Hanna (2011) Poster

(2011)

User Reviews

Review this title
573 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
7/10
Fairy Tale-ish, Odd- Action Film You Want to See
lestatbesa4 August 2020
As I watch this film, I already observe the unconventional treatment of this film in term of color toning. It is same as you watching a fairy tale-ish approach movie this film but it is an action film. Makes me feel it is a modern fairy tale movie with action-pack thrilling twist. The progression of the story is a bit inconsistent there is a high and low but manage to put a high marks on some scenes. The fight scenes well-choreographed but expecting more on the climax which it felt flat but got its mark. The location choice of filming is astounding. Marissa (Cate Blanchett) did a good job in this film, she is a wicked witch in this film and Hanna (Saoirse Ronan) is the princess. Another highlight in this film is musical score, I love how the tension build up by its sounds. It makes me feel that I am also part of this movie.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Beautiful. Don't let the negative reviews repel.
Joseph-Stevenson30 November 2011
I really wanted to watch this film but I didn't have the time when it was in theatres. So I recently treated myself to the Blu Ray copy. I decided to check the user reviews before watching it and was very surprised by the amount of negative feedback. The reviews were almost hate posts! So, I put the disc in with mixed expectations and afterwards, I sat, glued to the credits thinking "what was their problem?!" Truly a beautiful film. Don't set out expecting an action packed bad-ass picture (I think that was the problem with most of the negative reviewers). Though not as frequent as your everyday action film, the action scenes are just as exciting as ever. If you liked the fighting techniques in Taken, imagine a teenage girl pulling off moves just as hardcore, if not more. The visuals and sounds of the film are nothing short of artistic. I give it an 8 out of ten. Not the best film of 2011, but definitely not the worst.
130 out of 182 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Bad storyline coupled with great direction / camera / sound. Technically brilliant.
linustcr18 June 2011
A 'different' movie. Bad storyline coupled with great direction / camera / sound. Technically brilliant. The net result is quite enjoyable. One does have to suspend disbelief to take in the gaps in logic, but once you do that, it's a good ride.

The entire movie is in effect a large chase, and the direction has brought about this element superbly. The camera work and sound kept me glued.

There seems to be quite a few reviews that talk of all the gaps in logic and reasoning in the movie. They are all true, but I found the high levels of technical brilliance more than made up for it.

In the end, not a 'great' movie, but one that I nevertheless quite enjoyed.
195 out of 283 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Starts off as a good film, but ends up as a handful of good ideas, poorly strung together.
ced_yuen12 May 2011
Once upon a time, there was a little girl called Hanna (Saoirse Ronan), who was raised in a forest by her father Erik (Eric Bana). As an ex-CIA agent, Erik taught Hanna everything she needed: hunting, armed and unarmed combat, and all the languages in the world. One day, Hanna was sent out of the forest to assassinate Marissa Wiegler (Cate Blanchett), the woman who murdered her mother.

Joe Wright's latest feature is modern-day fairy-tale that is part revenge-flick, part coming- of-age drama. Like his last effort, 'The Soloist', 'Hanna' has some very good ideas that are let down by bad decisions and occasionally over-powering direction.

The film certainly has a very strong beginning. The concept of a killer child may be screwed- up, but this is offset by the curiosity it arouses. Why has Erik raised Hanna in this manner? Who is this woman they want to kill, and why did she become their enemy?

The storytelling is tight, intentionally drip-fed, which keeps the focus on the moment and makes the assassination plan more dramatic. Well, for the first 45 minutes. After that, Hanna sees the wider world for the first time and becomes distracted – which is both good and bad.

On one hand, it allows some insight into the effects of Hanna's blinkered upbringing. Having grown up killing her own breakfast and making her own fire, she is not prepared for her journey through the modern world. Seeing her flick light switches on and off in awe is one of several touching moments, which add a human side to what could have become another soulless gun movie.

However, Wright doesn't know when to pull back on the sentimentality. The film hits its low point when Hanna hitches a ride with a stuck-up English hippy family, which is meant to contrast the lonely, limited nature of Hanna's upbringing. Ironically, this family is even more dysfunctional than Hanna and Erik, and only succeeds in making Hanna's journey more irrelevant.

Her meticulous plan somehow becomes self-indulgent faux-art, featuring slow-motion Flamenco dancing. The film goes so off-course that it is questionable whether there was a plan in the first place. Is the story intentionally drip-fed, or is there just not very much to tell? For a child raised specifically to kill, Hanna doesn't end up doing very much.

That's not to say that there isn't any action. There are a handful of set pieces, and they are a delight to behold. From a fight in a subway to a chase through a labyrinthine cargo yard, the action is wonderfully shot and expertly edited. Long, tracking shots allow for a high level of clarity and immersion. Even this, however, is sometimes ruined with over-energetic camera-work, turning the film into a music video.

Saoirse Ronan is a good action star, throwing herself into her fight scenes with zeal, but her real strength is her acting. On one hand she seems so genuinely lethal that it's a little scary. At the same time, she has a delicate, innocent aura that makes it hard not to feel sorry for her. This is a layered performance that transcends the generic labelling of 'good' or 'evil'.

'Hanna' is not flawed, but sabotaged. Ronan is superb, and the action is fantastic, but even this is not enough to put the film back on course after Joe Wright steered it in the wrong direction. It started off as a good film, but ended up as a handful of good ideas, poorly strung together.
162 out of 218 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I can understand the negatives....but damn
acheroncreek18 June 2011
Warning: Spoilers
First of all, this is not a cerebral thriller, nor a Jason Bourne, or a James Bond. But it is one hell of a movie. I was on the edge of my seat the whole time, then fell back laughing once or twice. Many will say it was dreadful, but the truth is, it requires thinking once you walk out of the theatre. You might have to decide for yourself why the program of genetics was shut down, or why Erik had to be killed, but in truth the movie is about Hanna, and the way she adapts to new environments and a new life. Yes there are plot holes, but you can watch Gladiator and see utter wrongs done to the portrayal of the Romans, or Star Wars with its space opera plot holes. Yes Hanna is not perfect, not even Oscar worthy, but it makes for hell of an interesting movie.
29 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
cunning assassin vs. innocent girl
stanman2324 December 2022
This is a story about a unique and peculiar child named Hanna (Saoirse Ronan), on the run from presumably the CIA, finding out about herself and the world during a life-death struggle with a heartless American intelligence officer (Cate Blanchett). Blanchett scares as the cold and calculated killer spy trying to eliminate loose ends from an old case. Eric Bana is the protective father who excels at displaying the right emotions. The movie takes us from the serene and snowy arctic where Ronan grows up training to be an assassin to her travels across Europe with a quirky and clueless family on vacation to reach her target destination. We have an interesting performance by Tom Hollander as the evil accomplice chasing Ronan. An exciting ride.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Slick, thrilling, art-house action film.
gzuhgut27 February 2012
Having read some of the more negative reviews on this site, all I can say is that they all seem to have the same complaint in common. Namely, non-acceptance of certain plot contrivances.

So let me say straight off: if you are the sort of person who didn't like Inception because it made no sense, or the sort of person who didn't like The Matrix Trilogy because it made no sense, or indeed the sort of person who didn't like any of David Lynch's films because (ahem) NONE OF THEM MAKE ANY SENSE...in short, if you are an incurable pedant, you will not enjoy this film and you might as well stop reading this review. Seriously, stop reading, don't watch the film and go calculate Pi or something.

If, however, you have an appreciation for tightly-edited, emotionally engaging, aesthetically pleasing cinema with a brilliant soundtrack and at times breathless pacing, please allow me to take a few minutes of your time.

Hanna is the story of a teenage girl who lives in total isolation with her father. She has vague memories of her mother, and these memories, combined with her (literally) encyclopedic knowledge fuel her desire to leave the relative safety of her father's protection in the frozen hinterland of northern Finland.

In a way, I don't want to say any more than that. If you've read the other reviews on this site that give away more, then I'm very sorry for you, but if not then suffice it to say that her father's motivation for keeping her in this state of isolation appears to be protection, combined with a desire to train her in survival/assassination skills, in preparation for...well that would be telling.

Of course, you don't need me to tell you that she leaves her father's protection and the story proper begins. As Chekov said "One must not put a loaded rifle on the stage if no-one is thinking of using it" and boy, does that rifle get used.

Saoirse Ronan is brilliant as Hanna. At times seemingly invincible, at others pathetically vulnerable, owing to her complete inexperience of the world. We see the world from her unique perspective as she struggles to understand non-familiar interaction, the natural ease of recreation and even the basic electrical appliances that we all take for granted.

The story moves us from one location to the next, painting a rich tapestry of colour and culture, whilst simultaneously (and somewhat comically) contrasting Hanna's desperate need to traverse these territories with the bourgeoisie's seeming obsession with "experiencing" as many of them as possible.

The acting is solid throughout. The only truly great performance comes from Ronan, but Tom Hollander, Cate Blanchett and Eric Bana all turn out good performances that serve the picture well.

However the true credit for this film has to be laid at the feet of Joe Wright. None of his previous films could possibly prepare you for Hanna. Wright's mastery of both a tight, intricate plot such as in Atonement, combined with his incredible skill in making this beautiful, thoughtful, action-packed coming of age story mark him out as a director of real class.

It is true that Hanna suffers from a few plot holes, but that plot is delivered in such an appealing, exciting and above-all entertaining film that anyone who isn't compiling continuity errors for some god-awful TV programme that relishes in the fact that THIS ISN'T REAL LIFE, IT'S ACTUALLY ONLY A FILM!! should have a blast letting this film take them along for the ride.

If you want reality, watch a documentary. If you want a very good fiction, watch Hanna.
254 out of 346 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
I enjoyed this movie, but ... Warning: Spoilers
First, I'm just an average viewer, not a fledgling movie critic, and these are just some random observations I had while watching.

The main actors are all accomplished, and the movie contains interesting scenes in Finland, Morocco, and a derelict German amusement park. The soundtrack by the Chemical Brothers was different, varied, and fit some scenes very well- IMHO, especially duringHanna's escape from the underground military facility somewhere in the Moroccan desert, and a weird, sort of David Lynch-ian scene of weirdos loitering in the Berlin bus station. Cate Blanchett's ultra-sophisticated poisonous green Armani wardrobe sometimes held my attention as much as the plot; (I mean, maybe her side job as an assassin helped pay for those $800 green kidskin gloves.) And about the plot. Okay, suspension of disbelief and all that - but I kept wondering, if Hanna wanted to experience the world outside of the arctic, why didn't she (and Eric, for that matter) just go? They'd been off the grid for 15 years, and no one was actively looking for them; they could have slipped away and lived for months or years anonymously anywhere. Instead, inexplicably, they decide to trip an ELT locator beacon, and immediately alert Marisa Weigler as to their whereabouts. It was such a 'duh' moment, that I kept thinking about it throughout the movie. That being said, I still watch it whenever it's on cable, so I'll admit it's fairly good, despite any flaws.
5 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
A pure gem
UniqueParticle12 June 2020
I'm appalled this got hate at all Hanna is so awesome! Before Saisore Ronan was super known she was in this badass action aficionado, well filmed and slick soundtrack. Almost feels like a Luc Besson action flick with different style. So much captivating fun throughout, it's such a pleasant surprise for the ones that would appreciate it because it's quite a treat to me! I disagree with the few flaws I think there're voided out by the last half.
32 out of 42 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
the review that writes itself
A_Different_Drummer7 September 2015
By an odd coincidence in the same year this film was released another film of a similar type came out, Columbiana.

Both at their core are stories of young women in a life they do not want doing things to people they do like. Neither is an Oscar winner, nor even near Oscar territory.

Hana has an astonishing cast. Ronan found an chance to let audiences around the world learn she can hold the camera with those amazing eyes of hers. Bana never gave a bad performance in his life. Blanchett however treated us to the worst American "accent" in the history of film and a character overall that had no credibility. Not her fault. It was written that way.

But I digress.

The point is that if you are going to try to do one of these films, than don't outthink the audience or yourself. Just do it. Columbiana with a lesser known cast (and less of a following) is the far superior film.

HANNA gets an A for effort, but seriously at some level in Hollywood the people paying the bills should insist on reading the script before they start writing checks.
24 out of 41 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Wow, was this a waste of money
MFFJM218 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
This film was derivative of many other films including (Soldier, Resident Evil), with little new in the way of plot. The immoral CIA creates a program in which they are attempting to genetically create the perfect soldier by fooling with the DNA of embryos. When the experiment proves successful (huh..? Why shut down a successful program..?) it is decided for unknown reasons to end the project and terminate all those involved. Eric Bana, the CIA field agent who recruited the women for the experiment has a change of heart and tries to save one woman and her child. For no particular reason, except to give Hanna a reason to want revenge later on, the mother is killed by Kate Blanchett, and Eric Bana escapes with the infant. Bana raises Hanna as his own in an "arctic" cabin without electricity or modern conveniences, in order to prepare her for the day that she has to face the CIA and their henchmen. The day finally arrives when Hanna decides that she is ready. Bana digs up a transponder he had buried and places it in front of Hanna quipping that once the switch is flipped it can't be undone. Since there is no electricity in the cabin, and in fact Hanna has never seen an electric light, the method by which Bana got a battery to operate after over 14 years is never explained. Bana leaves Hanna alone to be captured by the dastardly CIA operatives. He did this apparently in order for Hanna to kill Kate Blanchett. Why he doesn't take Hanna with him, instead of leaving her to be taken by the CIA is left unexplained. Hanna is brought to an underground holding cell, the size of the Superbowl, in Morocco.

Strangely, Morocco looks a lot like the desert southwest of the US. Naturally, Hanna is more than a handful for the loutish CIA operatives and manages to escape through the ubiquitous air-conditioning vents which just happen to be her size. She makes her way to the surface, and just as she is looking out of a vast desert vista in broad daylight, Hummvees start driving directly over her head, apparently oblivious to the fact that there is an open submarine door in their path. As the last Hummvee passes the hole is shown as empty clearly showing that Hanna has managed to take hold of the undercarriage of the last vehicle as it passed at 50 mph, where she hangs on similar to Robert De Niro as Max Cady in the 1991 film "Cape Fear". Too bad nobody told the director about this same treatment by the "Simpsons" with Sideshow Bob. I'm sure I'm not the only one surprised by the location of Morocco for this CIA detention cell, instead of somewhere in the US. It becomes obvious later on when Hanna has the opportunity to show off her dexterity with languages, which wouldn't have come up in the US quite so easily. Also, since it was decided by the Director to have the final fight scene in an amusement park in Germany, the CIA detention center had to be someplace from which Hanna could conceivably get to Germany, without a passport or any ID.

At one point in the film Eric Bana picks up a post card at a post office, apparently where they've been holding his mail for the past 14 years, and there's a postcard from Hanna telling him in code she has killed Kate Blanchett, which is unfortunately incorrect. How she bought the stamp, mailed the postcard, or knew which post office Bana would be near is unexplained. The fact that all of this action takes place in a matter of a few days, makes the idea that a post card can get from Morocco or Spain to Germany in that amount of time laughable to anyone who has lived overseas.

There are several editing or continuity errors, like when Hanna kills the reindeer with a bow and arrow, but then guts a reindeer of approximately half the size, and then brings the originally sized reindeer home on a sleigh, apparently having made the sleigh from the raw materials by hand.

The choice of where and when to use blood spatter effects is also interesting. Hanna gets her face splashed when shooting people, and the picture in front of grandma gets covered when Kate Blanchett kills her (again for no reason), but the reindeer is remarkably without blood, even though Hanna is in the process of gutting it.

If you can willingly suspend your disbelief for this film, then you really have no disbelief to suspend.

The story is derivative, the characters are two dimensional and without motivation, the lines are full of clichés, and the violence is unrealistic. Eric Bana is supposed to be the Zen like trainer of Hanna, but he can't seem to handle a Aryan Brotherhood with a knife. I suppose 12 year old girls will like the scene where Hanna flips a Spanish boy who tries to kiss her, but her reactions were closer to that of someone suffering from anti-social personality disorder than of a normal teenager.

The fact that Hanna kills people for little or no reason would seem to suggest that she is in fact meant to be characterized as a serial killer, except that she announces to Eric Bana that she doesn't want to hurt anyone anymore, when all she really needs to do is to stop hurting people.

I found it disconcerting that Eric Bana had spent 14 or so years training Hanna to kill everything that moves, when the CIA was unaware of his or her actual existence. He could just as easily have changed his name and raised Hanna on a ranch in Idaho or a tenement in the South Bronx, but then there wouldn't have been as much of a story, as such.
402 out of 652 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Saoirse Ronan makes her presence known.
PCC092120 September 2020
This is a sleek, slick, entertaining film about a young woman (Saoirse Ronan), living in the snow-covered woods of Finland, who realizes, her father (Eric Bana, quite well I might add), an ex-CIA man (who has trained her to do combat, self defense and all kinds of killing), is not really her father at all, but a man who rescued her from the lab experiment that created her originally for this assassin lifestyle that the scientists meant for her. She makes a decision to go out into the world on her own, but she faces great danger revolving around a dangerous intelligence officer (Cate Blanchett). Everybody has a secret and that is what comes to light as the movie and the chase moves on.

This is a film with a nicely built structure, beautiful cinematography, breath-taking locations and a fantastic editing job highlight some of what makes this film quite good. The film opens and closes almost the same way and there is an interesting angle involving the fact that Hanna has never heard music in her life, but her "mother" was a singer. It brings an interesting contrast to the rest of the key elements in the film. The action scenes are stimulating. I only saw a couple of mistakes. It has a wonderful soundtrack and the film is put together real nice. Hanna is a 16 year old kid, who is brought into the world very grown up and it is interesting watching her naivete and her smarts collide together.

8.5 (B+ MyGrade) = 8 IMDB
14 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
An uneducated opinion
arus_royus28 August 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Call me simple if you like ;). Statement: The movie is (inadequatley stated) trash. One moment she is in Arizona (Morocco doesn't look like this, second point there aren't huge underground American air bases in Morocco) next she is in north Africa. Also the story is pointless and over dramatic. Visiuals and camera movement and the soundtrack are quite gripping, though. It might have made better in a Sci-Fi setting. Also it is physically impossible for a girl of such a light frame to have this kind of strength... Anyway, each to his own. Also it wasn't that entertaining P.S. Littl girl obsessions...some directors just have them.
12 out of 21 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Good for a little while, but then...
judywalker212 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
I became interested in seeing Hanna because of the trailers. I am a fan of Eric Bana and Cate Blanchett also. I expected more than I got. It was good at first the set up with Hanna and her father; the bad lady chasing them. It was the usual super human person escaping harm through their strength and wits. I enjoyed the part when Hanna reaches the real world and the time she spends with regular people, especially a normal, annoying English teenager and her free spirit mother. But then the film deteriorates into one chase scene after another; one scene of stylized violence after another. After so much chasing and so much killing the ending becomes anti-climatic. 5/10
87 out of 139 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Come and find me
Vishal_s_kumar19 September 2011
Warning: Spoilers
What is Hanna? it certainly isn't what I thought it'd be. At all. Chances are it isn't like anything you've seen before. Weird, wild and beautiful, it's Jason Bourne by way of the Brothers Grimm, David Lynch by way of Hans Christian Andersen, Luc Besson and Tom Tykwer by way of huntsmen, evil witches and big, bad wolves. It doesn't hesitate, it hurtles along. It doesn't flinch, it charges. It prowls and pounces, haunts and disarms. It has a pulse, a heartbeat, a rhythm. It roars. It cackles. It sings a lullaby. It hums. It whistles. And, really, you should stop reading right there. The joy is in the discovery, as they say, and Hanna is best served with as few expectations as possible. Whether you ultimately find it baffling or bewitching is, frankly, beside the point. It's well worth watching -- experiencing, rather -- and you'll be hard- pressed to deny the thrill of such a bizarre, breathtaking ride.

Once upon a time there was a very special girl named Hanna Heller (Saoirse Ronan). Since she was two-years-old, Hanna has lived in the secluded forests of Finland with her father, Erik (Eric Bana). There, she's learned to survive, hunt, fight... and kill. When she turns sixteen, her father decides she's ready to hear the truth and to be presented with a choice: continue living in seclusion or flip a switch on a dormant tracking device and alert a vindictive CIA chief, Marissa Wiegler (Cate Blanchett), to her whereabouts. It seems Marissa has been searching for Erik and Hanna since she failed to assassinate the pair fourteen years ago, and Hanna is all too anxious to meet the woman who murdered her mother and sent her father into hiding. The choice is simpler than Erik had hoped. Hanna flips the switch the moment he steps away from the cabin. And then? Then all hell breaks loose. Hanna, captured and taken to a CIA facility in Morocco, kills a woman she believes is Wiegler, steals intel about her true origins, escapes into the desert and hitches a ride with a family of tourists bound for Germany, where she plans to rendezvous with her father. But she'll have to stay one step ahead of Marissa in a strange, alien world of television, traffic and the internet, and dodge the CIA witch's fiends, led by the maniacal Isaacs (Tom Hollander).

Hanna leaps over vast genre chasms with the grace of the fully realized dark-fantasy, action- thriller hybrid it is. Director Joe Wright has created something so wholly in tune with his vision, so true to its own delirious delights and hard-hitting flights of fancy that it floats high above the Hollywood fray. It begins simply enough, explodes soon thereafter, and then slowly reveals its secrets and intentions with meticulous precision, descending into increasingly offbeat, grotesque territory only after enchanting viewers with its siren call. Wright pushes, sure. But he knows exactly how much to push his audience at any given moment. He challenges convention, but knows just how much pressure to apply. He demands a lot of those watching the film for the first time, but never more than they should be able to bear. (And Hanna is even better on repeat viewings.) His mad-hatter action opera doesn't overwhelm or overreach; it hypnotizes, mesmerizes and casts a spell with fierce fist fights, coming-of-age tenderness, cruel villains, audaciously long tracking shots (complete with brawls sans cutaways or cheap edits), dazzling photography, and organic electronica (from The Chemical Brothers, no less).

Ronan doesn't buckle beneath the weight of Hanna or Hanna, and approaches every scene with the same killer instinct her adolescent assassin approaches an assailant. Wright and Ronan seem acutely aware of how easily the film could plummet over the edge and adapt (or die) accordingly, creating a young protagonist both beyond her years and subject to childlike awe. (Hanna squeals with girlish excitement at the sight of a passing plane mere moments after gutting a deer and battling her father on a frozen lake.) Elsewhere, Blanchett gobbles down helpless scenes with toothy vehemence and devilish zeal (she's the Wicked Stepmother, the Foul Enchantress and the Evil Queen), Hollander licks his deranged chops and bears his fangs with sick pleasure, and Bana brandishes his best Bana -- the somber but soulful soldier -- and lends balance to an eccentric ensemble. The travelers Hanna joins -- a family played with flaky bohemian funk by Jason Flemyng, Olivia Williams and kinetic ball of energy Jessica Barden -- may be the straw that crack some filmfans' backs, but their presence is only jarring initially and only the first time through. Further viewings (and a bit of patience) illuminate their true purpose -- no wandering fairy tale princess would be complete without a band of quirky creatures and peculiar new friends, be they dwarfs, talking forest denizens or free- spirited European hippies -- and make them every bit as essential to Hanna as anything else. It's through her temporary surrogate family that she learns things her father neglected to teach her, for reasons that become painfully clear as the film nears its endgame.

But not everyone will be so forgiving. Hanna is a divisive genre-bender that will infuriate as many cinephiles as it entrances. Even if you and I typically see eye to eye, we may not this time around. Wright's fourth feature film defies expectation and explanation, and must be seen to be believed. It may not ensnare you, but it'll sink its claws in for two spellbinding hours. Hanna will probably make its way onto my Top Ten list this year, and it will undoubtedly find its way onto some of your lists as well, albeit as one of the Worst Films of 2011. You'll just have to brave its dark, demented forests to find out.
100 out of 143 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
A misleading trailer and mishmash of different genres will leave most viewers disappointed
mikhail00712 April 2011
From the trailers Hanna looks like Bourne series with a young girl as a heroine. However, there is not much action in this movie and the action scenes that are present are not that great. The fighting is not choreographed well and camera angle is switched often during the sequences to hide this fact. This leaves you let down and nauseous. This movie is a more of a coming of age story with a target audience of adolescent girls. This makes Hanna a very bizarre combination of genres that will likely disappoint both action flick lovers and people who enjoy more watching drama movies.

Overall I would rate this movie meh (with a shrug of shoulders). Maybe rent it when it comes out on DVD and forget about it.

5.5/10
17 out of 33 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Unclear "mission" left me somewhat disappointed
kschang773 April 2011
Watched Hanna at a sneak preview screening in San Francisco. Overall, the movie is fine, though the unclear character motivation was a bit confusing and detracted from the overall enjoyment.

The character of Hanna (Ronan) seem to be influenced by quite a bit of anime, but certainly fresh for American mainstream cinema. Miss Ronan did a good job switching between the soldier's "thousand yard stare" and the wild-eyed wonder of a child who had not seen the world (though heard/read about it). It's also refreshing to see a girl who did not use a single bit of sexuality to do what she needs.

The character of Erik (Bana) is a general Bourne-influenced tough guy, nothing else came across. He's a secondary.

The character of Marisa (Blanchett) as a ruthless "heavy" is... rather one-dimensional. She's the primary heavy, but she recruited a bunch of secondary heavies along the way.

The action sequences are generally made quite well, with good hand-to- hand combat sequences, but there's a bit too much MMA / Wrestling moves like flip / body slam. Not quite enough gunplay or weapons play, IMHO, but it's still interesting.

The main problem I have with the movie is about character motivation. What exactly was the protagonist's mission? Was it simply to kill ________? If so, why? There was zero hints on what she's "ready" for, or why. They could have fixed that with only a sentence or two.

Same with the antagonist. What was her motivation?

The motivations are the biggest problem in this movie.

There were also a couple goofs (one's already documented) that I have issues with.

Overall, the movie is enjoyable, if you can rationalize the mission, the motivations and its aftermath.
22 out of 46 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Action movie unbelievable shock! Get over it and watch pure film.
basilisksamuk4 March 2012
Let's get the obvious out of the way, shall we? The plot is derivative of so many other things it's not true, with Nikita being the obvious reference point. The acting isn't particularly strong, the script is barely adequate and the plot is neither internally coherent nor believable. In other words it's like every other action film ever made from Bond to Bourne and all points between. So what was everyone expecting who went to see this movie? Shakespeare?

On the other hand I would rate this as one of those rare experiences of seeing pure film. That is to say that there is the perfect marriage between image and music that makes it something quite different to the normal. The composition and direction of this film are really quite extraordinary with scene after scene catching the eye and making the commonplace clichés of the action genre seem fresh. The choice of music is inspired and the way that is has been synced to the action serves to heighten the tension in the scenes.

The film also manages to avoid the usual problem of over-reliance on CGI with the effects that are used being spare and for a reason. At one point we have a chase and fight in a container port and I was expecting the worst. Where did this scenario come from? I suspect it was one of the early Dirty Harry films and the container port shootout/chase has since become a compulsory element in all bad action movies and features in multiple episodes of TV thrillers. In 99 times out of 100 it's lazy, it's boring and it's the same as every other one you've seen. Well Joe Wright has done the seemingly impossible by making his container port scene exciting and different.

Look, you're not going to learn the meaning of life or even the meaning of the plot by watching this movie. If you enjoy cinema however, and by that I mean the use of images, light and music to propel the story then I think you'll like this.
58 out of 84 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
OK, but not great.
awaite-24 April 2011
Honestly I didn't know what to expect going into this film when I was granted a sneak peek tonight. Can anyone tell me if this film is based on a graphic novel of some sort because this is the feel that I felt it had the whole duration. I'm sure after viewing this film, many people will draw a very easy comparison between Hanna and La Femme Nikita (which in my opinion is a much better film as a whole).

If you go to see this thinking that it is full of action, you will be disappointed. While there is enough action to keep you interested, most of the film is based solely on character development in relation to the title character with little regard for developing the back stories of any of (what should seem important), supporting characters. I'm not suggesting that in-depth character development is bad, in fact I feel quite contrary , however when the the entire fate of a film rests in the hands of a singular character, I find these films usually fail and unfortunately I would suggest Hanna shares that fate.

On a positive note, when the supporting cast of Banna and Blanchett are allowed to shine they do so nicely enough. Also kudos to the cinematographic team for some nice scenery shots.
18 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Dangerous things come in small packages...
Fella_shibby3 April 2022
I first saw this in a theatre in 2011. Then again few years later on a dvd which i own.

Revisited it again online as me n my family is watching Hanna, the tv series on Amazon Prime.

The movie starts off in a desolated jungle mostly frozen due to the winter. Some amazing photography.

Then we get to see some good combat training and general knowledge training.

The tunnel fight sequence where Eric Bana's character takes down 3 men is well choreographed.

Hanna's chase sequence (on containers n the way she takes down a man with a knife) is tension filled n well shot. Some top notch Pencak silat.

The character of Isaac, a hitman hired by CIA agent who can't even complete his job but keeps on whistling, is a bit irritating.

What was the need to kill the old man in Morocco.

Why the character of Blanchett is repeatedly shown cleaning her teeth and that too with instruments (dental scaler) straight from a dentist's clinic is beyond me.

Why Sebastian's family is interrogated when the entire mission is unofficial is again a bouncer.

And what happens to the family is also not shown.
22 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Powerful yet subtle - beautiful, dark, edgy film married to a tightly paced score
nikspitz11 February 2016
A femme fatale, action, fairy tale adventure with a twist.

Modest, but effective in it's scenes of violence which are crafted with a restraint rare in 21st Century film making. This is a terrific adventure into a curious underworld and some first class film making.

The cameos of the cultures in the countries through which our protagonist passes on her quest offer a delicious contrast to the well paced action and drama, enriching the story though not central to its arc. Performances from Saoirse Ronan vs. her nemesis Cate Blanchett are powerful, the Irish actress Saoirse as the naive but lethal young German girl particularly engaging.
7 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
How does this film obtain a 7.7 rating? 7.7 Oh, please!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Geff23 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Contains spoilers: This film, Hanna, was god-awful. I was angry when I left the theatre after ruining my afternoon watching a film with such a stupid, faulty plot. There are just too many mistakes and holes. Hanna is a 16 year old ANOREXIC-LOOKING supposed genetic super human. Right away you know the casting is all wrong. She looks so weak. Sometimes she kills commandos immediately, and then other times she fights with skin-head caricatures for hours it seems. Silly stuff. To view this film's comments, use the "hated it" filter. I think the film's cast and backers shamelessly used IMDb.com for their selfish, untrue, and dishonest promotion of the film. No one with half a brain would recommend this film. There are plot holes which should anger you. Also, we are never told why she has to die or why the skinny little girl is a threat to US security. Why does she look longingly, lesbian-like into her new friend's eyes as they are lying in bed together? What happens to that girl and her family? We are not told. What did her foster-father ever do to deserve such treatment from her at the end? He then sacrifices his life for her! She has knowledge of everything in the world, but acts like one of the Beverly Hillbillies when it comes to turning on a light or using electric appliances, but then she just walks into a computer/coffee café and goes online. This is one of the dumbest films of all time. I was just so angry to have wasted my time and money on this film that was rated so highly on IMDb. Why does this film deserve a 7.7 rating? 7.7 Oh, please. Something is really, really wrong with the ratings system if this can happen.
331 out of 591 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Not what I expected but .... WOW!
kristin_riding29 March 2011
A friend got me tickets to an advance screening, telling me it was a spy thriller with Eric Bana and Cate Blanchett. I hadn't seen a trailer and was expecting something along the lines of Mission Impossible. Was I wrong.

I'm not great at doing reviews, but I feel I need to say something about this amazing movie! During it, I was very aware at how engrossed I was, hanging on every scene. It was visually stunning - some of the scenes or transitions between them were so beautiful. The title "HANNA" on the screen reminded me a lot of Kill Bill. In fact, I felt Saoirse Ronan's Hanna is a teenage version of The Bride from Kill Bill and Leeloo from The Fifth Element.

I've seen Cate Blanchett in a couple of movies, but was impressed by her portrayal of a ruthless agent. I hate to say that Eric Bana's character (Erik) was "almost" forgettable - in the end, the movie was really not about him. But he did show up once wet and without much clothing and that was just fine by me.

I am not a fan of violence (and Tarantino's bugs me a lot), but I was OK with the quantity and visibility of it in this movie. Fans of Kill Bill should enjoy Hanna.
260 out of 452 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Hanna: A fine piece of cinema
Platypuschow16 January 2018
Hanna tells the story of a man who raises his daughter to be an assassin, when the mission comes around however will she be ready?

This multi award winning critically acclaimed thriller stars Saoirse Ronan, Cate Blanchett & Eric Bana. Ronan once again steals the show and demonstrates again why she is one of the most talented actresses in Hollywood.

A thrill ride without being a dumb action movie in many ways it reminded me of Taken (2008) as it has much heart and certainly some smarts behind it.

Made as a collaboration between American, German & British production companies I can see why it is held in such high esteem. Though I didn't exactly find it revolutionary it is undeniably a well made film.

Solid cast, great writing and highly fitting score this is well worth anybodys time.

The Good:

Well scored

Ronans performance

Well written piece of cinema

The Bad:

Blanchetts accent

Things I Learnt From This Movie:

Ronan makes everyone else look bad by comparison
6 out of 10 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Inconsistencies, Plot Holes Galore_Gets Ridiculous in Berlin!
ladymoonpictures8 April 2011
Warning: Spoilers
Spoilers: See first! First off, what's with these so called expert killers Kate brings into the mix to get the girl? There fat, out of shape and more like clockwork orange hoodlums, that couldn't win a bar fight let alone beat a superior, fighting hybrid! If all the hybrids (for a lack of a better word) had to be 'terminated' and Hanna was the last left, think about this..., here's Kate keeping up with her, in heels! chasing her and Hanna was not able to put distance between them? The point is: If that's all the hybrid can do, WHY does the U.S. have to see her dead? (Obviously, she's not all that bloody superior if that old, British broad is out thinking her! And how do the clockwork orange goons ever find her in Morrocco? Was that the ONLY seedy, little joint in the whole country that the lugs somehow knew that's the one she'd be at? Give me a break.

Why doesn't it reveal whether the British couple and their kids were killed or not? Anyone who can jump onto an undercarriage of a Humvee while traveling over them at speed is frankly, CARTOON! And WHY does Eric, after waiting 13-years in hiding near the Arctic Circle, with a beard and long hair, suddenly cut his hair/have to look...EXACTLY like his file photos, to be instantly recognizable when he leaves the forest? Senseless. And oh BTW, he leaves in suit in sub zero temps. Hello~

What in the world were Kate's gums bleeding for? It has nothing to do with the plot at all! When Eric fights the 3 guys in the vacant space, when the thugs after incredible hesitations, finally do decide to fire their weapon, Eric had time to through one of them into the line of fire and throwing a knife to kill the gunmen. To coin a classic line from Eli Wallach about clowns just like these losers..., "If you're going to shoot...SHOOT. Don't talk!" Great acting by Hanna, for sure!
226 out of 400 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed