"Doctor Who" Day of the Daleks: Episode One (TV Episode 1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
5 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
The return of the Daleks after five years, in colour no less!
poolandrews11 March 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Doctor Who: Day of the Daleks: Episode One starts as an attempt is made on the life of Sir Reginald Styles (Wilfred Carter) at Auderley House, the chief representative of the UN who is shortly to fly to Peking & chair a peace conference to try & stop World War III breaking out. His secretary (Jean MacFarlane) informs the proper authorities who in turn inform UNIT & Brigadier Lethbridge-Stewart (Nicholas Courtney) who is ordered to investigate the claim & arrange protection for Sir Reginald. Because of the importance of Sir Reginald the Brigadier insists the Doctor (Jon Pertwee) join his investigation, once at Auderley House the Doctor & UNIT find evidence of a sinister plot involving time travel & futuristic laser guns not from this time period...

Episode 1 from season 9 this Doctor Who adventure originally aired here in the UK during New Year's Day in January 1972, it was the first story from Jon Pertwee's third season as the Doctor & as you can guess from the title it marked the return of the Daleks to Doctor Who after an absence of five years since they last appeared in the Patrick Troughton story The Evil of the Daleks (1967) & notably the first time British TV audiences saw them in colour. Originally worked on under several titles like The Ghost Hunters, Years of Doom & The Time Warriors the script by Louis Marks initially didn't have any Daleks in it but they were thrown in there to probably entice viewers to the new season. For a series where the lead character has a time machine the idea of time travel & it's possibilities have been largely ignored in favour of using the TARDIS as a means to get from 'A' to 'B' & little else, I suppose The Time Meddler (1965) is an exception but even that stayed in exactly the same location & time throughout. During this opening episode the Daleks are little seen, in fact they don't really do anything at all. There's a strong mystery element as various themes & intriguing possibilities are brought up & the script deliberately tries to keep the audience guessing & involved. At twenty five minutes in length it moves along at a nice pace & it's good solid Doctor Who fun.

Like during the previous seasons The Mind of Evil (1971) there's yet another world peace conference & yet again it's the Chinese who are causing concern. When Day of the Daleks went into production it was learned that only three Dalek casings were retained by the BBC & no more new ones were made so after a nice new paint job director Bernard only had three Daleks to work with at any one time & one of those was painted gold. One other notable aspect of the Daleks here are their annoying whiny electronic voices which irritate as they speak breaking their words up into very distinct syllable's. The Doctor notes in this that he once met Napoleon & gave him advice while both the Doctor & Jo are visited by their future selves at the start which is quite odd.

Day of the Daleks: Episode One is a good solid intriguing start to Doctor Who's ninth season & it sees the return of the most popular & famous of Doctor Who monsters in glorious colour for the first time.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A Classic Story Due To Its Genesis
Theo Robertson12 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Review Of All Four Episodes - Some Spoilers

Everyone considers the Daleks to be as much a part of the programme as much of the Tardis so much so that the general public think they've appeared far more often than they did . They might be shocked to know that Troughton only had two Dalek stories while Davison , Colin Baker and Sylvester McCoy only had one Dalek story each . Even the longest running on screen Doctor Tom Baker only had two Dalek stories and when Day Of The Daleks was broadcast it was their first appearance in almost five years

You can't blame producers wanting to sideline these iconic monsters of television . There's not a lot you can do with them . They trundle around screeching " EX-TER-MIN-ATE " whilst zapping anyone unlucky enough to get in their path . David Whittaker tried to do something different with them in his Troughton stories but effectively they're usually written as robotic tanks who enslave planets and their populations

The great irony with Day Of The Daleks is that it wasn't originally written as a Dalek story . It started life a year earlier by a Louis Marks script called The Ghost Hunters which went through several title changes before it became known as The Time Warriors about people from the future traveling to the 20th Century in order to stop a war . Whilst Marks was writing his script producer Barry Letts was pressured by BBC controller Huw Wheldon to bring the Daleks back so decided to introduce them to The Time Warriors to get season nine of DOCTOR WHO off to an audience grabbing start . The Daleks were added as an afterthought so how well you think it succeeds is a matter of opinion

As for myself I think the story works superbly . It has a very thought provoking plot about people from the future having to kill a 20th Century politician in order to stop a nuclear holocaust where the Daleks will become the new masters of Earth which seems to have been completely borrowed wholesale for James Cameron's THE TERMINATOR so much so you'll be left wondering why if Harlan Ellison can receive a big out of court payment then why couldn't Louis Marks receive the same recompense ? The lack of Daleks means the human characters are to the fore along with human elements . Episode three sees memorable character interaction with the controller chastise a subordinate with a threat that " You know what means . To you .... and to your family " along with a later scene where goads the controller with the incisive insult of " Hmmmm a family of quislings eh ? " Aubrey Woods as the controller gives one of the best and underrated performances the classic show has seen

The Daleks don't do much for most of the story . For the first three episodes they are confined to one set which when I originally saw the story as a child convinced my mind that Daleks couldn't go outside their home . This changes in the final episode where they and their simian mercenaries the Ogrons launch an attack on a 20th Century peace conference . Some fans complain that three Daleks and half a dozen Ogrons don't constitute much of an Army but I disagree even though Letts and director Paul Bernard are on record as being disappointed by the climax

This is a very impressive adventure from the early 70s , an era of the show best remembered for its scary monsters and colourful action . The reason it's so impressive is that it's somewhat atypical from its fellow stories in that it has a cerebral plot that uses the concept of time travel and the anomalies involved along with a subtext involving terrorism and political violence . Not too many TV shows considered family entertainment do this
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
There are many different kind of ghosts.
Sleepin_Dragon28 February 2021
The house of Sir Reginald Styles is under attack, from the future, but who and why?

It's the first time fans will have seen The Daleks since Evil of The Daleks, a five year break, but they're back, and in colour, and in need of strepsils.

It's a good watch, it's very atmospheric, it's well paced, it looks good, and it sounds..... terrible. This is what happens when someone is making a show, but doesn't know the history of it. Fortunately the Blu ray hides all its faults, the updated special effects and voices really do make a difference.

I really like the controller, and the operators, they look wonderfully sinister. The Daleks look great in colour.

There is some familiarity, we have the stuffy Sir Reginald Styles, a character type used several times in the Pertwee era, we have peace processes, and Chinese delegates, if does at times feel like we've been here before.

If I'm honest I prefer Pertwee's other encounters with Skaro's finest, but it's a good start, 7/10.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Amazing Special Edition puts right production deficiencies which were its only real problem
A_Kind_Of_CineMagic28 September 2014
Review of all 4 episodes:

Special Edition 10/10, Original version 9/10, Overall 9.5/10

The story and script of this 4 parter are terrific. Time travel, its possibilities and its complications are more up front and centre here than in any previous story. This is done superbly well and it predates The Terminator by over 10 years with its ideas of going back in time to change history and inadvertently creating some of the history you wish to change. Great ideas, well executed and with thoughtful and interesting dialogue as well as good action. Pertwee and UNIT are on form again with some great support particularly from the leader of the human collaborators working for the Daleks.

The story has the Daleks using alien 'minions' the Ogrons and human collaborators to conquer and control a future Earth and to pursue the human resistance. Both the resistance and the Ogrons/Daleks have equipment allowing them to travel in time into contemporary Earth at a time when UNIT and The Doctor are working to protect a vital world peace conference. Both sets of time travellers try to ensure their history goes the way they want and it is up to The Doctor to intervene.

The aspects which let this story down badly in its original form are almost entirely down to money and available resources. The Special Edition puts these right wonderfully. Effects for the time travelling, weaponry, tremendous 'exploding body' deaths etc. are massive improvements throughout every episode which helps a lot but more importantly the climactic battle is turned from a lame let down to a great triumph. Originally they could only use 3 Daleks and this is painfully evident making their attack look pathetic. The addition of seemingly large amounts of attacking Daleks makes the battle believable, impressive and exciting. This in combination with the effects save the story from being let down visually. However, as important as all that is, of perhaps even greater impact is the enormous improvement made to the Dalek voices. Originally the Dalek voices in this story were the worst ever in my opinion. The unimpressive voice sound and weak voice acting negatively impacts scenes they appear in and makes the Daleks involvement pointless and a hindrance to the credibility and enjoyment of the story. The Special Edition replaces these with the marvellous Nicholas Briggs performance of Dalek voices. This lifts the overall feel of the story by not just bringing the dialogue to life but making every Dalek scene electrifying. After their long absence this is the glorious return denied to them by the original productions problems.

I feel satisfied that these technical changes only serve to present what they originally intended and Pertwee's dislike for this story was based on these lame executions of great possibilities. The storyline, dialogue, characters and themes in this adventure were always absolutely brilliant as were Pertwee and his usual UNIT team. It was only technical shortcomings that held it back from 10/10 classic status. Now the story is presented in a truly classic form which the story, script and performances deserve.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Went The Day Well?
timdalton0076 May 2009
(Note: A review of all four episodes.)

When I discovered that one of my local public libraries had a massive collection of Doctor Who on VHS nearly two years ago this was the first story I checked out. After all it had my then favorite Doctor and the Daleks in it plus it had what looked like an intriguing story. So having seen many times since I find myself asking the question (which is also the title of an very good 1942 World War II film incidentally): Went the day well?

Well let's start by looking at the main cast members. Jon Pertwee gives as good a performance as the third Doctor as any other story, especially with some nice character moments in episode one. Katy Manning gives a nice if not adequate performance though she seems to fall rather too easily into the traps and machinations of the Controller. Nicholas Courtney, Richard Franklin and John Levenne all give adequate performances but nothing special about them here. In fact that could easily summarize the main cast members: adequate but nothing special.

The supporting cast favors much better. In particular the performance of Aubrey Wods as the Controller stands outs as his character makes a fascinating journey thanks to a crisis of conscience. Anna Barry, Scott Frederick and Jimmy Watson give believable performances as the guerrillas on a desperate mission to change history. Wilfrid Carter gives a fine but sadly underused performance as Sir Reginald Styles, the diplomat at the center of the story. There's also a nice cameo from real-life BBC reporter Alex MacIntosh in the final episode which adds some realism to the story. This story is one of the rare occasions where the supporting cast is better then the main cast.

The story is perhaps known as the return story of the Daleks after their apparent extinction in The Evil Of The Daleks back in 1967. Sadly though this was far from a grand return. the problem really is that the script wasn't written for the Daleks originally and it shows. For the first three episodes of the story the Daleks do little else but sit in a room issuing orders and then they finally move in episode four the results are less then great, particularly in the finale. Exaserbating the problem is the Dalek operation seems limited an unimpressive as a result. Worse yet is the voice work. The Dalek voices of Oliver Gilbert and Peter Messaline are by far the worst of the entire original series and one can only hope that when this story comes out on DVD the BBC will invest in having a special audio track for Nicholas Briggs or Roy Skelton to redo the voices. This story wasn't the Daleks finest hour and the story is hurt by it significantly.

Also other aspects of the production don't help. Dudley Simpson's music for the story becomes almost unbearable to listen to at times due to its volume and overuse of electronic elements in it. the editing of the story is a mixed affair with some really slow segments going on for too long (espeically the sequence with the Doctor and Jo at Styles' house). The story's biggest problem is direction of Paul Bernard which comes across as the director being uninterested most of the time. These elements all hurt the story and it never really recovers from these faults.

There are good aspects to the production though. The Ogrons are not only well designed but well acted as well, making them strangely more effective then the Daleks in this story. The design work of David Myerscough-Jones makes for nice sets which are complemented nicely. Then there's the script by Louis Marks.

If anything can be said about Day Of The Daleks it is that it has a fine script behind it. Marks deals with the issues of time travel paradoxes intelligently years in advance of other science fiction shoes and blends them well into a story about the world on the brink of World War III. When the story moves to the 22nd Century is becomes a familiar tale of a handful of people fighting to free themselves from oppression. While this has some echoes of The Dalek Invasion Of Earth in it and lacks the depth of that story, it still makes for some intriguing viewing. The script does have two problems: the Daleks (discussed above) and the fact that the ending leaves a few interesting strands of the plot loose. Those flaws aside Day Of The Daleks has one of the finest scripts of the Pertwee era.

With adequate performances from the leads, a nice supporting cast, poor Dalek usage, an overly loud score, slow pacing and uninspired direction plus well used Ogrons, well designed/lit sets and one of the best scripts of the Pertwee era we return to the question at the start of this review. So went the day well? The answer is average, yet it should have been better.
3 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed