User Reviews

Why didn't Kirkland ask Lennon who Red John is before killing him? It makes no sense unless it has to do w/ time and having to kill him in revenge for his (Bob's) Mom was more important. OR, he was banking on Jane to find RJ FOR him. Still, I think it's a flaw in the story . . .

I agree with the reviewer who mentioned the mistake with the ending. I fully expected Kirkland to torture Lennon to reveal Red John's identity, but instead he killed him - maybe because Red John ordered him to. He appears to be a member of the Blake Association but I don't recall any mention that Kirkland joined only to avenge his twin brother's death. I still don't understand Red John's motive for killing Kirkland's brother - or Lorelei's sister. Just to remove loyalties? That would be ironic, because two once-loyal members now want to kill him. Why didn't the writer's see the benefit of an alliance between Kirkland and Lorelei? He certainly knew why she wanted Red John dead. It's crazy to me to have so many loose ends on the mythology aspect of this show. Here's an interesting thought, wouldn't it have been reasonable that a member of the Blake Association would blow the whistle on the conspiracy because they couldn't live with it anymore? I could record a video confession and get it in the hands of a reporter without anyone being able to stop it.