"On Death Row" Conversation with Linda Carty (TV Episode 2012) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Conversation With Linda Carty
a_baron5 September 2016
What is the fascination with Linda Anita Carty? If a man had planned the crime she did - a faetal abduction - and committed the crime she did - smothering a young mother to death in the trunk of a car - he would have been convicted, sentenced and forgotten. No one would have cared if he lived or died, and if he had been sentenced to die as was Carty in Texas, no one aside from the usual anti-death penalty crowd would have paid the slightest attention. But Carty is a woman, and as the DA who prosecuted her says in this film, she is articulate, convincing, and most of all manipulative.

Werner Herzog makes it clear he is opposed to capital punishment, but he does not allow ideology to blind himself to the reality of Carty's guilt. Sadly the same cannot be said for Carty's pro bono lawyer Michael Goldberg, nor for her daughter Jovelle, who must surely know the truth, both of them.

Herzog does not speak to Carty's original lawyer Jerry Guerinot, but I did about the same time this film was released, and to his co- counsel. They paint a very different picture of Carty than either her fawning daughter or her misguided appeal lawyer. Court-appointed attorney Guerinot was given some of the most odious clients in Texas or anywhere, including serial killers like James Paster, and as the man himself said:

"These were terrible cases. I did not defend them in the true sense of the word, rather I represented them to the fullest extent to ensure they each received a fair trial with every constitutional right to which the worst offender is entitled under our Constitution."

Guerinot's bad reputation stems from a defamation campaign against him by Reprieve, a so-called charity, one that has never allowed facts to stand in the way of a terrible story. Reprieve's lies have been parroted uncritically all over cyberspace, including by the "New York Times" Supreme Court correspondent.

Recently, Carty was back in court where she tried and failed to have her case retried, an attempt that was based entirely on tainted evidence. One of those who backtracked was Christopher Robinson, whose concern was entirely for his own case. In this documentary we see a very different Robinson, in particular a man who accepts his guilt even if he does rightly blame Carty for roping him in to commit a crime he would never have considered otherwise. When asked by Herzog how a street smart guy like himself managed to get suckered, he replied simply "Greed". Every man has his price; Robinson's was a cut of a 900lb stash of marijuana, one he realised too late did not exist.

In his interview, Goldberg puts up Charles Mathis who could have given "really good evidence to help Linda". Anyone who has read the appellate judgments will realise this is not so; Mathis was basically a character witness for a woman who had repeatedly shown herself to be untrustworthy if not actually dangerous.

Thankfully we also see although we do not hear from the victim's family; Joana Rodriguez was buried in her native Mexico; for the moment, Linda Carty is buried in the Texas penal system. As long as she remains buried, no one should really care if she dies by lethal injection next year or of old age three decades from now.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Conversation with Linda Carty
Michael_Elliott12 December 2013
On Death Row: Conversation with Linda Carty (2012)

*** (out of 4)

The second episode in Werner Herzog's group of interviews with people on death row isn't quite as good as the first episode and it's really far off from the film INTO THE ABYSS. This documentary takes a look at Linda Carty, a woman who is on death row but claims that she's innocent. Carty was convicted of murdering a woman so that she could steal her 2-day-old baby. Herzog makes his point very early that he isn't a fan of the death penalty but I must admit that he never gives us a reason to agree with him. The brutality and senselessness of the crime on display here is going to make most people say Carty should die so trying to defend her as being a human really doesn't work when one considers the crime she did. I think the weakness in this film compared to the first entry is the fact that there's really no good argument made on Carty's behalf. She claims she's innocent but then again so do countless other criminals and there's really no evidence shows that will make us believe her. There's also an interview with the man who helped commit the crime and Herzog also discusses the crime with the D.A.. While this doesn't live up to the director's best works, it's still entertaining just to hear the story and see what questions Herzog asks.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
what really happened
melissabee-6038726 June 2015
I haven't actually watched this (yet), as I just stumbled across it doing research about women on death row in Texas.

So - not a review of the film, but to Michael_Elliot and anyone who has read his review, which in part says: "trying to defend her as being a human really doesn't work when one considers the crime she did," I would submit the expose by Lise Olsen of the Houston Chronicle on Feb 13, 2015 - easily find-able online.

It's a disgrace, what passes for "justice" in this country, and this woman is innocent.

Werner Herzog chose a perfect subject in Linda Carty - her story is almost unbelievable, except that we read these stories about wrongful convictions and overzealous prosecutors almost daily, Texas being the most brutal when it comes to capital punishment.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed