"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" Fatal Figures (TV Episode 1958) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
12 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Skimming reviews and want to touch base with my 2 cents
glitterrose1 July 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Harold doesn't have a lot going on in his life. I think the death of his 'friend' held a mirror up to his own life and what he sees makes him even more depressed. I say 'friend' because Harold and this friend waved to each other but he absolutely didn't know anything else about this person he's calling a friend.

I don't think John McGiver sounded drunk in this episode. I think he's giving this voice to a character that's drained dry. I'm assuming the only thing that got Harold out of the house was his job. He's not married, doesn't have kids, etc. It sounded like he did want more out of life but unfortunately he's got a sister that's a control freak. I'm not so sure I want to point out incest for why his sister flipped out on the idea of Harold being with another woman. There's a part of me that wants to consider the time frame. Harold's sister didn't have a job outside of the house so I'd consider it more from the point of view of losing a house she'd been in for many years and the point of view of having to get a job to support herself. It's quite a radical change when everything's changing at once.

Harold is a fair man. He puts just as much blame on himself as he does on his sister's controlling ways.

Anyway, Harold is determined to make up for lost time and wants to make himself important to himself. Take note of what he's doing. He steals a car, bottle of perfume, kills his sister and then kills himself. He's crossing the old figures out and changing the data by one to show he's part of this statistic. He's not going around bragging "I stole that car, bottle of perfume and killed my sister!" He only tells the cop he killed his sister because in his mind the murder wouldn't count if an outsider didn't say it was murder.

I didn't really consider the suicide to be played for laughs or even mock Harold for being so obsessed with these figures that he'd do this off the wall stuff. I think there was another message in Harold's suicide. I'm speaking as somebody that's struggled a lot and I don't think suicide is something done in the spur of the moment and you do this after a minute of thinking about it or doing it because you saw the word 'suicide' in a book. Imo suicide is usually something that a person has had to carry with them for a very long time. Please note the recent example of Naomi Judd's suicide. She hung on for many years til she couldn't bare it anymore. So I do think the writer has mixed signals if you thought this is something done on a spur of the moment.

And maybe I'm wrong for interpreting something the writer might not have intended. Harold seemed to snap after the death of his friend. The viewer can't see into Harold's past and see if he'd been struggling openly before the start of the episode or if this stuff was simmering below the surface and it all started erupting and would've came out of Harold whether his friend had died or if something else happened to set him off.

I do think the episode is interesting but the suicide is something to be wary about. Different people are gonna come away with different thoughts and there might be just as many that come away with the feeling of disgust at how Harold's suicide was handled.

One last tidbit: Mannix fans might want to check out this one in order to see Lt. Malcolm.
9 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Lies, Damned Lies, and Statistics.
rmax30482311 June 2012
Warning: Spoilers
John McGiver is Mr. Goames, one of those freaks who wants to be an outstanding member of some statistically significant group, the kind of guy who might travel across the country on a pogo-stick just to be the only one who ever did it.

He discovers that the most select group in the nation is murderers and commits a murder in order to be included in the contemporary version of the Guiness Book of World Records.

The problem is that the murder is too well done and when he confesses, the police don't believe him.

It's rather light hearted and McGiver gives his usual performance, sounding as if he had a sinus problem, and looking goggle eyed. It's not a winner but neither is it dull.
17 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Deadly statistics
TheLittleSongbird13 February 2023
Don Taylor directed seven episodes of 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents', of varying quality. Of which "Fatal Figures" is the third, following the above average but unexceptional "The Deadly" and the excellent "The Right Kind of House". 'Alfred Hitchcock Presents' does have some light-hearted, droll humoured episodes, but the premise for "Fatal Figures" was one of those could have gone either way ones. With a real danger of being really daft if not done right.

"Fatal Figures" is watchable and fun enough and the acting saves it. It is a long way from a great episode though and does fall into the trap that the premise had unfortunately, after the absolutely wonderful previous episode "Lamb to the Slaughter" this was a disappointment. When it comes to Taylor's episodes, "Fatal Figures" is closer to "The Deadly" in quality rather than "The Right Kind of House" for similar reasons to each other. This reviewer does give it a small recommendation but doesn't consider it a must.

Quite a lot is good here. John McGiver is suitably droll and befuddled and Vivian Nathan is a very effective contrast and does sliminess unsettlingly. The chemistry between them is strong. Hitchcock's bookending is as ironic as ever and in an entertaining way that fits the light hearted tone of the story very well.

The production values are simple and have atmosphere and the theme music is appropriately macabre. Did enjoy the light hearted-ness of the script and there are intriguing moments in the story. Taylor directs more than competently.

However, "Fatal Figures" is rather flawed when it comes to the story. It has moments, but badly lacks suspense, feels over-stretched (making for some draggy run out of ideas like pacing in the second half) and goes too far on the silliness. Especially the ending, which is truly ludicrous.

Also felt that there could have been more tautness in the writing and the pacing plods. While McGiver does a good job in the lead role, not enough is done allowing one to care for him and he does act in a way that makes one feel frustrated by the decisions he makes.

Overall, above average and decent but not much here that is mind blowing. 6/10.
7 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
"I want to be something. To be somebody."
classicsoncall22 September 2021
Warning: Spoilers
In a case of carrying things a bit too far, Harold George Goames (John McGiver) discovers a unique way to deliver his name into the record books. If this had been a story about the difficulties of mental illness it might have made more sense, but the whole thing was presented in a decidedly ironic way. When Harold stole that bottle of perfume from the drug store, I wouldn't really consider that a robbery, it was a shoplifting offense if anything. But in his addled mind, I guess Harold was capable of justifying anything he did or was about to do. Meanwhile, sister Margaret (Vivian Nathan) couldn't have been more of a boring recluse herself; these folks really needed to get a life. Considering how irritated Margaret got when George declined a regular game of Chinese checkers, she might have joined him in the suicide column after his untimely demise.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Chillingly prescient
sheepandsharks14 May 2023
Warning: Spoilers
A depressed, bitter man realizes that he is nothing special in the world. He has no lover. His job is commonplace. His days are tedious. He won't be remembered when he dies.

So he decides he will do something to be remember by: murder. Sound familiar?

Well, in 1958, it didn't -- which is why this episode is largely comedic. The premise is meant to be SO outlandish as to be whimsical.

Of course, in modern-day America, the disgruntled loser who decides to gain infamy by committing a mass shooting is a dime a dozen. He isn't looking to be a number in a statistics book, but to get his own Wikipedia page and at least a day of the 24-hour news cycle covering him.

For that reason, this episode that would otherwise be mediocre gets high marks from me. It's bizarre to watch something so horrifically commonplace today be portrayed as comically outlandish. It's like holding a funhouse mirror up to reality.

I will say that the very end of the episode is disturbing for any time period: a suicide played for laughs. It doesn't matter if the guy "had it coming" or whatever -- it's messed up.

My only other complaint is in regards to the treatment of the man's sister and murder victim in this episode. Even though it's made clear that she has taken care of her unappreciative older brother for more than a decade, she's also painted as if she "had it coming" before her murder. It's suggested that she chased women away from her brother and deliberately made him miserable. This reeks of Hitchcock's normal misogynistic slant, where all women in his productions are either bitter old shrews or young, seductive temptresses -- but are all out to make men miserable for some reason. Go to therapy, Hitchcock!
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Driven by Numbers
Hitchcoc5 July 2013
Of course, one could say that the whole thing is ludicrous. However, as John McGiver points out to us time after time, we are all nothing; we are just an unrecognizable piece of America. He uses an almanac to see just how insignificant he is. It becomes his purpose to put himself into the statistical records as a somebody. He does this by finding categories that have less people in them and then finding out a way to join that group. Unfortunately, the statistics he chooses are those that involve murder and other acts of violence. He lives with a virago of a sister who has cut off every chance of him being happy. She is about as slimy as any villain with a pencil thin mustache. She becomes furious when he tries to avoid their weekly Chinese Checkers game (a perfectly dull game for incredibly dull people). She harasses and belittles him. Had he wished to join a positive statistical group, things might have worked out better. But she has stolen any resolve he has had. Anyway, there is one page in the almanac and that is the driving force. McGiver is quite good in this. He literally carries on conversations with himself and goes about things in a most business-like way.
18 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
WHEN IN ROME, DO AS THE ROMANS DO!
tcchelsey16 April 2024
Another gem by Robert C. Dennis, one of Hitchcock's favorite tv writers, and for good reason. Hitch seemed to be intrigued with the "little guy angle, only the little guy who would get himself in big trouble. Such a treat to watch.

Case in point, legendary character actor John McGiver is perfectly cast as bored "nothing ever seems to happen to me..." Harold Goames. Interestingly, his hobby is keeping up on crime statistics, so much that he would like to add to the figures --and become a part of history? You have to chuckle a bit as you watch Mr. Goames literally "check off" various crimes to his delight!

An outrageous story to watch from start to finish, and deadpan McGiver is the whole show. As I have written before, it may have been a tv first - to find yourself actually rooting for the bad guy in many of Hitchcock's stories. Pure genius from the master of suspense.

Look for Ward Wood, best known for MANNIX, playing yet another cop. Popular character actress Vivian Nathan co-stars.

Another Classic one man show. SEASON 3 EPISODE 29 remastered Universal dvd box set. 5 dvds. 17 hrs length. 2007 release.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Strange sense of humor?
cpotato101017 December 2018
From what I remember of John McGiver, he played parts where the character had a rather dry sense of humor. His line about the owner of the store who died being a friend of his, whom he had never talked to is one.

And Vivian Nathan's delivery of some of her lines, while meant to belittle John's character, were also done with a light tone.

A good fit for an Alfred Hitchcock episode.

It would also be interesting to look up the data for 1957.

Out of a population of 172 million, were there really 7124 murders and 16008 suicides?

One disturbing bit - that John's character wanted to murder to achieve fame - now in the time of mass shootings, not at all funny.
11 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
I'm confused...
vnash8582918 July 2018
Wouldn't figures for 1957 be published in 1958? So his crimes would have been included on the 1958 totals (published 1959). Maybe I don't understand 1950's almanac....
8 out of 20 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
The previous episode was a classic...."Fatal Figures", however, is far from a classic.
planktonrules1 April 2021
Familiar character actor John McGiver plays a most unusual guy. It seems his character has lived a very dull and ordered life so he decides he needs to leave a mark...a statistic of which he is a part. So he decides to murder someone just to make his mark....a rather strange and contrived reason to kill. In fact, he doesn't even care if he's caught and actually WANTS to be caught in order to make his mark....and when that doesn't happen, he decides to leave his statistical mark in another way.

This episode was just okay at best. Not terrible but harder than usual to believe nor care about one way or the other. A clear case where the writing disappointed.
9 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
John McGiver sounds drunk in this one; hint of incest
bribabylk28 November 2014
Warning: Spoilers
Maybe the lead actor had a cold or was on some sort of medication, but he sounds and even acts a little tipsy in this episode. It would be interesting to find out which possibility was the real one. Perhaps he intended for the character he was playing to come across as "under the influence"; that might explain the odd course of action he takes in his quest for significance. McGiver's strange demeanor and detached affect might also be seen as a sign of autism or Asperger's today.

The belittling, grasping sister displays the outrage of a wronged wife when she thinks her brother has a girlfriend; she even refers to the presumed sweetheart as "another woman". She's never let her brother get within spitting distance of a romantic relationship with anyone, and more to the point she herself never married. One has to wonder how deep and in what track her feelings run.

The story was by Miriam Allen deFord, noted for her mystery and science fiction writing. This is one of those tales that has a light, bemusing tone, but is pitch black and misanthropic at its heart. There are no winners here. Perfect for Hitchcock.
11 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Suicide is not amusing
film_poster_fan11 February 2019
Warning: Spoilers
The tone of this episode is light hearted, but the "hero" commits suicide at the end to get in the almanac. This does not make any sense and it gives the appearance that killing yourself is a subject for comedy which it most assuredly is not. This is the worst 25 minutes of television I have ever seen.
3 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed