The Wild Blue Yonder (2005) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
56 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Good
Cosmoeticadotcom7 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
I just watched Werner Herzog's 2005 science fiction fantasy film The Wild Blue Yonder, and am left in that rare position of not having much to say of the film that could really change the opinion of a viewer, pro or con, toward it. This is not because it is good nor bad, simply because it is one of those works of art that is not even on a good/bad scale. It is beyond such reckoning, a purely aural and visual experience for most of its 81 minutes, and thus has an effect similar to the phantasmagoric end of Stanley Kubrick's 2001: A Space Odyssey.

The narrative, however slight, is this: the alien (Dourif) comes to earth some decades ago, in a Third Wave of colonizers, before the supposed 1947 Roswell UFO crash, because his home planet entered an Ice Age. Upon landing, they attempted to establish their own version of Washington, D.C. out in the California desert, thus justifying Dourif's rants out in a ghost town. Their failure leads him to the conclusion that all aliens suck- a point he repeatedly hammers home. It also lets him go on about how mankind has ecologically ravaged the earth. He speaks of his CIA involvement, and more found footage, of the Jovian Galileo mission, allows him to hypothesize on the Roswell matter. Then he claims that the aliens brought with them microbial diseases. NASA launches a space mission to find inhabitable planets, but none are found in the Milky Way, until, via silly mathematics, a gateway to the Andromeda galaxy is found- one even the aliens did not know of. As the earth is getting more and more uninhabitable humans, who shortcutted their way to the alien Andromedan world, decide to explore it. Cue the Antarctic ice footage, meant to portray the frozen atmosphere and liquid helium ocean of The Wild Blue Yonder. While intensely beautiful and hypnotically mixed with the oral sounds of a bunch of Sardinian singers and an African singer, the film becomes really indescribable- but not in that good nor bad way. You just have to watch, whether you like or dislike it. When it's done, we see that the humans have returned to earth, aged only 15 years (comparisons of the archival footage vs. that Herzog shot for interviews) while the earth went through 820 years, and reverted to a wild state. Humans left the earth, and now treat it as a planetary game preserve. In the audio commentary, Herzog reveals that shots of the high green plateau that ends the film were from Venezuela, part of the leftover footage from his earlier film The White Diamond.

This film will doubtlessly bore many people, and it will turn off still others for a plenum of possible reasons, and in no way, shape, nor form, is this a masterpiece on par with the best in Herzog's oeuvre. But, even if one views it in the worst way, and calls it a daring failure, it is a film worth watching again. One day soon, I will.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Sort of a Documentary
bertseymour722 July 2008
I respect Herzog and like how he goes in strange directions, but with that sometimes he wanders down the wrong path, or maybe wrong isn't the word. He sometimes wanders down a boring path. Somehow Herzog got his hands on some space footage and some antarctic underwater footage and thought he could compose that into a sci fi movie.

This is of course a visually distinctive journey and a must for all die hard Herzog fans, but I felt it was a bit too strange and far out. Brad Dourif plays an alien on earth who says he sucks at what he does or something along those lines, which is kind of funny.

Maybe you have to be in the right atmosphere to enjoy this journey, but if you are only going to see one Herzog film, don't make it this one.
10 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
North American Premiere - David Jeffers for SIFFblog
rdjeffers19 November 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Tuesday November 8, 7:30pm Seattle Art Museum

An evening with Werner Herzog featured the North American Premier of his latest, "The Wild Blue Yonder", a strange, fictitious, quasi-documentary starring Brad Dourif as an alien and self described failure. Herzog uses a combination of vintage newsreel, NASA and exotic Antarctic Ocean footage along with bizarre narration from Dourif shot in the California Ghost town of Niland to tell a story of human travel to a far off planet and convince the viewer that interstellar space travel is utterly absurd. "My firm belief is that there will be no space travel of any significance. There is nothing out there for us. There is nothing out there period!" Running over the montage of otherworldly images is a musical score of Sardinian and Senegalese folk music, including "Shepherd's songs that date back to pre-history." The combination is at times tedious but at other times beautiful and hypnotic. The post-show discussion revealed Herzog to be thoughtful and engaging. He described Dourif as "My face, my appearance, my voice and my thought." Dourif chimed in with his own anecdotes, "I remember Werner calling me and saying, Brad, aliens suck!" A big shout out to Scarecrow Video and SAM for this memorable evening!
5 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An unique and fascinating sci-fi film as poetry even if it is hard work here and there
bob the moo25 September 2005
When their planet started to die, an alien race set out to evacuate the Andromeda system to other places within the universe that were inhabitable. Several of their ships reached Earth several generations later but by then the founding fathers had died off and left behind a lesser generation. On arrival on Earth things did not go as well as they had planned – attempts to build themselves a capital city to rival Washington DC end with a crumbling, desert collection of ruins. Looking at the journey itself and the problems they encountered, a surviving alien recalls the whole thing.

It would take a real talent to do it but if you were to take all the elements in the plot here you could easily produce an effects-heavy sci-fi epic that stretches over several films or books. So how much talent does it take to do just that using one actor, some expert contributors, underwater footage from under the ice flow and lots of stock footage? I'm not sure of the answer but the second way seems harder because it does deliver the goods in this fascinating film that dances along the line between interesting and pretentious. I found the story worked really well and the overall effect was to produce a sci-fi film as poetry, full of ideas and emotions. It is hard to describe but I found it effortlessly engaging and enjoyed it a great deal.

Of course the delivery was always going to be challenging and I can understand why it has got such a low rating on this very site. It is not a Hollywood sci-fi film, in fact it is not an easy film to put into a box and sell in such a marketplace because it is so unique. The direction is very daring and mostly works because the writing is there to do it. The dialogue is the story and it is very well delivered by Dourif to the point where he is never less than fascinating due to his words but also his convincing delivery of those words. The use of stock footage and locations that are very non-sci-fi are carried by Dourif's story telling but the problems come when he is absent for longer than a few minutes. Extended footage of diving below the ice sheet is interesting but it is the same thing over and over so, without a narrator to move us on and keep us interested, I felt that the film got close to boring. Fortunately this only happens a handful of times. The musical score is again very unusual for sci-fi but it does capture a strange sort of otherworldy sombre air.

Overall then this will probably put most viewers off very quickly. It is as much a piece of poetry as it is a piece of cinema and it is certainly not what you expect from a "sci-fi epic" although that is unquestionably what the story is. At times boring, the film is generally very engaging and interesting and it is well worth checking out to experience it as much as anything else.
57 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Genre bending mind bender.
Balibari13 September 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Herzog's film is based around the accounts of an alien forced to leave his own planet and travel across the Universe in search of a safe new home. After settling unnoticed on Earth, the alien race can only watch as mankind discover their homeworld and trample across it in the name of pioneering exploration.

Some interesting points are raised (the ethics of clumsy exploration, our perception of ourselves within the scheme of things etc.) but the format is rather hokey and Brad Douriff's monologues to camera are jarring and damage the films integrity and authority. But the real footage from an orbiting shuttle is captivating and the actual 'alien' planet is stunning (it's actually made up of footage shot under frozen water).

Flawed but unique, sporadically interesting and very beautiful.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
heady film will make you think about how you see the earth, the universe and people
dbborroughs18 August 2007
Werner Herzog's science fantasy about a trip to a far off planet. The plot concerns an alien played by Brad Dourif, who has come to this world from Andromeda when his world begins to die. He out lines the story of his time on earth and of our trip to his far off world. Consisting of new footage by Herzog the film also contains a great deal of footage from a space shuttle mission as well as images from under the Antarctic ice. Its a strangely hypnotic film thats often a head trip as we are forced to look at our own world as something, somewhere than what it is. This is a heady mix of facts and fictions mixed with beautiful images set to some intriguing vocal and cello music (think Tibetan throat songs) . For much of the film the mix works as we begin to see believe that the aliens are here and that we sent a mission that went there. The problem with the film is that there are long passages, particularly with the space shuttle stuff where its nothing but image and singing. It would be fine if there was a change of image but Herzog holds the images, say of an astronaut jogging, much too long. I don't why he felt the need to use all of the footage that was shot of some subjects. It will drive you to the point of slumber. Which isn't to say the film is bad. Its not. the dialog, well monologue is very witty and contains some great quotes. It also presents a few facts, about distance and our ability to bridge it that is wickedly disheartening for people looking to jump in a ship one day and travel far away, while at the same time opening you up to the possibility of actually doing it. Ultimately this is a movie that you will think about for a long time after you see it.
2 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Up We Go...
frankenbenz4 May 2008
Warning: Spoilers
I made the mistake of thinking I was about to watch the Herzog documentary Rescue Dawn was based on, but i soon found out I was wrong...very wrong. Instead, I spent 81 minutes watching "a science fiction fantasy" titled Wild Blue Yonder. In WBY Brad Dourif play an alien who narrates his way through NASA and arctic diving footage that Herzog interestingly uses completely out of context. The context is entrusted to Dourif's character who spins an elaborate yarn of human space exploration to his former home, the exploration of this distant planet and the astronaut's return to a future, pre-historic earth almost 200 years later.

WBY is essentially a found footage film, albeit an imaginative and interesting one. The highlight is the diving footage which truly feels like exploration of a alien world. The footage is hypnotic, perfectly accompanied by the equally hypnotic score by composer Ernst Reijsiger along with a song thrown indy rock genius Jim O'Rourke.

Herzog sandwiches interviews with real-life mathematicians between the found footage segments, adding credibility to Dourif's yarn. Yet overall there is a sense of tongue-in-cheek behind WBY -- Herzog obviously doesn't want us to take things too seriously. But if he doesn't, then what does he want? By taking these images out of context he forces us to shift our perspective and see them with new eyes. He succeeds and by doing so, he begs the question: why don't we always change our perspective when looking at the world around us? If we did there's a good chance we would be less likely to take things for granted and instead we would see the world with the amazement of a child's eyes.

http://eattheblinds.blogspot.com/
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Regretfully Have to Side With Awful Camp
Bruce-491 August 2006
I'm a pretty big Werner Herzog fan. I loved Grizzly Man. I loved Aguirre, Wrath of God, especially Herzog's commentary track. His performance in Incident at Loch Ness was amazing. I enjoyed The Burden of Dreams slightly more than Fitzcarraldo or My Best Fiend but I appreciate the whole narrative as documentary idea and vice versa. In this film, I was happy to see Brad Dourif stick his mug in the camera as a crazy alien. I went to see this at a Portland Werner Herzog mini-festival because I read that although the work was made for the BBC, the photography had to be appreciated on the big screen. I couldn't disagree more. The photography, home movies of people floating around in a space capsule or diving in a poorly lit sea looked like outtakes from any decent nature documentary. If accompanied by the experiences of the participants, it still could have been a decent show. If reconfigured as a clever twist on the imagery, a la Woody Allen's What's Up Tiger Lily? it might have held my interest. Unfortunately, the poor photography was, for the most part, accompanied by music. I have no problem with this. I enjoyed Koyaanisqatsi and Man With a Movie Camera. But here, the images are boring and the music (pseudo-throat singing and scratchy amateurish cello ambiance) is grating. As an example of the poor quality of the imposed story, here's an example. The explanation of divers swimming toward the light of a whole cut in an ice cap are explained as astronauts transporting themselves by disintegrating themselves into pure light and reconfiguring at the other end. It's an amazing visual effect, I suppose for someone who has never noticed that looking through water in a glass distorts an image. Then again, anyone under three would be bored to tears by the images of a scientist nodding off during an interview. This experience is probably closest to something like Andy Warhol's Sleep, which was a long, unbroken shot of someone sleeping for a guy sleeping for five hours. I could have take a nap during that, though. The music in this film kept jarring me awake. I rarely post negative comments. Why bother? But if I can convince one Herzog fan to watch this on DVD, where he can turn it off, instead of sitting through it in a theater, I will have provided a useful public service.
24 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Earnest, humorous, and strangely moving.
danbebber13 September 2005
I caught this film on BBC4 while flicking through the channels last night. An hour and twenty minutes later I sat in front of my TV, knowing that I had experienced a work of rare film poetry. The plot (and here's the 'spoiler', not that it would spoil any enjoyment of the film), is that an alien from the Andromeda system (or a seriously confused human),played by Brad Dourif, who landed on Earth after fleeing his frozen world, tells the story of a group of Earth astronauts who travel to the frozen Andromedan planet and then come back to Earth. Brad Dourif tells his story from an abandoned city, full of half-finished buildings and broken trailers, that was to have been the mighty capital of Andromedans on Earth. The story is illustrated by footage of NASA missions, diving expeditions, physics lectures, and ancient news reels. What really makes it, however, is the soundtrack. I don't know what the music is, but it sounded like some version Mongolian yodelling. Juxtaposed with the images and storyline, the whole thing becomes strangely moving. Please don't expect a conventional Hollywood storyline- there a many long, apparently monotonous sequences, perhaps reminiscent of Space Odyssey. Just relax into it. If you have any depth, you will not be disappointed.
54 out of 67 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A nice idea
moviemanMA13 July 2009
I am a huge fan of Werner Herzog. I think he is truly an amazing and inspirational filmmaker and I will never hesitate to watch one of his movies. This one intrigued me because it was so different from his other features. Sadly it was a bit of a let down, but not completely. I wouldn't recommend this film to many people (very few actually). It's so out there and different that I can't put my finger on exactly what it is. It's part documentary, part science fiction, and part Discovery Channel. Most of the footage is from NASA space stations or under the ice in Antarctica. There was strange music and very little narrating. It was a bit much and could have been cut down to increase the effect of the footage. I liked some of the ideas tossed out there like aliens who were not very intelligent (although they managed to travel to Earth millions of light-years away). The film was a bit confused as to where it wanted to go and what it wanted to be. A solid effort by Herzog and very original. I was interested throughout and even now I want to go back and take a peak. Maybe someday, but not right now.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
I tried to like it, I really did...
rbsjrx20 November 2006
...but by the end of it, I was left with the feeling that there was a slice of my life I'll never get back. This is an easy film to summarize, though. Good, sometimes arresting, imagery strung on a thin but interesting plot, all accompanied by the world's most annoying sound track. The pacing is glacial. The scenes play out way too long - which is emphasized by the droning atonal background "music".

I can appreciate the parable of being good stewards of our home planet. I can appreciate the wry wit with which the subject of aliens is treated. What's inexcusable, though, are the gross technical gaffes laying around like mines in a film which otherwise goes out of its way to establish its technical credentials.

I can understand and appreciate what Herzog was trying to accomplish with this film. Still, a misfire is a misfire...
21 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
hypnosis
garyjpurcell21 September 2005
We are by now quite commonly aware of the various statistics illustrating our remoteness from our nearest supposedly 'habitable' planet, that even Alpha Centauri, a very close neighbour, is some 3 light years off and many hundreds of years travelling at conventional means (that would be our fastest rocket propulsion in a vacuum, and a slingshot trajectory). But there was something about Herzog's description of this fact, spoken directly into the camera by a suitably intense Brad Dourif (though this is Brad's forte), that hit home, that filled me with that sense of wonder, that was also also tinged with dread. Perhaps it was the context, Herzog's narrative about alien travellers having many generations ago escaped their distant and dying world to eventually arrive here on Earth, attempt to colonise and then witness generations later, humanity's own attempts to escape the dying Earth and seek out a barely habitable world across space.

There is a primary loneliness in this concept, especially so in the human's arrival at that very same long-abandoned world, deciding to cope as best as they can with the liquid-helium atmosphere. Nothing like earth but then nothing else like Earth was anywhere discovered.

This feast of philosophical posers is coloured with actual Nasa on-board shuttle footage, that, although initially falls short of complementing the science-fantasies of the narration, does eventually blend successfully. And by the time this is settled the viewer is already drawn in. The thoughts and visions being presented us, the zero-g astronauts and ice-divers floating to the semi-atonal wailing in Ernst Reijseger's soundtrack, have put us in a place of submission and meditation rare for cinema. It would be interesting to know whether Herzog created this story line around the Nasa footage or the inverse. For by the end of the film, everything is convincing.

A very unusual cine-poem that will stand up to repeat viewing. For i know each time i will come away with the feeling i have been infused with some ethereal wisdom.

g
35 out of 47 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Long stretches of flatness
howard.schumann12 March 2007
Looking like a cross between Klaus Kinski and Christopher Lloyd, a disheveled man (Brad Dourif) stands in a junkyard filled with broken buildings peering into the camera. He tells us that he is an alien from the Andromeda system who came to Earth many years ago because his world had become an inhospitable ice field. Now disheartened because his attempts at building a complex with government buildings and shopping malls on Earth has failed, he tells us that "aliens suck", strange language indeed for an Andromedan. In an ironic twist, mankind undertakes a space mission to his home planet to search for a new home for Earthlings after a dangerous microbe is discovered in a captured Roswell UFO.

Made originally for television, Werner Herzog's science fiction fantasy, The Wild Blue Yonder feels like an in-joke that the viewer is not in on. The film mixes NASA footage from a space mission in 1989, cinematography from an exploration under the frozen waters of the Arctic, and mock interviews with scientists and mathematicians Roger Diehl, Ted Sweetser, and Martin Lo that often make them seem like objects of laughter. Separated into ten titled chapters, the film consists of the alien ranting at the camera, astronauts doing chores, eating and brushing their teeth, and explorers swimming under an Andromedan ocean looking for intelligent jellyfish.

All of it is set to an other worldly soundtrack performed by Ernst Reijseger, singer Mola Sylla, and a five-voiced Sardinian choir that weaves a tapestry of radiance but the film's moments of brilliance are mixed with long stretches of flatness. Ultimately, for all its spiritual pretensions, Herzog offers only a rationalist's point of view, emphasizing man's isolation rather than his connectedness and missing in the phrase of Deepak Chopra "the stillness at the heart of creation, where the universe correlates all events".
1 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
A Herzog sell-out.
InterArmaEnimSilentLeges15 January 2011
The only possible reason why anyone would ever watch this god-awful "movie" is because Herzog's name is on it. It's around 1 hour 15 minutes of off-the-shelf NASA stock footage - which anyone can download off the internet - along with exerts from some interviews of half-baked, dreamy-eyed scientist talking about outlandish theories that may or may not be feasible in about 5000 years. And these interviews, I'm sure, are not meant for this production either, but simply lectures from some Discovery Channel science program.

Add to that, an utterly annoying soundtrack of Nazi-era German soprano/opera, and some tribal folk music - all mixed at levels that make you cringe - and you have a recipe for agony.

Then you have the ridiculous narrative, or "story". Now, I like Brad Dourif as much as the next guy. Actually I think he's a great actor, and the total failure of this "movie" is certainly not his fault. But the narrative that he is forced to act out is really far, far beyond silly. I mean, take "Invasion of the body snatchers" times "Independence Day" powered by "The Wizard of Oz", and you'll still have a story that is more believable than this thing!

So to summarize; Take about bunch of stock footage off the internet, edit it together in no particular order, add some exerts of interviews with some NASA eggheads that you found on Discovery, slap on the most annoying music you can find, and then hire an actor to narrate a "space story", which has nothing to do with the images or footage that you are seeing - and then you'll have this movie.

I guess Herzog was running behind on his mortgage and asked himself "what can I come up with before the end of the week?". Well, this is it! You have been warned.
10 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
One of the Less Powerful Moments in Herzog's Dialog with Humanity
mstomaso2 November 2008
Everything in The Wild Blue Yonder is intentional.

The use of stock footage from NASA in place of special effects and the inescapable tedium of this footage; the implausible concepts from physics which are neither explained nor clearly connected to the vaguely coherent "plot"; the fact that alien space traveler Brad Dourif and his alleged (but never seen) extraterrestrial colleagues do not appear to be in any way different from somewhat neurotic Americans with bad business sense; The stark beauty of the underwater scenes and the immediate disruption of this beauty by the arrival of humanity; the accuracy of the alien narrators comments regarding the impossibility of intergalactic travel and the continuity problems which stem from this jarring set of facts.

I am not sure Herzog planned all of this, but I do believe that once he has identified the film he is making, he's pretty meticulous and consistent about putting it together.

This film has two texts:

1 the plot - which is a bit of silliness about aliens coming to earth because their planet is undergoing environmental catastrophes and earthlings going to their planet for the same reason. This story is so absurd that it is difficult to understand why some reviewers seem to believe it is really most of what is going on in the film.

2. the joke - which is the meta-text, and a contribution to Herzog's seemingly endless commentary on human nature and human affairs, though definitely one of his less clear and forceful critiques. The film parodies the Star Trek concept of space travel and the future as a panacea for human problems, and does so on many levels: including patent ridiculousness of the plot; the tedious stock footage which is so painfully unrelated to the narrative; the alien who looks so much like us it is unnerving and who admits, halfway through the film, that he and his fellow aliens "suck".

What Herzog ends up with here is possibly the lowest budget space movie ever shot. Assuming he got his usual fee, Brad Dourif probably challenged the post-production budget for the most costly element of this film. What the more receptive members of his audience get is a film that is strangely difficult to forget, despite the fact that its plot is utterly forgettable.

As a space adventure, Blue Yonder fails utterly and miserably - and that is part of Herzog's point! As a smart sci-fi film - not as challenging or stilted as Tarkovsky's work, but in some ways, as profound - it succeeds, but does not really excel.

Recommended for fans of philosophical sci fi and fans of Herzog. Not recommended for anybody else.
27 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Curious, somewhat experimental; perhaps one for niche audiences
I_Ailurophile17 November 2022
This might actually be the most peculiar film Werner Herzog has ever made: a fictional story, told only through the narration of a character, with all but a scant few moments of visuals being nothing more than documentary-style footage of a wide range of people, places, and things. This goes well beyond Herzog's 1992 feature 'Lessons of darkness,' which explored imagery of Kuwaiti oil fields with the presupposition of how it might look to a visiting extraterrestrial. The very concept sounds like something a film student might make as their first high school project. That goes as well for the narration, which is loosely science fiction in nature, yet wide-ranging as it diverts into various topics - a monologue which somewhat feels like how a beat poet might approach genre storytelling. Save for the filmmaker's utmost professionalism and experience, and the involvement of unmistakable Brad Dourif, it wouldn't at all be hard to view 'The wild blue yonder' as being pretty much anything other than a Herzog picture. Yet here we are.

All this is well and good, though there remains the question of the value of the viewing experience. It's a fascinating idea, and maybe a daring one. The footage greet us ranges from interesting to beautiful, to inspiring: useful for the purposes of the feature, the visuals are also such that I would like to see them in an earnest documentary, sans recontextualization, to gain an understanding of what it is we're seeing in the first place. That narrative that is told in so novel a fashion is simple, and simplified compared to what we might get in a more conventional sci-fi flick, yet no less worthy for the fact of it. All this is wonderfully enriched by the fabulous original music of Ernst Reijseger and Mola Sylla, superb and otherworldly and amplifying the latter sense about the presentation. Whatever else is true of 'The wild blue yonder,' there's surely not much else quite like it.

This is almost experimental in nature, and surely will appeal best to only a select audience. It dabbles with the familiar, but in a decidedly unfamiliar way, and for all the ingenuity, I don't think it's unfair to say that by any measure it's a little light on content. Still, whether one is a fan of Herzog or just a cinephile at large, I think this is well worth checking out on its own merits - certainly not for all comers, but for those receptive to all the wide possibilities of what movies to offer, it's just another part of the splendid tapestry. Don't go out of your way for 'The wild blue yonder,' but this is a fun little trip.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
barely even qualifies as a movie
jnatch4 April 2007
First, I love Werner Herzog. I am a very big fan of his and I also respect people taking chances and trying new ideas. But this smacks of someone barely even trying. It's just some ridiculous sci fi story thrown together and narrated while showing stock footage of deep sea diving and space station video. The story is so inconsistent to begin with and boring. "We came from Alpha Centauri and built a mall and no one shopped there." What the heck is that supposed to mean, and who cares? Half of the movie is stock footage of the space station and we are supposed to imagine these are astronauts traveling to a distant star that, as it was just explained to us, would take hundreds of generations to complete. I would say this is one of the worst movies I have ever seen, but even though I popped in a DVD and sat there for 90 minutes, I technically wouldn't even call it a movie. It also isn't a documentary. It is one of a kind, a very very bad kind.
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
I can't stop thinking about it
woowoowoonin31 March 2007
Most of the reviews of this movie on here are negative. I can TOTALLY see where they are coming from, but it seems that everyone else's LEAST favorite parts are what transfixed me. Yes, some of the astronauts-in-space shots went on a bit long, but the music is so beautiful. The opera, tribal music, and string instruments used throughout the film, to me anyway, illustrated the beauty contained in the unknown and unknowable. The shots under the "frozen sky" really DO look like an alien landscape. They are beautifully shot, and bring with them a feeling of both freedom and claustrophobia. And Brad Dourif's voice, his eyes, they make him a more convincing alien that ANY million-dollar sci-fi blockbuster. Just a man kicking dirt at the side of the road, so upset as his (and OUR) failings. If you have PATIENCE, try this movie.
23 out of 30 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Unwatchable
drywontonmee18 August 2007
This is a desperately poor, indulgent, cheap, empty, irritating, unwatchable concoction of clips tied together with an infantile plot and dressed up with some ethnic chanting intended to make it seem meaningful and spiritual or something.

It is the laziest piece of movie non-art I've seen in quite some time... maybe ever. Dross, crap, worthless nonsense. I feel awful after watching it. How can people get away with this?

We are required, in this commenting system, to write ten whole lines of text in order for the comment to get accepted. So, we have to find a way of elaborating on that which is without content or substance or quality. This is not easy, how far can you stretch the idea that something is simply crap?

Why should we be required to exert effort in critiquing that which involved NO EFFORT? Not only were there no original scenes filmed besides the narrator, the story had no consistency, plausibility, character, insight, or intelligence of any sort. It was like someone farting in your face and expecting you to think it was life-enhancing.
10 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A very interesting idea !!
filmfanman106 July 2006
I just saw this film at the L.A. Film Fest and I was intrigued by the idea. Brad Dourif was the perfect choice for the alien role and even though I do not believe this film will be embraced by mainstream American film goers, I think this is one of the most beautifully photographed films in some time, which of course is a tribute to a master filmmaker like Werner Herzog. Herzog is definitely one of the most talented directors in the world who hasn't really found a niche in America, which is a real shame. This is a great film which I don't think any other filmmaker could have made so beautiful, comical, and overall enjoyable.
12 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Could Not Find Reason To Not Turn It Off
mdkrause-18 February 2007
I have to admit that my family and I only made it through about 25 minutes before we decided to try and salvage the rest of the evening (and turned it off). The photography was not remarkable by any stretch of the imagination (at least in the first 25 minutes). We are very open minded about movies and this one was a real stinker. It was kookie...but not in a good way....kind of in a pathetic way... like trying to have a conversation with a paranoid schizophrenic. I really wish I had something positive to say but I don't. I feel like warning people to not waste their time. It is possible that the movie did a complete turnaround later (after 25 minutes). I haven't actually turned a movie off like this for many years.
9 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Prick up your Ears
tedg15 January 2007
Well, you know you make friends and any good friend you don't abandon, no matter what.

We get old, things change. We relax into what we still imagine is risky adventure. And in friends we don't point out the reality that what might have been important then, isn't now.

Herzog is a friend, a good one. I've trusted him in the past and when he's let me down it has been honorably. So I'll come to anything he makes, even though I know sometimes I'll have to make excuses for him.

And that's what I have to do here, apologize, justify.

When Herzog approaches a project, you can see that it has only one conceptual thrust. Just one. That's been fine for me because he takes that one idea — whatever it is — to such extremes with such honesty and commitment it blossoms into levels that resonate.

The idea here is similar to one he has explored before: the images don't matter, anything can be used, even stock images. The story doesn't matter at all; any tripe can suffice, the more generic the better. There need be no point, no message, no root into your soul, or the group soul.

All we need is aeolian sound, edited in a way that corresponds in an obvious way with splashes of color. Its the rhythm of the thing, established aurally and only then visually, with the visual pace lagging. Its a way of letting us know that anyone who does this can impart religion of any content.

Throughout is a supposedly wised up guy constantly reminding us that he could have told us so.

Ted's Evaluation -- 3 of 3: Worth watching.
9 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Typical Herzog artsy-fartsy crap - ultimately boring
clymbon5 June 2008
This is not a science fiction movie at all. It's some actors standing around on vacant lots blabbing some nonsense about how their great-great-great-etc. grandfathers came to earth and decided to build... wait for it... a Shopping Mall! Utterly ridiculous. There's some good NASA footage, but that footage would have been better used in a straightforward science documentary. Similarly, the footage of ice divers is excellent, but I found myself thinking that there must be an original soundtrack about ice diving that went with the footage, and would probably be much more interesting to listen to, since the footage didn't really have anything to do with the story line of the movie.

In summary, if you're into watching Werner Herzog play around with medium of film, maybe you'll enjoy this, but if you were expecting an actual movie, you'll be sadly disappointed.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Herzog's a most gracious host giving us "Into the Wild Blue Yonder"
knidonovan22 July 2006
What makes Herzog mind numbingly talented is his eye for absolute heart stopping beauty and shocking humor all in a shot. For this I never tire of watching Herzog's films over and over again.

In Into the Wild Blue Yonder he again encompasses the genius and silliness of humankind and nature. He allows your eyes to wander long all around in his shots, gracefully to take their time in childlike wonder. It's a slow food movie. He trusts that you have a sense to enjoy all the irony, possible melancholy, waltz- like fluid motion, transfixing colors, the plain goofiness without feeling you must be a "film snob. A delight for the eyes to be sure!

Choosing Brad Dourif for his punctuated passionate alien was perfect! As an actor he is always fascinating to behold. In "Into the wild... " as much so as the underwater scenery.

Herzog will always be my favorite director for his open invitation to every viewer to take what they might from his films.
11 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
The Emperor's New Clothes, by Werner Herzog
hollishanover1 February 2008
Warning: Spoilers
What the? This astoundingly painful patchwork of filched free footage, oddball tribal music and an old dude with a ponytail portraying an exotic alien from Andromeda (which, by the way, is a galaxy with 100 billion stars, not an ice bound planet with jellyfish), has been greeted with mega gushes from smitten Herzog fans who diligently seek meaning where there is none. As the title of this review would suggest, I, and a very few others it seems, can see the old boy's bum.

The plot has been recounted many times in these reviews, so I will just hit the lowlights. Earthlings and Andromedans (perhaps they should call us Milky Wayans) switch planets because of mutually uninhabitable conditions at home. Doesn't sound too bad yet. Wait. The Earth people apparently make the two and one half million light year trip in a small earth orbiter from the late eighties utilizing an exotic technology announced by a smart looking guy standing in an orange grove. The uninhabitable nature of Earth is difficult to discern because of the traffic filled interstates in the background of one of the Andromedan's soliloquies.

Environmental consciousness abounds - for instance, film is preserved by using the same wistful shot of the alien but using different voice-overs on at least two occasions. Set expense is minimized by using a trailer junkyard and a ... something with columns perched on dirt. Script pages were saved by having insufferable lengths of time showing five or six people (the Earth contingent, I presume) floating in the space capsule and the same amounts of time consumed by other scenes of scuba divers and jellyfish. The musical score is a sort of eerie wailing which I contend was recorded by holding a microphone over the audience at the premier.

Hunter Thompson might have liked this picture, providing he was properly medicated. I didn't. If you want to see space journeys made in unlikely conveyances, I recommend The American Astronaut in which yokels from Oklahoma travel in space in a barn.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed