoilers
The Hills Have Eyes Part II starts with Bobby (Robert Houston returning from the original) having a session with a psychiatrist (David Nichols) as he is still haunted by the events of 8 years earlier. Since those events Bobby has created a brand new type of fuel named 'Super Formula' that he & some friends are going to test out in the desert in a dirt-bike race. However he gets cold feet & decides to stay behind, so it's down to riders Roy (Kevin Spirtas as Kevin Blair) his blind girlfriend Cass (Tamara Stafford), Harry (Peter Frechette) who turns out to be the practical joker, Hulk (John Laughlin), the mechanic Foster (Willard E. Pugh) & his girlfriend Sue (Penny Johnson) who also double us as the obligatory token black characters & finally Bobby's friend Rachel (Janus Blythe, another returnee from the original) who was Ruby from the first film but has now turned civilised to drive out deep into the desert for the race. Unfortunately after a mix-up with the time it appears that they won't make the start in time, in time that is unless they take a shortcut across the open desert where they damage their bus & become stranded at a abandoned house. It's not long before they come under attack from more cannibal cavemen including Pluto (Michael Berryman) who actually survived the original after all... Written & directed by Wes Craven this sequel to his original The Hills Have Eyes (1977) is probably not as good & has a bad reputation but despite this I actually found it an alright way to pass 85 minutes. The script has a decent set-up, I surprisingly quite liked the characters even if they were stereotypes & I thought it moved along at a fair pace. The one thing I didn't like about The Hills have Eyes Part II is the slow middle section which started to drag after a promising set-up & not a lot of thought was put into it's reasoning. It descends into standard slasher film mode towards the end but I thought it handled itself reasonably well although it could have done with a slightly better bad guy rather than an ugly fat drunk looking bloke who can't even run properly. I personally don't think the flashbacks from the original harm The Hills Have Eyes Part II much, they are few in number & are all over before the halfway mark despite what you may have read elsewhere. Director Craven manages to create some decent scenes & good atmosphere which he is aided immensely by the Californian desert locations as they add a unique picturesque bleakness & beauty to the film & make for a perfect isolated location that many horror films rely on. The cinematography by David Lewis capture these locations pretty well & as a whole The Hills Have Eyes Part II is well made with some OK bike stunts & considering it supposedly only had a budget of $1,000,000 I didn't think it turned out so bad. The gore is somewhat tame but more plentiful than the original, someone is impaled, there is a slit throat, some severed limbs & dead bodies & a hatchet stuck in someone's head. The acting is OK for what it's worth, which isn't much. While I can't say The Hills Have Eyes Part II is a particularly good film I can't say it's a bad one either, I found it quite watchable & to an extent entertaining. If your stuck for something to watch for 85 minutes than I think you could do a lot worse than this, worth a watch at least.
3 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
i'll spoil this movie 4 u
moviefreak37233327 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
If you are as curious about this movie as I was I would highly recommend not wasting you're time, it kinda sucked. So instead of wasting you're time looking for it i'll save you 87 minutes by spoiling this movie completely.

PART 1 A group of stupid bikers get ready to go into the the desert for a motocross competition, oh yeah one of them is blind. Bobby has a bunch of flashbacks and Ruby is now known as Rachel (she is now sibilized and pretty much normal other than THE FRIGGIN FLASHBACKS!

PART 2 The kids make there way into the desert and there bus breaks down (duh duh duhhhhhhhhhhhhh) After realizing there pretty much f***ed they decide to look around. Thats when Ruby gets attacked by Pluto and kicks his a**. She then claims to the kids that she is the now legendary Ruby.Pluto takes off on one of the bikes. Two of the idiots go catch him, they catch him he surrenders. But one of the kids falls into one of the family's traps and is killed by the reaper (papa jupes big bro.).

PART 3 3 more kids are killed and ruby hits her head on a rock (you never find out what happened to her) The blind chick and one other survivor burn the reaper to death. Feel free to email me at moviefreak372333@yahoo.com
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
A mess of flashbacks
Isau16 January 2003
I rented this film on accident; I thought I was renting The Hills Have Eyes part 1. That didn't turn out to matter though, because nearly the entire contents of the first film have been conveniently spliced in to this flick. A double feature? More like ninth circle of flashback hell.

Now, film-hounds will tell you that the flashback is a weak cinematic technique but that a skilled director can sometimes pull it off. These people assumed the dreamer was bipedal. When a DOG starts having flashbacks... My God. I was so young.

My rating: 2/10. A documentary, perhaps, on how a horror films can go wrong, akin to the "Teenagers: Don't Drink and Drive" flicks shown at some high schools. Avoid.
2 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Terribly falls off of it's Original
tequila10127 December 2010
Terrible, terrible and terrible, Wes, what the heck. I love all of Wes Craven's films but this was just terrible. Like I have mentioned by my summary it falls off of the original in many ways. Looking at it now, there was no need for this stupid and pointless sequel.

The acting is OK but the characters are dumb, Pluto is not scary, the other cannibal is not convincing, the story is just muddled and goes down hill as it continuous on, the music gets lame, the deaths are done in the worse way possible and why have we got flashbacks from the first film??? Is this supposed to cover up on how crap it is already.

I know I'm bashing on this film rapidly but this was just cheap and disrespectful for how Suspenseful and,... how much of a masterpiece the 1977 film is.

People complain about how terrible other horror films such as: "Seed of Chucky", "Friday the 13th Remake", "Fthe13th Pt. 8". I have seen so many crappy horror films like "Day of the Dead Remake", "Jason Goes 2 Hell" and many more but this was just poor. And i thought those films where bad.

Most of Wes Craven's films are suspenseful, full of scares and absolutely excellent no matter how old they get, but this film (in my book) won't ever be remembered.

I don't give this a 5, 4 or 3 out of 10. I give it a 2/10.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Lame, long-shelved follow up
Zbigniew_Krycsiwiki9 June 2017
Lame follow up features several lengthy flashback sequences to pad out the film's run time to barely 90 minutes ( 85 minutes, without the opening narrative, and closing credits )

A group of dirt-bike racing morons (using some type of experimental gasoline created by survivor of the first film, for his obligatory cameo) take a shortcut through the desert, on their way to a motor-cross competition in the desert. When their bus breaks down, they end up in the same area where the first film took place, and are set upon by two survivors of the cannibal family from the earlier film.

I do not believe this ever had any type of proper film score written and recorded for it. It genuinely sounds like they just simply bought the soundtrack albums to the first few Friday the 13th films, and dubbed that in. I don't mean that it sounds similar, or it sounds like someone re- recorded the score. No, I mean that it sounds identical, like we're watching this movie while the Friday the 13th soundtrack album is playing in the background.

I don't have the same hatred for this film that a lot of fans of the original have. It isn't as great as the original, but it's also not quite as bad as some reviewers have said. It's just completely mediocre. The neolithic looking desert is still creepy as hell, a foot chase through the rocky cliffs between a couple of the bikers and Pluto is good also, and a couple of other good scenes are scattered throughout, but that can't hide the fact that, for all its explosions and chases, there's really just not a lot going on here, and there is surprisingly little tension or bloodshed. This film's naming The Reaper as the mutants' father contradicts the first film entirety, ( Papa Jupiter was their father in the original )
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
More flashbacks than the first
GOWBTW5 September 2020
Who would have known that there was a sequel to the first HHE film? There were some survivors of the first film, both good and bad. Michael Berryman returns to reprise his role. The son of the family who was traumatized by the experience returned. This time, it's a group of dirt bike racers that were participating in a race. They have one of the members of the team who was blind. They also have a dog, like the family who made the wrong turn on the trip. The group was diverse, and they were trying to test the super fuel they were about to use. The surviving freaks from the first film returned to wreak havoc on the new victims. I'm tired of hearing about the negative responses of this film. It's a slight touch of reminisce about the first experience of the tragedy and it opens up a new scar to a new generation. Wes Craven did well on this film. No additional information to the title, it's just good that a third installment didn't brew. It's good for a rainy day, just less gore. 2 out of 5 stars
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Unfortunately Wes Craven was just making some quick cash with this one
user-1151220 November 2006
Admittingly Wes Craven claimed he made this sequel to disturbing and scary hit The Hills Have Eyes for some quick cash. This being said, the movie was made very fast and effort was minimal at best or so it seems. A plus is that the same music score director from Friday the 13th is aboard for this sequel. Only drawback is this film compared to Friday the 13th in a lesser sense, as death scenes were comparative and most of them were un-exciting. Parts I found interesting were Ruby's return to the desert as a civilized human now, the number of remaining mine cannibals, and the amount of buildings. This film was far less brutal than the original however many flashbacks and references connected the two well enough to be franchised. I physically burst out laughing to the canine flashback scene, I wont spoil it and tell you what happened but I will remind you its infamous and applaudable. This was a somewhat entertaining 87 minutes of an 80s horror sequel and may be valuable to have viewed for the upcoming The Hills Have Eyes 2 (2007). 80s horror sequels comparable to this film include: The Return of the Living Dead Part II, A Nightmare on Elm Street 2: Freddy's Revenge, Friday the 13th Part II, and The Howling II. I gave this film 6 stars because I am a true fan of Wes Craven and his horror masterpieces even if this one is a pull it out of his behind piece of work, I also enjoyed the remake tremendously and look forward to the forthcoming sequel.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
The Hills Have Eyes Part II
Toronto858 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This sequel to 'The Hill Have Eyes' might sound like good idea to a person, like myself, who had never seen it. They bring back back some familiar characters/actors from the first one, They decided to continue with the original story, Wes Craven wrote and directed it. But despite a good premise, The Hills Have Eyes Part II didn't deliver the goods. It begins with Bobby from the original who is seeing a psychiatrist to deal with his issues of seeing his family murdered. The funny thing is that his wife is Ruby who was a part of the sadistic family! That's right, Ruby, the one who helped save the baby in the original is now the wife of Bobby and has changed her name to Rachel.

The rest of the plot involves a biker gang of young people (including Ruby/Rachel) who are set to go out to the desert to race; the same desert in which the events from the first movie occurred. Of course when they get there, two members of the cannibalistic family begin their attack. So that is the basic plot. That may sound alright, but there are so many details of this movie that are just plain stupid. Oh and don't get fooled by reading that the character of Bobby returns considering he was only in this sequel for the first fifteen minutes. Major disappointment there.

So some other problems with part 2...first off, this feels a lot like an average slasher movie for the most part. Typical stalking scenes, a large killer with a machete, jump scares, a group of dumb teenage characters. The music used is straight out of Friday the 13th, no joke. Popularity of those films at the time clearly influenced the creation process of this sequel. There is a a blind girl in this who I wasn't sure was even blind for most of the film. She appears to see enough to dodge things such as flames and a burning mutant running after her. Another problem I have is with Ruby/Rachel. She lived with the cannibals for years but didn't recognize the area the group was exploring? How about telling them "hey let's get the hell out of here, my crazy mutant ex-family use to reside in these parts"?!

Movie started pretty good and with promise bringing back original characters, but quickly turned into a joke with a motorcycle riding cannibal, a dog having flashbacks from the original, characters who seem oblivious to the fact that there are mutants in the area, a blind girl who roams around alone while cannibal killers are on the loose. Probably the most stupid characters ever created in a horror movie. One part in particular really blew my mind with stupidity. A girl decides to take a relaxing shower all while knowing there is imminent danger around her. It's like she was thinking "Hey, someone might be trying to kill us, guess I'll take a shower".

There are good things about Part II like the return of Ruby/Rachel, Pluto and cameo by Bobby. The new member of the family, the reaper, was a pretty effective villain. But the stupid plot points made me shake my head way too many times for this to be a very good sequel. I love the fact that they go back to where it all started, but so many things make you go "huh" throughout the entire thing.
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed