"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" Not the Running Type (TV Episode 1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"Not the Running Type" and not the honest type either
chuck-reilly20 May 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Paul Hartman of "The Andy Griffith Show" fame, stars as a mild-mannered and inconsequential clerk who steals $200,000 from his company and then meekly turns himself into the police. Robert Bray and Bert Freed are the detectives who interrogate him fiercely because although he freely admits his crime, Hartman refuses to tell them where the money is. Even threatened with a long stretch in prison does nothing to dissuade this fellow, to the utter exasperation of Bray and Freed. They think he's off his rocker and reluctantly send him to trial where he's quickly convicted of Grand Larceny. So off Hartman goes to prison for fifteen years. He's out after 12 for good behavior, but not entirely off the hook. Upon his release, Detective Bray visits him and tells him that he's still liable for the $200,000 and will keep his eyes on him until its recovered. To his complete surprise, Hartman immediately fesses up where the money is hidden and is very contrite about the whole incident. Bray walks away thinking that Hartman's tour in prison must've made him a changed man---and in a way, he is. On a luxury liner heading to the South Seas a few months later, Hartman tells a fellow passenger about how he "invested $200,000" and that over 12 years the interest and profit came to a staggering $150,000. So there was method to his madness after all. This episode was directed by the prolific and talented Arthur Hiller who's still with us after all these years. The top-notch cast help move this little tale along without a hitch, culminating with Hitchcock's usual surprise ending---and not a dead body anywhere to be found.
23 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
A slowly pace but intriguing episode.
raymatsell3 February 2023
An humble and unremarkable clerk steals a lot of money over a long period of time but upon discovery quickly gives himself up to the police. Why ..... ?

I feel the other reviews are a little harsh on this episode. Certainly it is slowly paced and you wonder where it is going, but it has a delightful ending. So don't start watching and give up half way through. Hitchcock is as quirky as usual in the prologue and epilogue.

Like some AHP episodes it looks and feels a bit dated , but you just have to look past that at the story, and try to watch it as if you were watching in the early 60's when TV was not quite as sophisticated as today (well some modern stories are sophisticated and made with great production values, but there is a lot more dross today too.) Just watch it and enjoy it for what is is.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Lucky He Isn't Banking Today
Hitchcoc29 April 2023
Emmet the fix it man on the Andy Griffith show manages to embezzle 200,000 dollars from his company. He turns himself in but refuses to give back the money and goes to prison. The episode now moves to the day of his parole. We go through flashbacks. We have a detective itching to get that money back. But there is a scheme that is eventually revealed. I would imagine there would be so much more intensive surveillance now than the time of the episode. But it is a funny, low key episode, and though it travels at a snail's pace, we continue to wonder why he did it. It is eventually revealed to us and it is a bit of a feelgood thing.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
IT TAKES A THIEF WITH COMPOUNDED INTEREST.
tcchelsey10 February 2023
This episode has fascinated me for decades, and character actor Paul Hartman is perfect for the quirky part. He plays a sly bank teller called Potter who steals $200,000, turns himself in ---but never reveals where the mazuma is, see? Stasharooney.

This is, by far, not an original story and may have been inspired by actual events, toss in a seasoning of Hitchcock larceny.

The ending is NOT to be missed and so are Hitch's personal observations. By the way, the 200,000 dollars Mr. Potter "borrowed" would equal about 2.5 million today. This guy has nerves of steel!

Robert Bray is good as the befuddled detective assigned to the case. Witten by Jerry Sohl, who wrote 4 episodes for Hitchcock, but who majored in sci fi (STAR TREK )and horror films. He wrote two films for Boris Karloff. Classic stuff. SEASON 5 EPISODE 19 remastered CBS dvd box set.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Get busy living or get busy dying.
sheepandsharks20 August 2023
I love these quirky episodes with happy endings when they pop up. There isn't much going on in this one, but the performances are fun to watch and keep you invested. (The police roles are especially interesting to me, as they reflect many now-common tropes in police portrayals AND actual behaviors we see from cops in real interrogation videos.)

For sheer entertainment value, this episode is probably more of a 7. It got an extra 2 points from me for 2 reasons:

1. I actually had no idea where this one was going or what a possible twist might be. This rarely happens when I watch this show, so I'm delighted when it does! (Being too genre-savvy can be a curse.)

2. "Shawshank Redemption," anyone? There's a lot of Andy Dufresne in Mr. Potter! I wouldn't at all be surprised if Stephen King took inspiration from this episode for his story. He's done it before, with the Twilight Zone episode "A Thing About Machines" and his novel "Christine."
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Not the best trade off in my book.
classicsoncall1 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Would you trade your freedom for twelve years for a hundred fifty thousand dollar payoff? That's what this episode suggests, as mild mannered investment clerk, Milton Potter (Paul Hartman), embezzles two hundred grand from his employer, and promptly turns himself in to the police! All kinds of things wrong with this episode. Actor Hartman was in his mid-Fifties when he appeared in this story, and he looked it, but it was mentioned that he had worked at Metro Investments for thirteen years straight out of college. So unless he graduated when he was about forty years old, that idea wasn't very credible. With three years taken off for good behavior, Potter's release from his fifteen year sentence found him returning to the scene of the crime, so to speak, to return the original amount of money he stole. Seems to me if he had the intelligence to swindle a couple hundred grand unnoticed, he should have been smart enough to move up in his organization to make more money, and afford to put some cash aside each week. I mean, he worked for an investment company, he could have put the money to work earning compound interest and been a free man the whole time. Probably not a hundred fifty thousand, but still a nice chunk to go along with Social Security in his old age. One thing for sure though, the episode wouldn't hold water today, with bank interest rates much less than one per cent. But then again, a hundred fifty grand wouldn't go far either!
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A case where Hitchcock's introduction is much more interesting than the rest of the show.
planktonrules10 April 2021
This episode stars Paul Hartman as Milt Potter. Hartman was famous for his stage dancing act with his wife as well as playing Emmett, a very dull fix-it man on "Andy Griffith" and "Mayberry RFD".

The show begins with a police captain talking to his lieutenant about the strange case of Milt Potter, a seemingly dull and forgettable man who embezzled $200,000 and went to prison for it. But the odd parts to the story is that he freely admitted to stealing it and they never did recover the money. Here all that goes, well...who cares?!

The show is about a dull guy...but amazingly the story itself if pretty dull. Not a bad episode but one that really never excites the viewer. Pretty forgettable.
6 out of 19 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed