9 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
The animation is cool
22 October 2023
"Bedknobs and Broomsticks" is kind of all over the place. Without knowing the history, it seems like a low-rent cousin to "Mary Poppins;" upon reading a bit of its history, it seems that this was in production when it was not clear if "Mary Poppins" would ever get made.

The animated sequence was fun and the integration of animation and live-action is perhaps better than "Mary Poppins," and I recommend the movie on the basis of this alone.

The live-action sequences, however, are plodding. I've never been a fan of light-hearted depictions of Nazis.

The special effects hold up very well, especially considering the time in which this was made. It is interesting that this was released just 26 years after World War II.

Six stars. Recommended.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Perhaps worth watching for Disney completists
17 September 2023
As a white man, I am not in a position to say whether "Song of the South" is or is not racist, although Johnny's molther certainly is, I am sure that the black experience in the Reconstruction South was nowhere near the pleasant experience in this story, and the fact that star James Baskett could not attend the premiere in segregated Atlanta is telling.

What I can say is that while the animated sequences were fun, the live-action parts were boring.

This is worth watching for Disney Studios' completits, or for those who watch films like DW Giffith's "Birth of a Nation" for their historical context.

I watched a Japanese bootleg. All of the dialogue was in English, with the songs sub-titled. Maybe worth viewing for the historical context.
1 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Not even so-bad-it's-good
16 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
When you watch a horror remake of a beloved children's story, you hope for over-the-top lunacy, or at least so-bad-it's-good. This was neither.

I can buy the basic premise -- after Christopher Robin grows up and leaves 100 Acre Forest and his animal friends behind, they become feral. But then the story loses its internal coherance.

The story jumps ahead five years as first Christopher Robin and his fiance, and later a group of sorrority sistes, visit 100 Acre Forest. I will hide this behind a Spoiler warning, but it's not much of a spoiler in a horror/slasher movie to know that not all of them will come out of this alive.

Christopher Robin is immensely unlikable, standing by, not helpless to be sure, but simply watching PIglet choke the life out of his fiance while feebly protesting, "Why are you doing this?" Pooh and Piglet then drag Robins away for some torture.

The sorority sisters are visiting an vacation rental in 100 Acre Forest to help one of them recover from a sexual assault. Except for this one backstory and the only blonde of the bunch who is a social media influencer, the rest of the sistes are indistinguishable.

After the SA survivor tells her story, the influencer decides it is the right time to use the hot tub, late at night by herself. She snaps some selfies with a cell phone that is labeled "Natasha" (the character's name is Lara; the ACTRESS is Natasha) and looks through the photos, and sees Pooh peering around the corner of the house. Not thinking anything of it, she continues preening until she is abducted by Pooh and Piglet. They hog-tie her and leave her in the driveway until Pooh runs over her head with a car. Which creates several questions -- when did Pooh learn how to drive? Why kill her in such a gruesome fashion when they could have just ripper her head off and eaten her? Where did Pooh find overalls and a lumberjack shirt to fit his above-average frame?

Later, the remaining sisters find a battered but still alive Robins strung up in Pooh's hideaway and release him. This is the last we see of Robins until the climatic ending of the movie, another 40 minutes later.

The sisters find a battered woman tied between two beams in another room of Pooh's house, and before releasing her, make her tell them her story (which didn't explain who she is or how she ended up here). After the movie, I turned to they guy next to me, and neither of us could figure it out.

By this point, several people had already walked out of the theater.

The SA survivor had begun to carry a gun for protection, but apparently loaded only one bullet.

The third act begins when the remaining girls run out onto the dirt road and flag down a passing car with four locals, one of whom runs the dilapidated general store at the edge of the forest. "You've got to help us, please, there is something after us!" pant the girls. "Whoa, whoa, slow down, you're not making any sense," reply the locals, as if the monsters have been living in their forest for five years with no one the wiser.

Ultimately, the only thing that makes this a Winnie the Pooh movie and not a psycho furry movie, is that Pooh is often seen with honey dripping down his snout, which begs the question, where is he getting the honey from?

There are other flaws with the movie, but I will stop here.

The closing credits promise that "Winnie the Poo will return." As much as I enjoy really bad cheesy movies, I am not sure that I will.

I have to acknowlege that my experience may be biased due to the attorcious behavior of other patrons. One dude two rows ahead of me, wearing his Pooh outfit, was on his phone for much of the film. The couple next to me were not-quite-whispering through the whole movie. I don't know if streaming has created an environment where proper theater etiquette is a lost art, but this was as bad as a theater experience as I have had in a long time.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
The rise and fall and rise again of a cultural icon
12 February 2023
I more or less grew up at the same time as Pamela Anderson, and lived through her magazine covers, "Baywatch," "VIP" (which I actually kind of liked), her romances including the four-day whirlwind courtship with and subsequent marriage to Tommy Lee. Then came the stolen sex tape, after which Anderson more or less disappeard from public life.

I am very happy to see that a couple of decades later, she returns in this very good first-person documentary. She vulnerably opens up about how she was discovered, her time with Playboy, how the sex tape scandal emotionally affected her and ultimately destroyed her career. Even at the point of recording the documentary, recounting that time brings her to tears.

I did not hear, but at the time of filming the documentary, she was invited to play the role of Roxi in a production of "Chicago," apparantly to positive reviews. Here's hoping (if she wishes) that this leads to opportunities to return to acting.

Recommended.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Charles Band's lost first film
12 February 2023
I watched this on the Full Moon Features app, where Band kicks off the movie with a 10-minute explanation about how the film was "lost" (the first showing was so poorly received that he destroyed all of the prints) and until a negative print was "found" in the UCLA archives in 2010. This is the best part of the movie.

"Last Foxtrot in Burbank" is a satire of "Last Tango in Paris," with Machael Pataki mumbling his lines in the Brando roll, and Sherry Denton in the Maria Schneider roll. I have not yet seen (and am not really interested in seeing) "Last Tango" so I cannot comment on how closely "Last Foxtrot" follows the original, but there is not much to recommend about "Last Foxtrot," except for Charles Band completists.

Interesting -- Band numbers all of his films, but after destroying the original prints, he disavowed this one from his filmography, until it was found in 2010. He subsequently calls this Film 0.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
A tale of two stories
10 February 2023
Warning: Spoilers
The first half of the documentary was good (7 out of 10 stars), a retrospective of Marilyn Monroe's life and career. Good, but nothing new that is not covered in any one of the many other documentaries.

The second half of the documentary focuses on the circumstances of her death and the aftermath, as the director interviews several people close to Marilyn at the time. I was left wondering how he would have telephone interviews with these people, and yet have video recordings of their end of the conversation.

The director went to great pains to build a case against the Kennedy's for both her death and cover-up. Ultimately, he crashes his own theory, so, what was the point? 3 out of 10 for the second half for an average of 5.
1 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Blonde (2022)
5/10
Be prepared for a slog
10 February 2023
This movie is not a documentary, and is not even really a biopic. Still, to watch this, you are left thinking that Norma Jeane / Marilyn Monroe was a doormat, allowing one bad thing after another. Only once in this nearly three hour movie did Marilyn ever push back, but we don't know whether or not she was successful.

No doubt her life was troubled, and no doubt whe was exploited, taken advantage of, and abandoned by several people who claimed to "love" her. There is no question that her life ended tragically. This movie, though, made her seem as if she never had a happy day in her life.

On the positive, Ana de Aramis is fantastic as Marilyn Monroe. I recommend this movie if only to watch de Aramis.
0 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Well made documentary detailing the fall of a myth
10 February 2023
I watched most of Lance Armstrong's seven Tour de France "wins" as they happened. I had a yellow bracelet, I owned his two memoirs, and I bought into the myth. It wasn't until just before his seventh "win" that I began to wonder if the rumors and allegations were true. I brecame convinced he was riding dirty when he staged his ill-advised comeback to the Tour, finishing third (this after Floyd Landis was disqualifed). Since then, I've seen several news stories and documentaries and have read several articles. So when I recently watched this documentary, several years after it was made in 2014, I didn't learn much new.

Still, I found this documentary to be very well done with lots of first-person accounts to build the case against Armstrong.

My only complaint is that after spending so much time with Betsy Andreu and Greg LeMond, detailing how Armstrong bullied, threatened, and did everything he could to destroy their characters, and with is non-apology confession on "Oprah," I would have liked to have seen more of a follow-up with Andreu and LeMond. I suppose that is for the sequel.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Wow, this was something
10 February 2023
Wow, this was something. The kaiju dinosaur monsters are depicted in 3D clay stop-motion animation. After being imprissoned for (I didn't catch how long, but at least millenia), they awaken, vowing vengeance upon all humans. They turn all of the dogs on earth red, which somehow makes them evil, and the dogs start wreakaing havoc and destruction on humans and their cities.

It's up to four heros, depicted in 2D cell animation, to somehow stop the madness. Unfortunately, two of the heroes are bumbling klutzes. The other two are siblings? Married? I couldn't tell, but they unite in mind, body, and spirit to fight the evil monsters and restore sanity.

The rapid switch between the stop-motion and cell animation was jarring. Overall, the movie was quite bonkers.

Watched via "Rifftrax: Attack of the Super Monsters"
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed