Reviews

13 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Lawless (2012)
2/10
ugh - don't waste your time. Straight to cable caliber acting and direction
10 December 2013
Warning: Spoilers
The performances are terrible. Shia theBeef is the same guy he was in Transformers. If a still turned into a Decepticon I would not have been surprised, but probably would have been more entertained. Guy Pearce was OK as the creepy guy, but compared to his other work it seems like they took the 4th best take of every scene. Gary Oldman was pretty decent, the only one I forgot even for a second was acting. Jessica Chastain was not convincing at all.

The story was terrible, the ending utterly unbelievable. You can't shoot cops - even corrupt cops - and expect to stay out of the electric chair. They shot a *lot* of cops, who seemed to apologize for getting in the way of the bullets. That ain't how it works, folks, even if you are tired of writing the screenplay.
2 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Pretty dreadful - on the nose writing
2 June 2010
Warning: Spoilers
There are a lot of wannabe filmmakers and writers out there, and this would seem to be made by one of them. Wes Anderson has made some movies, some of which actually have characters and pacing, but is somehow reverted to wannabe status. He created a situation straight out of a loser's fantasy, the sort someone wallowing in self-pity over a breakup might come up with. The anguished, devastated hero (with nothing in him to attract anyone) gets to be morose and unforgiving and his (ex) girlfriend still comes more or less begging like no ex ever has or will. Sure, people get back together, or see each other, but the whole interaction was as false and fantasy driven as a GI Joe cartoon. The girlfriend was essentially a prop, not a character with recognizable motivation. Nobody behaves like the people in this movie. Writing like this comes when you don't know who your characters are, but you know what you want them to do. Ugh. And they all say exactly what they mean, totally on-the-nose writing, like nobody ever talks. No subtext, perfect self-knowledge, such character as is revealed is done through dialogue. "Show, don't tell"

Anderson should try making a silent movie.

And of course, nobody has any material worries. Watching "Hannah and Her Sisters" long ago, it struck me that nobody had any place they had to be, no bills to pay, every Manhattan apt. was a palace. This strikes that same false note without any real characters or desires, which HaHS did. I'm glad it was a short, and I'll skip Part II.
7 out of 16 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Gums (1976)
7/10
Amateur trash, but in a good way
28 February 2010
Warning: Spoilers
Look, there's not much point going to see this if you don't have an appetite for goofy, amateurish efforts. But if you do, this is really well done within its limitations. The actors deliver the silliness with conviction and surprising competence. It's got some very surprising moments of anarchic creativity that had my wife and I speculating whether they were done for the fun of it or in response to logistical challenges. The actual pornographic stuff is shielded, so it's not much more hard core than skinimax. The orally-fixated mermaid is played by Teri Hall, a very attractive woman who appeared in a number of major mainstream porn movies. It's also a pretty good spoof of "Jaws". It's kind of a fun way to waste a little time.
6 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Big Fan (2009)
9/10
Oswalt surprises in basically serious movie
24 September 2009
Oswalt plays a guy you might call a loser, but his character wouldn't agree. He's not as over-the-top into loserdom as DiNiro in "King of Comedy." He's not delusional, in other words, just passionate. His team means more than anything to him, and if they are doing OK, he is content. In his world, he has status, and he's just not interested in anything outside that world.

I was surprised to see real acting going on, not comedy. (I won't say "just" comedy - that's hard as hell and takes real talent.) Nothing milked for laughs, nothing that broke the boundaries of the world of the story. A reviewer said Oswalt was "fearless", and I agree. William Goldman wrote of stars that you can never make their parts cool enough for them. That's why so many movies are so terrible. Oswalt has never seemed that interested in being cool. Instead, he dives into his character, as sympathetic or unsympathetic as the moment requires. Not a shtick: character.

It is a low budget production, but I felt it was adequate. The production values didn't hurt. And it is funny, just not 3 jokes / page of script.
41 out of 52 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Ferestadeh (1983)
10/10
Wonderful, intriguing drama, suspense and character ftw!
14 July 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I saw this in an art house when it came out and it has stayed with me. Strong characterization, great, believable performances, neat twists and a healthy dose of truth. Ultimately, nobility is an individual thing. Bureaucracy and power are corrupting. I loved how human everybody was. It also gave a valuable look at what went into the Iranian Revolution, and shows what has gone sour there recently. I have no doubt that the majority of SAVAK employees deserve execution. Lots of the basiji that replaced them deserve it, too. Cue "Won't Get Fooled Again" by the Who...This is a gem, well worth seeing for its naturalistic, believable presentation.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Delivers what it promises
8 January 2000
These guys combine low-brow with low-budget. It's glorious.

Look- if you want Bergman, rent "7th Seal" or something. If you want to see gross-out humor and exploitation sex, this is the one.

I think Jane Jensen as Julia makes it all watchable. She can actually act (really well), she's a complete dreamboat, and she doesn't seem to feel above it all.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Some films don't need a plot - this is one
7 January 2000
"Thin Red Line" features much more musing and philosophizing than combat. I suppose that's the clearest warning I can give to anyone who needs a movie to be plot driven. This is more like a poem than a novel. There is no protagonist, unless you really stretch the term. There is no one antagonist- not even the Japanese. Some of the U.S. soldiers even feel a connection with their enemy, or else mourn the lack. But I think it's a good film even without a strong story line. This is a remarkable achievement for Malick. He pulls it off. In the right hands, a strong theme can replace a strong plot. Malick's not interested in Good Guy vs. Bad Guy. He's after the struggle to maintain a sense of hope in the worst conditions. You see this most strongly in Sean Penn's character, who is deeply conflicted.

I do have some problems with the movie. Generally, the bigger the star, the more damage they do to it. Travolta and Cloony are awful. Cloony in particular plays the same guy he always plays. He could deliver the same lines dressed in black rubber body suit. Travolta is just not believable. I thought Sean Penn gave a good performance, but something made it hard to believe. I just didn't see him as a 1st sergeant. Maybe it was as simple a thing as his hair style. I could have bought him as a lower rank, easily. Nick Nolte was believable.

The battle sequences are very strong, very effective at putting you in the middle of the scene. I ducked from tracer bullets once.
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
I've seen it twice- slow pace notwithstanding, it's worth it
5 December 1999
It's not just the nudity, though you may not believe me. I thought the long sequences of drawing were fascinating. That has to appeal to you for this movie to work. If you need frenetic visual stimulus, this is not for you. The performances are great- without calling attention to the fact that they are performances.

A central theme is that producing great art requires ruthlessness. It's rough on the participants. That's supported by the lives of most of the great artists- and the unfortunates who fell into their orbits.
2 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Girls in Prison (1994 TV Movie)
3/10
Neither fish nor...well, it is pretty foul
25 July 1999
This should be a campy, cheesy riot, an homage to exploitation films. Instead, it just is one. It seems they didn't feel like trying hard enough to make good schlock, and counted on the camp element to excuse the lack of quality on the serious level.

I thought that this would be like 'Mars Attacks' with shower scenes. There were two of those, and I have to say I enjoyed them. But as Joe Bob Briggs says, the plot gets in the way of the story.
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Das Boot (1981)
10/10
Absolutely terrific
5 April 1999
This is an amazing film. Not one of its 210 minutes is wasted.

The director's cut takes advantage of improvements in sound technology. I saw the rerelease in a great movie theater and the separate sound tracks pulled me deeper into the movie. You can hear water dripping all around you...

It's tense- mercilessly so. I applaud it's humanity, too. I think a lot of German soldiers were victims of Hitler.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Decent popcorn flick with trademark helicopter scenes
20 January 1999
It's a fairly painless way to spend a couple of hours, but there is none of the chilling horror of "The Conversation", which it pays homage to. It has a lot more action, but less really happens.

Every film that Tony Scott or Jerry Bruckheimer is involved with features lots of cliched, jump-cut shots of wildly tilted helicopters. I don't know what it is- maybe it's meant to acknowledge an audience that cares more about aircraft than people. This movie has lots of those shots, most of them completely irrelevant to the proceedings.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Bad, boring performances and script make a climbing movie dull
20 January 1999
I saw this at the Telluride Film Festival and was impressed by Herzog, but not in a positive way. He's a pompous ass. That doesn't necessarily detract from a movie, but I thought I'd mention it. This film has some absolutely stunning shots (especially of the incredible peak, Cerro Torre), but the human elements are a complete waste of time and film stock. There's actually not much climbing in it.

I liked "Fitzcaraldo" and "Aguire" quite well; check those out instead.
1 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Weird, wonderful. Fantastic imagery.
13 December 1998
This is an extremely off-beat film. I found it very rich and inventive. I think fans of "Brazil" would enjoy it. It's like an old fairy tale, the kind where kids actually did get eaten.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed