"Thriller" The Mark of the Hand (TV Episode 1960) Poster

(TV Series)

(1960)

User Reviews

Review this title
10 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
"Do you think she's normal?"
classicsoncall12 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Most reviewers on this board for the early episodes of 'Thriller' seem to give them short shrift for their crime and mystery slant, but I'm finding them kind of interesting. Case in point is this one, 'The Mark of the Hand' which has a bit of a creepy plot going for it. Gold-digger Sylvia Walsh (Mona Freeman) manipulates a wealthy widower (Shepperd Strudwick) into an engagement, intending a quickie marriage and divorce, then splitting the divorce settlement three ways with her boyfriend Charles and his brother Paul (Berry Kroeger). Trouble is, Charles doesn't want to go along with the scheme, but as we see, he doesn't have much say in the matter.

With a slight revision in plans, Sylvia concocts a scheme to murder Charles and pin it on her fiancée's daughter (Terry Burnham). Paul's supposed to back up Sylvia's story about how Charles died, and the little girl is just going to lay back and take it because she's had some psychiatric counseling already over her mother's death. The psychological angle is given further credence because the father hasn't paid much attention to daughter Tessa since his wife died.

You know a shrew like Sylvia is going to get hers eventually, so you just have to sit back and let the story take it's course. Personally, I would never have come up with a second murder attempt using a butter knife by an eight year old, but what do I know. Somehow I just knew old Lt. Gordon (Judson Pratt) would be right around the corner to make the save. Poor Sylvia.

I recall seeing young Terry Burnham in any number of TV episodes as a kid, as I would have been her age back in 1960 when this show first aired. Just a few months earlier, she appeared in an episode of The Twilight Zone called 'Nightmare as a Child', a story with a somewhat supernatural bent in which she portrayed the 'subconscious' aspect of a grown woman who was the target of a murderer. Just to show you that lightning can strike twice, the actor who played the potential killer in that show was Shepperd Strudwick.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Just Too Much to Swallow
Hitchcoc7 November 2016
A man is killed, shot in the back. A little girl sits on a chair as the family arrives. She is holding a pistol, the murder weapon. We soon find out that this little girl has had a series of examples of anti-social behavior. Flattening a flower bed, playing with a gun before the one used in the crime. Soon she is the center of an investigation, but she decides to stop talking. A police detective must wade through a bunch of obstructionism by the family. One woman lies three times, saying she was only protecting the child. There is only one criticism but it is a big one. To orchestrate what happened in this setting would be beyond the pale. The convenience of the little girl clamming up, when she could have just told them what happened, is ludicrous. If I had never seen these shows when I was young, knowing that some are of high quality, I would have dropped out after this one. Just too high on the cheese factor.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Probably the best on disc one....not that this is a glowing endorsement.
planktonrules16 December 2013
I love TV anthology shows--especially the ones from the 1950s and 60s. I have watched quite a few of these lately--all either from DVDs from Netflix or from archive.org. However, after seeing disc one of "Thriller", I am apprehensive to get another. While you MIGHT think the shows are about the supernatural and are very similar to "The Twilight Zone", they are nothing like that--at least in the early episodes. I've read from one reviewer that the show DID later become like that--but I am not sure I have the patience to wade through any more mediocre shows like I just watched on disc one.

Of the five episodes on disc one, "The Mark of the Hand" might be the best...though this isn't exactly a glowing endorsement. It's interesting, though also rather predictable.

The show begins with a murder--and it appears as if a cute little girl did it. However, the family tries to stop or at least slow down the investigation by the police--and the police are not about to ignore a shooting just because a little kid might have done it.

As you watch this show, the viewer is led right to the plot twist--and you see it coming and can predict what will occur. This is very, very weak and despite some good performances, I can't see this as anything more than a time passer.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Silent Girl
AaronCapenBanner29 October 2014
Judson Pratt plays police Lt. Gordon, who is called into an unusual murder case where the prime suspect seems to be an 8-year old girl(played by Terry Burnham) who has steadfastly refused to speak on the matter, though a female witness claims that girl did indeed shoot the victim, and that she fears for her life to what may be a mentally unbalanced child, but all is not as it seems of course, and other suspects seem far more obvious... Dull episode is among the weakest, with a perfectly obvious mystery and too much talk, all leading exactly where you think it will. Good cast does what it can, but this was far from indicative of where the series was headed.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Solid point
NuttyBaby18 July 2023
Warning: Spoilers
This was a very good episode and worth watching it again. Not only was it a thriller but also a mystery. From the beginning, all was blaming the little girl for murder because she was found holding a gun. She was going through PTS or post traumatic stress after losing her mother and seeing a murder, seeing the killer, and being so frightened that she chose to be silent. All this was distressing to the kid. If you see this twice, you get to learn what is happening with the child and the effect it has. The real killer messed up by being too ambitious and cruel. I guessed it was them who did it anyway.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
"An instrument of murder is hardly a proper toy for an eight-year-old, as sure as my name is Boris Karloff."
Witchfinder-General-66617 November 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Generally speaking, I have become a huge fan of the 1960 Horror anthology series "Thriller" hosted by the iconic Boris Karloff. That being said, the first few episodes of the first season are rather cheesy and Horror-less affairs that must aptly be described as very un-mysterious mysteries rather than Horror. Fortunately, the makers of the series must have realized that, which is why the later episodes are almost entirely fantastic and very eerie Gothic tales. "The Mark of the Hand" is one of the early episodes, and indeed one of the most unspectacular ones.

After a gunshot is heard, the eight-year old Tessa (Terry Burnham) is found with a gun in her hand, standing next to the body of a dead neighbor. Even though the evidence seems to point to Tessa as the murderess, Lt. Gordon (Judson Pratt) has his doubts about her guilt. The girl refuses to say a word...

"The Mark of the Hand" is easily one of the most predictable and suspense-less "Thriller" episodes. It is obvious from the beginning that the little girl isn't the killer; and the friendliness of her future step-mother does seem very fake. Personally, I knew the exact outcome of the story after a few minutes into the episode. Overall, the most memorable part of "The Mark of the Hand" is the unintentionally funny introduction by Master Karloff. Apart from the terrible "Child's Play" (Season 1 Episode 2), this is one of the least recommendable episodes. My recommendation: watch some of the many great episodes ("Well of Doom", "The Terror in Teakwood", "The Return of Andrew Bentley",...) instead.
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
A mark of convoluted nonsense.
mark.waltz5 October 2019
Warning: Spoilers
Certainly, young Terry Burnham is made up to look a little bit nutty. She is a troubled young girl who is accused of murdering a next door neighbor, but it is soon revealed that this family is as nutty as she looks. There's a wheelchair-bound grandmother veteran actress (Jessie Royce Landis) neglectful father Shepperd Strudwick, cheating stepmother Mona Freeman and perhaps the only decent person in the household, nanny Rachel Ames.

Somehow, we are meant to believe that the young girl shot the neighbor in cold blood, and it is very apparent that some hanky-panky was going on between him and Freeman. This episode tries hard to emulate the film noir genre and really doesn't give enough detail in 50 minutes to explain everything concretely. the only really interesting scene is when the young girl tells police detective Judson Pratt that she refuses to ever talk again, but as we know about little girls, that promise is impossible to keep. I found myself fidgety and restless throughout the hour-long running time, and wasn't really surprised by the twists and turns at the end. Of the first four episodes, this is by far the weakest.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Mona Freeman is no Constance Ford
kevinolzak11 May 2008
Fletcher Markle's eight early Thrillers are all fairly weak but "The Mark of the Hand" has so little going for it that the second episode, "Child's Play," almost looks better by comparison. A gunshot rings out and standing over the corpse holding the murder weapon is an 8 year old girl who steadfastly refuses to comment on what happened, since she always seems to get into trouble no matter what she says. Shepperd Strudwick plays the worried father and Jessie Royce Landis plays the grandmother. Judson Pratt made a career out of playing police investigators like this one here (and also in 1958's "Monster on the Campus"), but it's up to him to keep interest from flagging. Every character is so clichéd and the climax so predictable that director Paul Henreid can do little with it. The little girl is played by Terry Burnham, who later appeared (unbilled) as another endangered child in episode 22, "The Fingers of Fear," finally giving up on her career by 1971.
10 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Too predictable
ctomvelu115 December 2012
"Hand" is one of the lesser crime-oriented Thriller episodes. A little girl is accused of murder, but refuses to say anything. The entire drama is played out in what we used to call a drawing room mystery, and thus resembles a stage play. Two recognizable actors, Shepherd Strudwick and Jessie Royce Landis, give it there best, but the whole enterprise falls flat. The little girl strongly resembles the little girl from "The Bad Seed," which I suppose could be coincidental. She also looks like the Wonderbread girl. The ending is way too obvious. Truth is, I frankly prefer the supernatural episodes over these old-fashioned crime dramas. Paul Henreid directed this as if it were shot in the 1930s.
4 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Boring and far-fetched
preppy-34 August 2014
A man is shot to death right at the beginning. A little 8 year old is believed the be guilty of his murder (she's holding the gun that shot him). But, for no good reason, the kid refuses to speak to anybody at all about anything. Did she do it or was it someone else? You'll probably figure it out long before the end.

This is from the first season on the "Thriller" TV series. I heard that the show was mostly supposed to be horror but I'm finding out it started out with mostly suspense dramas. That's unfortunately true and they aren't that good. This is, so far, the worst one I've seen from season one (I'm watching them in order). The script is pretty stupid with too many characters and lots of implausible elements--the kid not speaking doesn't even scratch the surface. To make it worse is there's some terrible overacting AND underacting (quite a feat that). A pretty dull 45 minutes. You can safely skip this one.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed