"Full House" Happy Birthday, Babies: Part 1 (TV Episode 1991) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
4 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Easily the worse of season 5
FriedToast0213 April 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Season 5 I pretty much enjoy all the way through. It's very easy to watch season and interesting with the twins taking up a lot of the second half of the season, with a lot of enjoyable episodes, but this episode doesn't do it for me. Flashback episodes I can like if they are done correct, but this one is just boring to be honest. It's just clips from different seasons of the show and it takes up way to much of the episode, I don't hate it, but I can easily skip it when I'm watching this season.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
How rude.
laudamee13 April 2019
I am not a fan of flashback episodes but unfortunately, most TV sitcoms have at least one of these throughout the whole series. Thus, it doesn't surprise me that Full House had to make one as well. However, that should not be an excuse for airing such an uninspired, dry, and unnecessary episode. Considering the fact that Michelle is my least favourite character, this episode was just a pain in the neck to watch.
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Meaningless "Best Of" Episode.
Movie-ManDan19 February 2019
You know shows episodes that mostly contain flashbacks? I hate that! It is just the writers lazying out thinking a compilation will make the audience have a good time like they did days or weeks before. It just makes it all redundant.

It is a mere hours before Michelle's fifth birthday party and they look at photos in her baby book. When that finishes, the newer things come.

Done!
1 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
YOU WANT US TO HATE MICHELLE!
ihala-391147 July 2020
I'm already sick of Michelle because season 4 and 5 were all about her! I wonder if the Olsen sisters were daughters of an important or dangerous man back then -.-
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed