"Alfred Hitchcock Presents" The Baby-Blue Expression (TV Episode 1960) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
7 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
A decent episode...thought it's hard to imagine a person this ignorant.
planktonrules14 April 2021
The Barretts are a most unusual couple. Mr. Barrett is significantly older than his young wife. They also are unusual because Mrs. Barrett is conspiring with her lover to kill her husband! The plan comes apart, however, since Mrs. Barrett has the intellect of a zucchini! Why? Because she accidentally sends a letter which implicates her and her lover in the husband's murder. When she realizes this mistake, does she have a prayer of retrieving the letter before her plan is uncovered?

This is a decent episode, though to really enjoy it you need to suspend disbelief because both Mrs. Barrett AND her lover are really dippy....and only someone with a zucchini brain could do what they did. See the show and you'll see why these two aren't exactly master criminals!
16 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A change of pace for Sarah Marshall
cpotato10108 September 2018
I am most familiar with Sarah Marshall from one of my favorite TZ episodes, "Little Girl Lost", where she played the girl's mother.

I have also seen her in many other later TV shows, so it was interesting to see her play the "feather-brain", as her lover calls her.

That said, there was over-all very little to this episode after the letter is written.

Perhaps because it was only a half-hour show, less the Alfred Hitchcock wrappers, but the chase after the letter should have been longer.

The party seemed like an after-thought, rather than a part of the lover's plan. Again, perhaps because of the short run time.

Despite these objections, it was still fun to see Sarah Marshall in this role.
13 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Slippery Slope
Hitchcoc27 May 2021
This is one of those episodes where you actually want the young woman to get away with murder. But she does an incredibly stupid thing. It's then a race to get back a letter she sent which could get her convicted of conspiracy to commit murder. It's a classic plot played out nicely with obstructions all along the way.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Courtesy Can Kill
dougdoepke21 May 2010
Young Mrs. Barrett (Marshall) has a 100-watt body and a 10-watt brain, but she's also the pampered wife of an older business tycoon (Gaines) who also happens to have a handsome assistant (Walker). Naturally, 3 into 2 won't go, so hubby is not long for this world if only the intellectually-challenged missus can figure out how to mail a letter.

Marshall does a good kittenish version of Marilyn Monroe, and it's amusing to watch her figure out what a "smarmy" letter is like. I'm sort of surprised the screenplay didn't play up retrieving that incriminating letter more than it did. There's real suspense in post office red tape that keeps getting in the way. Nonetheless, her cocktail party diversion is a well acted and humorously scripted hoot with its decadent Manhattan types. No mayhem or chills here, just a good straightforward story topped off by the expected delicious twist.
26 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Good, but pretty much a rip off of the 1951 film "Cause For Alarm"
wswofsey2 April 2024
Warning: Spoilers
While this is a clever story, it is very similar to the 1951 film-noir thriller starring Loretta Young & Barry Sullivan. In the film Loretta Young's husband, Barry Sullivan, who is an invalid & bedriddden, asks her to mail a letter. She does this, not knowing that he suspects she is having an affair with another man & he's paranoid that she may kill him. Once she mails the letter he tells her the contents implicate her if anything should happen to him. In the excitement he has a heart attack & dies. She spends the rest of the film trying to get back the letter. From here on the plot is almost identical with a few minor changes. Personally I prefer the Loretta Young film over this episode, although it is good if you haven't seen the film to make the comparison.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Mrs. Barrett and Phillip are two peas in a pod
glitterrose13 July 2022
Cause if Mrs. Barrett is written as being a ditz, Phillip's right behind her.

So we have three main characters for this episode. Mr. And Mrs. Barrett. Mrs. Barrett might be married but she has her attention on Phillip and the feelings are mutal from Phillip's point of view.

Phillip's got a plan to get Mr. Barrett out of the picture. I do think he's got more brains than Mrs. Barrett but he's truly not far behind her. He writes Mrs. Barrett a letter and definitely implicates himself in what will turn out to be Mr. Barrett's murder. He lists a couple of instructions for Mrs. Barrett to follow while all this is going on. He wants Mrs. B to write Mr. B a swarmy letter. This is all very hard on Mrs. B because she doesn't know what swarmy means. She also thought Canada was overseas at the beginning of the episode. The second thing Mrs. B is supposed to do is throw a little get together. Mrs. B finally gets her swarmy letter written and she folds all the pages together (including the letter Phillip sent her!!) and off she goes to the mail box with it.

She gets back and it doesn't take her long to notice she screwed up. Where's Phillip's letter? She realizes it must be in the letter she sent her husband. She has to get her letter back! Her maid's getting canopies made for Mrs. B's get together while Mrs. B makes a mad dash around trying to get her letter back.

She ends up at the post office and she's told that mail's already out. She goes back home and tries to call her husband. She has all the hope that Phillip's plan failed. Nope, her husband isn't there. Needless to say, Mrs. B's got too much on her mind to be into her get together. Is a ray of hope for Mrs. B about to arrive? A man that works at the hotel says Mrs. B's letter came back. Mrs. B didn't put enough postage on the envelope. Mrs. B's hopes are crushed as she's told that he put more postage on the envelope and sent it back off.

I just adore this episode. It's an interesting storyline but I really want to give bonus points to Sarah Marshall (Mrs. Barrett). I loved the airy, ditzy voice she used for the character.
7 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
"Where's Toronto?"
classicsoncall14 January 2022
Warning: Spoilers
Hard to imagine someone could be such a dimwit, but 'Poopsie' Barrett (Sarah Marshall) gives it the old college try. Not so hard to imagine why her husband (Richard Gaines) married her because she fits the bill as the much younger and gorgeous trophy wife. And then there's the lover Philip (Peter Walker), who probably should have known better, but you know, not thinking with his brain. So Philip comes up with a scheme to off James Barrett which is never revealed because it involved a plane flight to Toronto on a business deal, and how he would have done it remained a question mark. But Poopsie followed up on Philips's suggestion to write a 'smarmy' letter to her husband at his Toronto location, but then includes Philip's own letter detailing their complicity in Barrett's murder. Not intentionally of course, but just refer to her status as a dimwit, or feather brain if you will.

Poopsie's mailing of the letter becomes a nightmare when she realizes what she did. Her frantic attempt to retrieve the incriminating post is interrupted by an afternoon cocktail party with people she mostly doesn't even know. Harry the bellhop (Lennie Weinrib) seemingly delivers good news when he lets Mrs. Barrett know her letter was returned for insufficient postage, but the smitten clerk did her a favor and re-mailed it with the proper amount.

My question - why the intrigue with Philip sending Poopsie instructions via mail? Couldn't he have just told her since he knew what he wanted to do. They deserved each other.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed