War of the Century (TV Mini Series 1999– ) Poster

(1999– )

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
9/10
Extraordinary film of an extraordinarily cruel war
Internist18 August 2006
This is a remarkable achievement (originally, four 50 minute episodes, but presented here as a 200 minute continuous whole on the DVD), unique in its content, style, and focus.

Some will say, 'I've seen this type of thing before - grainy black & white footage, while an erudite British voice intones in the background'. Or, 'more "war and Nazis"?; how many of these can the history channel show?' In fact, this film is unique. Anyone with the slightest interest in the second world war should consider it a 'must see'.

For the uninitiated, it provides a comprehensive and stirring presentation of what is arguably the most important battle of the most important war of the 20th, and possibly, any, century. For those more familiar with World War II and its history, stories, and tragedy, this documentary fills in a huge hole. A hole that has been present in virtually every non-Soviet-produced film of its kind - the hole that is the battle on the Eastern Front. This production, especially by its frequent and masterful use of archival footage and its inclusion of first-person accounts by the victors (Soviets), the vanquished (Germans), and the eternally oppressed (the innocent civilians of all stripes), has filled the gap.

Here, one is spared nothing. The atrocities are graphically presented (13 million Soviet civilians died, and millions more of its soldiers perished as well). But the inclusion of such horrors is not just for shock value (as shocking it is). No, the viewer is considered sophisticated and interested enough to be informed of the more fundamental reasons for the slaughter.

The enormity of the atrocities notwithstanding, the film also details and chronicles the more "usual" battles of the campaign. And here, it has few rivals - comprehensive, endowed with multiple first-person accounts (some disarmingly non-contrite), and an impressive amount of (what I presume to be) previously unseen color footage. The net effect is to convey to the viewer a picture, and a lesson, which few, if any, other documentaries of its kind are able.

This is a remarkable film. If you have even the slightest curiosity about the "war in the east", get it. You will not be disappointed.
24 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A must see just for the interviews alone.
posthumousdecay24 May 2017
This is a great documentary I must say and I've seen thousands. The 1st hand accounts are enthralling. I 1st watched this on the History Channel who uses their own narrator Michael Carrol who does a much better job than the DVD's Samuel West. I was disappointed when I bought it on DVD and it had the BBC narrator. It's so night and day the difference, and the dialogue is almost the same word for word. If you've seen this on DVD and liked it then try to locate the History Channel version under the Roger Mudd series History Alive. It's 10x better and it frankly makes watching the DVD version hard after seeing the History Channel version. The series is not at all a propaganda film but a collection of 1st hand accounts & interviews that told it how it was. While it is not in depth about the tactical aspect of the battles and doesn't have some of the battles that happened in it,I don't think that was the aim of the documentary in the first place. There are no falsifications I found in it, no made up facts. It's not jaded I found. If it wanted to paint the Soviets as evil or bad then it would have mentioned the Soviet attack on Finland,occupation of Baltic states and the invasion of Eastern Poland and the murder of Polish POW officers as well. It's some accounts of what happened when the worlds most criminal and deplorable dictators and their ideologies clashed on the battlefield.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Great Series, Powerful and Interesting
crossnation24 February 2023
As an American born and raised in the United States, our schools do not teach much of anything about the Eastern Front of World War II. This documentary series was my first real exposure to that part of history, and it is as amazing as it is disturbing.

The series is a combination of objective historical facts and numerous first hand accounts from all sides of a conflict that gave us some of the largest battles in human history and some of the most horrific atrocities.

It was not a perfect series, of course. "War of the Century" curiously omits the battle of Kursk, which was the largest tank battle ever. It also made no mention of the sinking of the Wilhem Gustloff, which is the worst maritime disaster ever.

Still, as an overview of that WWII front often ignored by American schools and entertainment, it is a great watch and very informative.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
An outstanding documentary
vodopivec2 August 2007
I bought this documentary on a DVD, and seen it at least 20 times so far. No matter how many times I've seen it, every time I find a new interesting detail. It consists of 4 episodes, with the overall length of 4 hours so.

The brutality of the eastern front is revealed vividly, and one starts to understand where the second world war was really decided. Listening to real people (of all kinds) on both sides, and connecting this to historical facts gives a full picture of events.

This documentary is a masterpiece, and if you buy this DVD, you won't be sorry.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Excellent account of what happened when Hitler attacked Stalin
dbborroughs18 June 2008
Long (originally four 50 minute parts release on DVD as one long program) but gripping account of the war between Stalin and Hitler that changed the course of the Second World War and the world. The film focuses just on the battle between the two nations and very little else. If it doesn't relate to the Hitler Stalin tussle its not included. Starting with the briefest of set ups to put the battle in context the film just tackles the war in a way that has rarely been done before.

As the film opens Hitler is feeling invincible but unsure what lay ahead since an invasion of England was far from certain and because the United States was coming into the war. Stalin knows war with Hitler is becoming but he never suspects that it would be sooner rather than later. As Hitler's troops began to amass for the attack Stalin still couldn't believe the attack was coming.

And then the dogs of war are set loose.

What follows are three of the most gripping hours I've seen on the Second World War. Bouncing between those who fought for the Germans, those who fought for the Soviets and those caught in the middle, this is as close as you are going to get to being there as you can get sixty years after the fact. Events are not just recounted but also explained we get into the mind set on both sides that caused things to happen. For example a German general is asked about an order he signed ordering the deaths of all Soviet political officers, was it not a terrible thing? The general then explains how the order came about and how it was handled matter of factly and in the course of daily activity.It just was another thing in the chain. Later the same general tries to explain (quite well actually) how many of the things that were done because how he and his fellows viewed the world differently. He doesn't excuse them, he simply asks that we look at the world from his perspective at the time. Seeing things not with our eyes today but the eyes of those in the thick of things changes what we feel.

Ultimately no one on either side is spared. The Soviet troops come off as badly as the Germans with the nastiness of the partisan soldiers being in a way more horrific since it was cruelty against its own people, The partisans should have cared, but ultimately didn't.

The story of the long slog to ruin bounces between the towns and villages over run up to the leaders in their palaces. We see the Soviet leader's uncertainty about what to do. And we see how early attempts to sue for peace lead to later executions as Stalin and his comrades had to cover up any notion that they would have ever even thought of surrender. We see how the Germans scramble as things don't go the way they thought they would (damn their timetable) Its program that you watch compulsively and will want to see repeatedly. Frankly there is just so much to this story you have to re-watch it. I was not even half way in and realized that I was missing stuff or that something I had just seen related to something earlier in such away that I wanted to go back and see it again for further clarification. Its a film thats filled with numerous "oh I see..." moments.

Not to put too fine a point on it, this is one of the best documentaries on the Second World War I've seen.

Close enough to 10 out of 10 to be a 10.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mind blowing. A MUST see.
chris-sedition2 November 2009
Go add this, now, to the #1 spot of your movie cue. Seriously, stop reading and go do it. Done? OK, now you can keep reading.

While War of the Century ("WOTC") is limited in scope to "just" the German v. Russian fronts, it one of the best documentaries ever produced in regards to the mentality of World War II. In that respect, it far exceeds the BBC's epic "The World at War" and Ken Burns' "The War." Moreover, WOTC manages to accomplish this in a mere four installments of 45-min episodes.

As others have said, this WOTC is riveting, moving, and wholly unsettling. There is brutally frank discussion about the extremes to which war drives people. Ex German and Russian soldiers talk about how, and why, they killed members of their own armies and innocent by-standers. Civilians, and soldiers, talk about their roles in murder, cannibalism, rape, torture, racism, and total destruction of the "enemy" (who is often hard to define at certain times).

In Apocalypse Now Col. Kurtz says, "It's impossible for words to describe what is necessary to those who do not know what horror means. Horror. Horror has a face … and you must make a friend of horror. Horror and moral terror are your friends. If they are not, then they are enemies to be feared." WOTC, through startling personal accounts, brings the stark reality of WWII right in to the comfort of your cozy living room. Bottom line: This is one of the top 3 documentaries on WWII (or any war) that I have seen. Moreover, it is a dark look into the human nature, and and the extremes to which people can endure.
6 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Another shameful anti-Russian program by the BBC.
toqtaqiya29 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
War Of The Century is a 4-part documentary series that I thought was very good at first, but after seeing the whole thing I've come to hate it. Some may wonder why. Some of this doc. was put together well after all. The direction is fine and so is some of the footage. But all this means nothing because this doc. is just more British propaganda critical of the Soviet war effort. It sidesteps most of what happened during the war between the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany and instead cleverly smears the Soviet side. Yes, this doc. manages to paint the defenders as the bad guys. You can expect the typical British anti-Stalinist propaganda but, whatever they claim, they don't care about the Soviet people too. The Russians had to deal with the biggest invasion in all of history. After his victory Adolf Hitler planned to enslave the people of the USSR, and settle their territories with Germans. Many millions were killed by the Germans in this war, 27 million Soviet soldiers and civilians in fact. Instead of showing the amazing heroism of the Russians this doc. instead makes up some bad stuff about the Russians that didn't even happen. The Americans and the British certainly didn't have to go through what the Russians went through. Still, the Germans behaved much worse. A whole episode was spent on the battle of Stalingrad. In this episode the viewer really gets to see what good guys the Germans were, while the Russians are presented as a bunch of disorganized savages. With all this anti-Russian propaganda one may wonder how the Russians won the war at all. The battle of Kursk, the siege of Leningrad and the later great Soviet victories are totally absent in this doc. The series ends with an episode titled Vengeance. It's an episode about the so-called Soviet atrocities. Russophobes continue to point out that Soviet soldiers raped some German women during the war, and this is presented as Russian vengeance. This is disgusting not only because the Germans behaved so much worse in Russia but also because of the falsifications and blatant anti-Russian propaganda that's brought up here. At least the German women lived. It's not mentioned that the Russians gave food to the Germans and helped them rebuild Germany after the war. Also, Stalin's alleged oppressions are on full display here while Hitler's genocidal policies barely get a mention. The victory parade at Red Square was shown at the end of the series. But it wasn't the whole parade, just the least interesting parts. It's mainly used to point out that Stalin didn't ride a horse that day because he was worried that he might fall off. It's mentioned that this bit of info is just a rumour, however. So, at the end of the series some anti-Stalinist rumour overshadows the great Russian victory. I will end my review by mentioning that the whole world benefited from the Soviet victory over Nazi Germany. This BBC program is yet another of numerous efforts by London to falsify the role of Russians in history. The BBC isn't a news channel. It's an imperialist anti-Russian channel that's designed to spread lies. It's absolutely shameful. The amount of Russophobia, historical falsiciation, and sheer nastiness in this doc. is simply staggering. I'm just glad that Stalin defeated that British agent by the name of Adolf Hitler and then ruined the British Empire. Still, the London oligarchy did find a way to create a new empire after World War II with the help of the United States. It's not surprising that Russia's enemies are still located in London.
11 out of 23 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
A propaganda movie
gennadylevitsky6 June 2016
It is basically a propaganda movie. It depicts the war on the Eastern front as a struggle between two evils: Hitler and Stalin (or, in more general terms, between Nazis and Communists) completely ignoring the fact who was the aggressor and who was the victim. In order to promote their ideology of "two evils" and brainwash the viewers the authors of the movie often manipulate the facts, ignoring some of them and exaggerating others. For instance, in the second part, when the movie deals with the occupied Ukraine, it presents German occupation authorities and Soviet partisans as the "two evils" who commit all the crimes against locals while, at the same time, it shows Ukrainian nationalists (UPA) (the "third force") as the "good guys" fighting "the bad" ones. In reality Ukrainian Resurrection Army committed a lot of horrible atrocities: it massacred civilian Polish population and wiped off entire villages in Galicia and Volhyn, many members of that army served Nazis and willingly participated in mass murder of the Jewish population in Western Ukraine. The movie is mute about those facts and when it shows the village with the massacred inhabitants and presents it as a crime committed by the Soviet partisans I am more than sure that it was rather a work of the Ukrainian nationalists (and the victims were, most likely, Poles). Anyone who doubts it can look at wikipedia to see how many Polish villages "good guys" destroyed exactly the same way. This is just one "inaccuracy" out of many. Overall, such unconstrained propaganda destroys what could be an interesting and educational movie about WWII.
8 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Incomplete, could have been a lot better
chilisquid12 February 2016
Well directed with excellent interviews and footage. I found it amazing how good the interviewed witnesses looked, some 55 years later. All witnesses had photos of themselves from the era.

Only problem is, there are maybe two episodes missing. Episode three ends with the Nazis surrendering at Stalingrad in February 1943. Episode four begins in June of 1944. What happened during those 16 intervening months ?? No mention of Kursk. No discussion of how the Russians clawed there way 1000 miles to the border of Germany. Episode four is mostly wrap up and discussion of war crimes and aftermath, very little detail on the military campaign.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Waste work just to give false propaganda of what really happened in the war
marq-4932323 May 2020
I hate this kind of documentary, Russians are the assasains vs nazis, WTF!!!
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed