Reviews

11 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
Ignore these bizarre bad reviews
3 September 2018
They really don't know what they're talking about.

Hilarious Hard-R screwball comedy, smart, wonderfully acted, tight script, with funny improv from a lot of talented actors with solid comedy cred.

It's a party blowout movie. Bachelor Party. Can't Hardly Wait. Superbad. Old School. It's like that. A great way to spend a couple of hours.
69 out of 104 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Red Kite (1965)
6/10
Good little film
11 April 2016
Not bad, if you have an imagination and can appreciate what the filmmaker is trying to convey!

A young father bored with life buys a red kite for his daughter. An encounter on the bus gets him thinking about the meaning of life...

Dated and unassuming, a fairly standard presentation, and features a young Michael Learned (or a lookalike) in an uncredited role. Course, nobody's credited here, there are no credits at all. I guess you take your Canadian government acting check and that's the credit you get.

Anyway, it's a short story in film form and not particularly deep, but makes a good point, in visuals vintage and pleasing to the eye.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Half of a good movie
16 September 2013
Warning: Spoilers
Half of a good movie. Started out really strong and fun and hilarious. Hitting the usual rom-com beats but with some extra rudeness in there, and Anna playing a funny and realistic person, even given the unusual conceit. Notable in that her friends were supportive and accepting, even when they found out the truth -- rather than turn them into shrikes and shrews, the gang of girls just made situational jokes and nobody got bent out of shape, and that was a nice touch.

It went wrong right around at the basketball game. We knew they were getting closer, but suddenly he takes her out of the apartment and suddenly he's got access to the Garden? Painful. And then after that, even more, they jump in the water? The hell? The rest of it just veered right into the weeds -- stuff set up was paid off very weakly with pure stock dialogue and hackneyed beats. With a few pratfalls thrown in to keep it from pure torture, but still it was pretty bad. We just stuck with it to see how it ended.

But we were laughing our asses off up until that basketball game. Surely the book didn't implode that bad...surely some producer stepped in and messed it up. Who knows. Anyway, a real shame. Your best bet -- watch it up to that point and then turn it off. It all works out the way you think it will, if you've seen ANY rom-coms in your life. :-)
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Rewards the patient, perceptive viewer
23 October 2011
A lot of people didn't really get this movie, and that's to be expected.

It all made perfect sense to me. "The Tree Of Life". From our nebular beginnings as atoms in the universe, through our very inception on this earth. And the birth of mercy, compassion, love -- when the dinosaur, instead of eating its vulnerable prey, allows it to die with dignity. The movie basically tracks the birth of compassion, or the way grace is born out of "nature red in tooth and claw". The way of nature -- selfish, egotistic, unloving...or the way of grace, which makes all life possible. It's laid out very clearly, and acted out by the family's story.

There are a lot of visuals that were hard to parse, of course. This is Malick we're talking about. Surely they have meaning to him, or maybe they don't. But there's so much poetry here, there's layers upon layers of meaning a sensitive and receptive viewer will pick up. It's all there. I can't imagine how any such viewer will fail to perceive the beauty that suffuses this film -- which is indeed the very theme of the movie.
0 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Just awful
4 March 2010
Warning: Spoilers
* Gratuitous, unexplained gross-outs. * Non-charismatic schlub of a protagonist who does nothing -- all the action comes to him. He suffers one indignity after another until finally he cracks. Then it all works out. * Not effective as a satire on science fiction, authors, workshops -- not to mention families, movies, or human beings. * Just not funny, except sometimes Jemaine.

I feel like the Hesses are now "trying" to be "quirky" "just like in Napoleon Dynamite" (as I'm sure they hear over and over again in pitch meetings). This has many similar features and beats, but none of the charm. They've lost it. They need to start writing new things and explore the big wide universe outside of their own minds.

Real disappointment.
11 out of 25 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
What is all the hubbub about?
28 February 2010
This movie is not a good movie. The script, by a totally inexperienced screenwriter, is a half-finished jumble of incoherent events, mixed with unfinished story lines, mixed with completely cliché plot points and dialogue.

Somehow the agitprop of bombs and etc., along with the jerky camera business (obscuring bad acting) has amazed people to the point of believing that there's some sort of meaning here, but there's really not. No meaning nor significance. It's not even a good exploration of meaninglessness!

It's an all around poor effort, and if it gets an Oscar, then the fix is in.
7 out of 15 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Quarterlife (2007–2008)
8/10
Unfairly Maligned
10 March 2008
This show got a lot of bad press, which seemed to be from people who either watched a few minutes of one segment, or didn't watch it at all but got their information from other reviewers.

I was ready to hate this show as being inauthentic and dull, but...well, a funny thing happened on the way to my bad review. I sort of forgot my preconceptions and got to know the characters. And I liked it.

There's quality writing here, and the show is nicely filmed and presented. It's a bit provincial, perhaps, and the angst of twentysomethings might be niche, but there's a lot here for everyone. And twists and turns and humor too. A fine way to spend your time...deserves a second season and a second look.
19 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Fountain (2006)
8/10
Beautiful and Sensible
19 May 2007
Warning: Spoilers
So some of you hate it. That's understandable...it's slow and it's obscure, and a bit ponderous.

But it is perfectly comprehensible, I assure you. There was no point in the film where I found myself more than a little bit lost. And the resonances between the three stories and the themes and refrains were quite plain to see.

Izzy has written a book: about a Queen (herself), being surrounded by an evil Inquisitor (cancer). She deputizes the Conquistador (Tommy) to find the key to eternal life. It doesn't make 100% sense for the Queen to do so...you'd figure she'd prefer to have the Conquistador spirit her out of the country. The fact that she *doesn't* should alert you to the fact that she can't leave, because she's Izzy and she's stuck in her body.

In the present, Tommy cannot let her go. He works like a dog to try and save her. He's traveling down a dark and narrow road. You see this echoed throughout all three story lines, which feature linear, sparsely lit environments (this was pointed out in the featurette) -- code for his difficult path and his monomania, code for his journey to the light.

Since he discovered this fountain of youth drug as a serendipitous accident while searching for the cure to Izzy's cancer, the future Baldie could be (with his ring tattoo) Tommy himself -- but it's better understood metaphorically, which is how Aronofsky presents it. The tree, the tree of life, the same magical tree which cured the monkey and which the Conquistador sought, is Izzy -- Tommy feeds himself off the tree, ensuring his continued eternal life, just as he fed off Izzy herself, which indicates he feared simply the extinction of his own heart when she died. That Izzy is the tree suggests he felt Izzy rendered him immortal, and we all, who have loved, have understood that feeling of immortality.

In the end, Tommy, in "First Father" mode, sacrifices his body for the creation of a new universe -- both in the dissolution into vegetable matter, and in the disintegration by the supernova -- which is seen as the final letting go of Izzy and of his pain.

Beyond this for me it gets a little fuzzy, for I only saw it a few days ago and still processing it. But as a writer of symbolic weirdness myself I know when something is comprehensible and when it's just weirdness for its own sake. This is the former, not the latter. And you can be angry and feel cheated because you didn't get it, but you can't say there's nothing to get. Aronofsky clearly worked to provide a well-realized and resonant narrative which is actually more integrated and finished than Pi and deeper and more authentically personal than Requiem.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Quite Enjoyable
6 January 2002
A little off, but not in a bad way. I think the filmmaker honestly wanted to offer up something deeper than your usual fare.

I watched it because it started with Dvorak's 9th Symphony, 2nd movement, which is a beautiful piece of music. Hypnotized, I sat and watched the whole thing. It didn't let me down. Nice visuals, good sense of humor. The girls were attractive, especially the Italian girl he meets in the diner toward the end.

When the credits rolled, I was glad I watched it. It had some interesting ideas in it, and makes you think. I commented because it made me sad that the only comment was a negative one. Doesn't deserve that. I appreciate what writer-director John Ryman tried to do and what he did do, and enjoyed the result. It was a pleasant way to pass 90 minutes, and I'll probably watch it again.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Good Movie
12 April 2001
Warning: Spoilers
SPOILERS BELOW

This movie had a subtle, tight, tricky little plot that Altman made look like a bunch of chaos. Both screenwriting and directing were above par -- I don't know how he got the performance out of Helen Hunt that he did. She was marvelously understated as the female stud to Dr. T.'s true blue naif.

When Robert Hays says "Certain Indian tribes say that if a woman's all wet, first time you see her...it's bad luck!" THIS IS IMPORTANT, because around this time, we're surrounded by wet women. Farrah's naked in the fountain. The girls are all caught in the rain. And Helen Hunt as well.

The thing is, Dr. T. loves his job, and especially delivering babies. He finds that the most wondrous part of it. This is why the end makes so much sense, despite its fantastical twist. He drives into the tornado -- Dallas society, his office, his life -- and comes out the other side, stripped down to basics, needed by the people to help with the delivery of a child. It was shocking to see it so graphically portrayed, but that was real. And Dr. T. needed to get back to the basics, back to what was real. (And thank god it's not another woman! he's relieved to find.)

Not a bad movie at all. One of the more likable Robert Altman films. God help the Philistines who dissed it as chaos, or for moral reasons, etc. -- you all are the reason why it's so fun and profitable to be a screenwriter: all you want is a simple, brainless good time, and MY how you squeal when you're asked to do a little thinkin.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Cherry 2000 (1987)
Urbanite hires crusty lady tracker to find sexy robot
17 January 1999
This is the kind of film that gets under your skin. One of a small subgenre of Sci-Fi Westerns, its small flashes of inspired writing make it worth watching some night when there's nothing else to do. Cameron Milzer is particularly notable as a blackly comedic psycho-girlfriend, but Tim Thomerson and Melanie Griffith are no slouches themselves. Pleasant bleak visuals and an interesting score from Basil Poledouris (Robocop, Hunt For Red October, & the Conan films, as well as 60 other movies) make for a modest repeat viewability factor. Fun and stupid!
26 out of 31 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed