Stark (TV Mini Series 1993) Poster

(1993)

User Reviews

Review this title
6 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Not bad.
rjpurves20 December 1999
If you haven't read the book, well you're going to enjoy this. If you have read the book, you'll either like or hate this.

It all depends how much of a "STARK" purist you are. I personally thought the book was far more enjoyable after watching this.

Some people I know didn't like it for it's strong environmental message. Personally I thought it was a good thing.

Go watch it. It's not a masterpiece of film but it is good entertainment.
11 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Reasonable yarn grounded by Austin Powers treatment
jldowsing12 October 2021
I haven't read Ben Elton's best selling novel, but I'd be interested to know the tone of the book compared to the teleseries.

My biggest gripe is too many actors are woefully miscast, some of which play annoying, unnecessary caricatures with poor accents. Nor does Ben Elton do his screen adaption any favours implanting himself in this ham soup featuring Australian acting stalwarts Colin Friels, Jacqueline Mackenzie, Bill Hunter, Gwen Plumb and Collette Mann.

Directed by the accomplished Nadia Tass, Stark moves at a decent pace - aided somewhat by the middle of the Western Australian outback, where most of the action takes place, appearing to be a convenient half hour drive from Melbourne, Sydney and Perth. There's enough in the story and sufficient action to hold attention, but the environmental destruction of Earth and the ills of capitalism are sobering topics. The panto vibe seems off kilter.

As the credits finally roll after a climax involving perhaps the worst special effects since the early incarnations of Dr Who, a narrator reels off frightening stats indicating the World is indeed dying. There's more weight in these two and a half minutes than the preceding two and a half hours.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Not less-than, but different from, the book.
andrew-barclay6 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
Stark, the show, should not be confused for Stark: A Novel. The Novel is less rushed, has more character development, and better jokes. More Jokes. I read Elton was sure he could write jokes but not sure he could write a novel so he crammed it full of gags, and it's very funny. When I saw Stark: A Mini-series when it first aired here in Australia, I was disappointed by several things, none more so than the casting of Bill Wallis as Walter. Walter is described as a huge mountain of a man, very physically intimidating, despite his utter pacifism and unwillingness to fight. I had read the novel and loved it when it came out, and the series was not funny enough for me, and I could not get over the omissions and differences. Having watched it again this week, I liked it more. Bill is actually pretty good as Wal. His Kiwi accent notwithstanding, I mean Aus and NZZ soldiers fought together in Vietnam and could conceivably become best mates. What is kinda prescient about the show is the visual representations of Australian beaches. To me is was silly to imagine them being so polluted when the show came out but nowadays.. I can see it creeping in. Needles, floating garbage islands. It's all happening. Elton is funny, he acts ok, he IS CD, CD is based on him and nobody else would have done it so well but CD looks too old to be pining after the female lead, and she is not, though very attractive, going to meet the standards of gorgeousness required to abandon you life long beliefs for. Friels character is way more sympathetic in the show than I recall him being in the book. Hunter and Friels are a study in opposites. ?bot excellent, talented actors, Friels underacts here, a study in subtlety. Hunter is OTT, but both outshine most of the rest of the cast (the guy who plays De Quincey is way better than I remember, a great performance). Sadly, no camels were hurt in this narrative, which Robs CD of the only "moment" he gets in the plot to meet his own definition of a hero. I love that scene in the book, but actually its way more consistent with who CD is to fail to get that moment. A different animal, but not as bad as I recalled it being. It's just not the book, and it's not the book I wanted to see made to a movie / series. Gridlock wold be much better. Never happened.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
It was great!
davidhinecpa17 November 2019
I read the book (along with many others Ben Elton wrote); I found the movie added to the experience; the acting was amazing as I recall.. (I have fond recollections of Bill Hunter and his character's dysfunctional family), killer cast and not too shabby production wise.. would love to be able to find this on a streaming service.. lol..
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Bird watcher
bevo-136782 December 2020
I like the bit where the bloke at the marina made homophobic remarks about sly Morgan
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
The ending appears to be missing
ibrahim_barclay6 January 2006
Warning: Spoilers
The film seems to have been made reasonably well but my impression is that the budget ran out and they stopped filming before they'd gotten to the end of the story.

The film stops a long way before the end of the book and neglects to tell the viewer what the Stark Conspiracy actually is.

It would have been a good film if they'd finished it!

I'd be interested to hear if anyone knows whether this film genuinely didn't get completed - especially as Ben Elton himself was starring in it.

My advice is read the book and don't bother watching the film.
0 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed