Reviews

21 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
Stargate: Atlantis: Adrift (2007)
Season 4, Episode 1
6/10
Killing off protagonists will not save the storyline
26 December 2020
And yet another Atlantian is slowly leaving the cast, and (pun intended) is leaving a gap in the story-line not filled up by its successor. This is not a way of achieving longevity of a show. In at least two cases writers and producers were than forced by popular demand to make the characters return as clones, ghosts, robots, whatever. Just do not kill the primary and popular characters in the 1st place.
1 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stargate: Atlantis: Vengeance (2007)
Season 3, Episode 19
1/10
We wanted Light, they gave us Darkness
26 December 2020
Watching this nonsense was hard to endure. 45min of running in dark tunnels and looking at decomposing bodies for a dinner time. Well, thank you for this masterpiece. The entire recurring story-line with the 'Michael' was unbearable. Here an entire civilization was apparently killed off by a vengeful individual, and processed as lab-rats in some sort of bio experiments. Even worse, the victims and their stage of development are totally incongruent with their previous appearance.
4 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stargate: Atlantis: Sunday (2007)
Season 3, Episode 17
1/10
Killing off popular protagonists does not make sense.
26 December 2020
Warning: Spoilers
We can only guess what prompted the decision to kill off Dr. Beckett in all the sudden, what merely caused an outcry of the in fan community and did not contributed to the story line at all. Was it about the character or about the actor, we often have to ask ourselves than, knowing the many rumors about the harsh office live in the studios...
6 out of 22 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Stargate: Atlantis: Misbegotten (2006)
Season 3, Episode 2
2/10
Unnecessary plot, annoying story line.
26 December 2020
This entire recurring story-line with the Reyt called Michael is not plausible, and plain and simple a boring nonsense: Aliens morph in days from one form to another by the effects of ad hoc vaccine. Yawn... Atlantis with its stunning visuals could have become a long running cult series, challenging the Startrek series in every aspect. Instead we became that, and as expected, the series died off in season 5.
3 out of 14 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alias: Mea Culpa (2001)
Season 1, Episode 9
2/10
What happened to the bullets in Sydney's west?
17 June 2020
Sydney was just shot a few times into her bullet proof west and felt down some 50m, judging from the visuals. Now she craws out of the cave, seemingly ok, and her vest... show no bullets. Such a blatant blunder, of a goof as we call it. What a pity, and they were doing quite well with the story line so far.
1 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alias: Time Will Tell (2001)
Season 1, Episode 8
2/10
Please go back to High school, or Middle school and read some history books
17 June 2020
Really, a 15xx Rambaldi in ... Argentina? There was no such thing in this time, please stop it. How about placing the story line on Sardinia or Corsica. Unbelievable.
1 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Art of the Heist (2007– )
1/10
Horrible camera work and cut, impossible to watch. Nonsensical mix of heist and politics.
12 December 2018
I think that the image of Klimt on the cover was a warning enough what kind of production this is: So many things dropped into one basket and called a heist, and yet any events around museum heist or forgery do not compare to conquest and confiscation. Hold that thought.

Worse is the camera work: The makers of the series want to generate "tension" by hysterically shaking the camera, cutting short snippets of 0.2 seconds into a visual goulash of kinds. I saw my wife covering her face and telling "I am becoming dizzy, I cannot watch it." In addition to that comes the rather simplistic dialog. An example please: In episode one (heist on the Museum in Stockholm) the narrator "surprises" us with this stunning statement: The police had to discover how the heist was performed, and "where the pictures are." Of course camera shakes all the time, short snippets of parts of police cars, streets, museum floor and whatnot appear as a background. Ah... I would not have guessed, we have to find out where the pictures are. How stunning. No. Not really.

And now lets mention the mix of "heist", "forgery" and confiscation. And there of course in the best Hollywood manner the Nazis come to rescue. This is not right. The dramatic events of WWII were not "a heist," this was an orchestrated action sanctioned by law, which was inhumane and criminal. This is a totally different aspect, with enduring consequences. The actions of the Nazis were by its nature limited to maybe 10 years, whereas the robbery of art and valuables in the time of conquest and in the colonial times endured for centuries. The number of peaces stolen and shipped to museums in Europe is in millions. Governments of Egypt, Greece, Italy, Turkey and many others protest for decades and demand a return of pieces from most respectable museums on the planet. Even the Getty Foundation in the US was apparently in possession of numerous stolen pieces, and were defending the return claims in courts with all means. In some cases they had to return stolen art. So you see, this where the Nazi stolen art belongs to, its a different kind of a problem. Should Venice return artwork to Constantinople/Istanbul? Should Russia return several tens of thousands of artwork stolen by the "trophy brigades" of the red army and rotting in Moscow catacombs be returned, as the Germans demand for decades?

And to make the things even worse, this production makes a very one sided report of the story about Cornelius Gurlitt, a son of an art dealer living in Nazi times. Yet another abuse of the term "heist." Apparently Gurlitt's collection was scrutinized by Americans after the war and deemed legal. Why this blank assumption that all artwork was Jewish? Should the number of pieces in possession not be proportional to the ethnic proportions? I am sure it is. Thus by its nature maybe every 100th piece in his collection was if you so want of Jewish ownership.

If it comes to "heist" in Gurlitt's case I would rather apply the term to the German prosecutor: They had no right to take the pictures from his home, without a warrant, when investigating tax issues. This was a blatant violation of law, and caused a level of indignation in Germany. Thus Mr. Gurlitt's will bequeathing every piece to a Museum in Bern, Switzerland. As it comes to the pictures itself: These were in most cases pictures which he tried to trade, but nobody was interested in for decades. No every picture ever made has an artistic value, that is in the "eye of the beholder."

This is a very hypocritical production, with a very selective set of topics, atop of the cinematic weaknesses. Shame on you.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
The Last Ship: The Pillars of Hercules (2017)
Season 4, Episode 2
1/10
A total nonsense
18 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Nathan James can be mysteriously disabled after being hit a puny water mine. Computers down, weapons down, engines dead. Yea, right. This kind of 'action' is good only for Startrek type of Alien-Tech encounter. But later even a missile hit, with a huge explosion leaves merely a "6 inch hole" and no apparent adverse effects. Yea right, again.

Meanwhile Capt. Chandler, now living in Greece anonymously, decides to join a villain who terrorizes local fishermen, and steals their catch. However, it shows quickly that the bad guy is in fact a James-Bond like villain, with a beautiful woman in tow of course, who likes to arrange naked fist fights. Naturally, Chandler proves to be a super-boxer and fighter, who beats opponents into submission. And he gets the girl for personal nights of passion, which he suffers only to enter the secret office in a flamboyant villa overlooking a blue Aegeyan Sea.

God have mercy, we waited so long for this season to get ...this?
5 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Could have been the next Bond movie!
17 April 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Great entertainment: Since our protagonist did not die in the first Mechanic movie (as opposed to the original 1972 classic with Charles Bronson), we are open to sequels. Good so. This could be the next Bond movie: Our Mechanic operates in spectacular environment, great vistas all along. He has seemingly unlimited financial reserves, and a plethora of gadgets. The villains are also formidable, equally well equipped, and like in a good Bond movie: They die a spectacular death, Mechanic gets the girl.

Stunts are great, so are the fight scenes. Opening resembles almost the Moonraker! This is hands down the best action thriller of recent time. Please continue! And explain it to the new Bond crew how to make a good action entertainment, they lost their ways.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
JAG: Lifeline (2001)
Season 6, Episode 22
1/10
How to vote on a worse engagement party ever?
7 February 2017
Let me call the two characters "she" and "he", we all know who is meant by that.

She gets engaged to an Ozi. Admiral throws a party, a special cake with US and Australian flags is served, so great... But: she avoids the groom to be... He leaves his girlfriend alone, sad and confused yet again. "She" and "He" spend almost the entire hour in private conversation outside the house, and fantasize about the possibility of their own relationship.

Where is the fun in watching it, please? Maybe Broombe should have rather get engaged to Renee, and everybody would be more happy, including the viewers. We might have watched another crime mystery, or a legal case, and resulting court proceeding. Instead we got awkwardness lasting for 45minutes. Thanks, but I can do without it.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Tales of the Gold Monkey (1982–1983)
1/10
Every bit as bad as I remember, no wonder canceled quickly
14 August 2010
Warning: Spoilers
It shows that even a producer of a caliber of one Donald Bellisario can make an awful production, literally insulting intelligence of this viewer. And probably the majority of viewers saw it similarly, when I consider that Studios pulled the plug after one season.

This show was made amid of the successful Magnum P.I. Don Bellisario later made the landmark series JAG and the current excellent NCIS. I feel happy that he came to senses, recovered and let his talent and ingenuity flourish.

Much of the Magnum cast appears in Monkey's pilot: Jeff McKay, one of our favorite characters from Magnum (Lt. MacReynolds, later returned to Magnum as a "con man extraordinaire Jim Bonnik." Marta DuBois (Magnum's wife Michelle) appears as a Japanese princess of kinds. John Hillerman, main character in Magnum "Jonathan Q. Higgins" appears here also as a vicious gestapo agent "Fritz the Monocle," who as expected will find his untimely death. Alongside appear a series of Asian actors, whom we also saw on more than one occasion in Magnum episodes.

Let me briefly summarize the pilot, a good representative of what type of a show this was: Two Germans, of course portrait in a stereotype way of vicious and cowardly, stupider than a regular adult person ever could be, stand at a waterfall and see a huge ape on the other side. Huge Gorilla of sorts, like in a Planet of the Apes, expect for a childish (party?) costume. We know later that the Germans are 'scientists.' For some reason one of the Germans opens fire at the (noble) ape. The ape is not easy to kill, it attacks! It takes a lot of yelling and shooting until the ape finally dies. Other apes appear and make a short process of the Germans. Hurray.

In another scene Princess Koji (Marta DuBuis) sits naked in a Japanese Onzen Bath, and a Japanese samurai tries to grab a red cord tied to a neck of a cobra as a test of courage. A German agent visits the princess. The German is extremely cowardly, scared to death of the cobra, sweats and shakes, what amuses everybody. I was not amused, neither was my wife, who said at some time "I am finished with the show," and did not wanted to watch it any longer. Later in the episode we see the German agent pretending to be a local reverend, seducing a local, pretty and yet stereotypically stupid native girl Tiki. So what it is about? Legend wants, on the volcanic Island with the Apes exists a statue, a gold one of course, and that alloy is so resilient to heat that Germans are after it. Fritz the Monocle, who won dog's Jake glass eye in a poker game, worth $100,000 as they said on the table, is dressed as a German navy officer and is on the mission to find the Island of the Apes and get the statue. The rest of the details are kind of irrelevant, get the DVD if you must see. Suffice to say, bad guys die, good guys win, French womanize, but are good otherwise, Germans are bad. Japanese are also bad, but in a knightly "samurai" kind of way, whereas Germans are ridiculous and cowardly. Visual effects are embarrassing, especially the volcanic eruption on the Island of the Apes looked like an apprentice job.

Poor Jeff MacKey! For this role of a mechanic Corky his character on Magnum has died in season 3! Corky as a character fades into another stereotype: simple minded, always dirty, unshaven, looking for a bottle and yet a good trusty fellow. Jeff was lucky to return to Magnum in season 5 as Jim Bonnik, and his extraordinary talent showed fully in this role.

Monkey seemed to have been filmed in Tahiti and on Oahu, we clearly recognized Bora Bora, called here Gora Bora. Standing joke in the show is that dog Jake makes "woof" for yes, and "woof woof" for no, or is it the other way around? This seem to lead to a never ending series of confusion.
8 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Star Trek (2009)
1/10
Why to even write one more review? This is so awful...
1 January 2010
When I peruse the existing reviews, some of which are so excellently worded and analytic, I could actually just say "ditto". What is the probability that someone would even read yet another review, another 1-star? Apparently the indignation caused by the watching of this drivel provoked in me the need for this senseless act. Allow me to create one more outcry of protest. Let us put it on a pile of others.

So dear Film-Studios, here is some trivia about Star Trek, you do not care about, with observations you will not read or regard: Star Trek was a saga of space exploration, of scientific and social mystery with moral dilemma. The characters involved were highly educated specialists with civilized behavior. Their way of life and their world of technical advancement has authentically influenced our contemporary technical development. The flat screens, laptops, smart phones. We saw it all before... in the Star Trek.

Your storyline is driven by simplistic behavior of people who would pick a bar fight, smash someones face, or rather massacre it bloody. By any standards, such violation of conduct implies a long, very long prison sentence and possibly a psychiatric observation. Need an example? Think of this lady astronaut, who driven by jealousy traveled boldly across the country with bad intent! This act alone, without really hurting anyone was enough to get her expelled and fear a prison sentence. Your embarrassing movie is a remake of a Wild West western, crossed with Star Wars for that matter, but has nothing, literally nothing to do with the Star Trek and its spirit. We saw this dilemma already in the last full time movie "Nemesis" and in the so boldly failed and canceled series "Enterprise" with Scott Bakula. The screenwriters idea is somehow reduced to a demonic or psychotic "nemesis" of mankind and Federation, its a Wreck Trek with computer generated images.

It proves that studio delegates are not a replacement for visionary geniuses. Please do watch Star Trek Next Generation, DS9 or Voyager, listen to William Shatner's analysis of your failures, try to understand. Than: even DS9 and Voyager turned slowly into a wrong direction of a cosmic soap opera spanning Las Vegas and Luau, probably a real life horizons of the involved screenwriters. But even than the series never lost its intellectual and humane face. And please, no Mr. Abrams involved any longer in the franchise! Let him make Fast and Furious VII, or Before Star Wars III, maybe even Species VI. Keep him out, please. This franchise needs a filmmaker with intellectual traits, in the style of Contact, Abyss or Space Odyssey.

One more mystery intrigues me here: How this fury of bad reviews come together with the average rating of whopping 8.4, as it is today on Jan. 1 2010? I will let your own imagination play the detective in this case. Go boldly with your analysis, where one has gone before... Into a sweaty boxing studio...
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hustle: The Hustlers News of the Day (2006)
Season 3, Episode 5
10/10
The Royal Trick...
27 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The 'mark' in this episode of Hustle is a ruthless, truth bending, cynical and despicable editor in chief of one of the British tabloids.

One of most enduring secrets in contemporary Europe is how a proud nation, such as the British, can have such a morally despicable tabloid press? How this social phenomenon is possible, considering the in England typical high moral claims about themselves? Remember the "be British" self proclaimed slogan? Do not count on it in Britain's press. Not only "gentlemen" is a term introduced worldwide, so is "hooligan," "rowdy" or... "grifter," for that matter.

Under such circumstances sympathies of the viewers are clearly with our con-man team. They came out with an elaborate story involving royal family, which they hope to get published in the tabloid. Of course, they also know how to later discredit the story, and make some money in the process. The tabloids are so hated in Britain, that even the MI5 helps in the execution of the con's most difficult trick, which appears to provide the irrefutable, hard proof to the editor of the tabloid. In the end it takes however Mickey Bricks "plan B" to get some money for the trick, which is being than in a best Robin Hood fashion donated to a charity.

This is one of the best Hustle episodes. The storyline is suspenseful. It is fascinating is to watch the replays of the crucial scenes with the "dots filled in." As always, a first time viewer will be stunned how the same scenes can tell a different story and explain what has really happened.

This is how we like Hustle: High stakes, sophisticated and so stunningly plausible in the detail.
0 out of 0 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hustle: Law and Corruption (2006)
Season 3, Episode 6
3/10
Another "trick the police" scheme, not the best writing...
27 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
As the series progressed, it became apparent that the writers could not provide yet another "con" of the same quality for each episode... The pressure to produce ultimately takes its toll on even best of the breed writers and producers.

This episode is an example of this syndrome. Our intrepid team is performing one of the famous "long cons" on a shadowy character from Australia. They escape with the money as usual, but following the con the team is arrested on a faked narcotics charges. Apparently a famed star police detective was watching them and was able to perform his own "con": Somehow he had an identical case available, filled it with kilograms of heroine and switched it miraculously at an unknown point of time. Our team is forced to help him to apprehend a slippery 'super brain' thieve.

So far so good, but there begins the part of the story in which the entire plot reduces itself to simplistic or not plausible events. While being held in prison hostage, Albert becomes an easy access to the evidence storage, can exchange many kilograms of bags with white powder, can open a police safe and remove money from it. The team lands nights... using parachutes on a lit lawn of a high security estate, with guards and dogs walking along the fence perimeter. Of course, the dogs do not hear or smell anything of the entire commotion... Really? Meanwhile Stacey appears at the gate to make a "my card broke" type of diversion, and the guard is stupid enough to leave the gate open for Ash to sneak in and to work his voodoo on finding out passwords for the alarm system. When the guard will back off, Stacey hits him into unconsciousness with a single blow of her Panzer Hand.

I think this says it all, its absurd all along. The finish is equally weak. This is not the "Hustle" as we know it otherwise. But considering the number of most stunning episodes, we shall forgive them for making one even so weak conceived!
4 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hustle: Missions (2005)
Season 2, Episode 4
6/10
This could have been a stunning con!
18 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This time our team is under a difficult test: A tipped off corrupt police officer identifies and arrests Danny and Mikey. They quickly understood that she wants them to perform the next con, but the proceeds should go to her. The mark is a collector of historic comic book drawings. In a typical Hustle manner, Mikey's team turns the table on the police officer, and the way how they did it is indeed quite elaborate and so twisted that viewer cannot really guess what will happen. Suspense at its best, I grant that.

However, in two cases the plot will be helped by very simple conceived events, and here the storyline disappoints. In one case they obtain a key to a storage locker in a bank by bumping into her and letting her drop the key. Would you be really losing such a key so easy? In another case, as she gets the 100 thousand pounds check, she is made to keep it in an external large pocket of her purse and walk so down the street with this pocket on the outside! This is quite naive. Everybody would have put such valuable check in an internal safe pocket, with zipper for example.

Obviously, the writer could not find a better, so to speak less naive way of accomplishing these two for the con vital elements in the puzzle. In fact, the team needed not the locker key, but merely the number of the locker. Maybe a mike placed in her purse would do the trick? They could have listened to her asking for the key. And later on, I expected rather a "hustle quality" purse switch, and not a "bump into her" trick with a 100 thousand pounds check sticking out for the world to be picked...

Its a pity, because other than that, the fine nuances of the con were very well conceived. She was indeed a sitting duck. She believed to be in control and she never saw what hit her. Her conduct was so bad, that viewer feels well when she gets a taste of her own medicine and will be arrested herself.
6 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hustle: Eye of the Beholder (2005)
Season 2, Episode 6
9/10
Surprizing to the end!
18 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
The idea of stealing something so prominent and so unique would be rather good for an "Entrapment" or "Mission Impossible" style of a movie. Why is it here, so outside the usual profile of the team and its typical objective of a con on a shadowy character? Because in fact the theft as such is not the objective, and this becomes obvious only at the very end of the plot.

A few elements in the plot appear almost naive, such as cracking of the security measures. As if that would be so easy... Aside of this, the convoluted storyline buries deeply the real objective of the con, and the purpose of the seemingly unrelated events and series of preparatory distractions. The most funny on the plot is that Her Majesty Police is in fact providing the "proof of authenticity" for the chunks of glass which will be "sold" several times to several shadowy collectors. I have not seen that coming!
2 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Hustle: Price for Fame (2006)
Season 3, Episode 1
6/10
Comparatively "simple" plot, with a few problems with credibility
18 December 2008
Warning: Spoilers
This first episode of the 3rd season shows our intrepid team in a bad financial shape caused by Danny's blunder. Apparently this ordeal pushed them to a hasty selection of a dangerous mark. The entire idea of the con is rather simple, the "plan B" is however quite delicious. The (quite detestable) mark loses all, and yet does not know that it has been tricked. Our team did it again, this time with some cuts and bruises.

With one exception: The way in which the team obtains police vehicles and uniforms is questionable at best. This was simply not very believable, and on such deficiencies the plot fails its quality test. The better of the Hustle episodes are stunning by their level of complexity, surprising twist, and because they appear so believable. One cannot help to wonder if something like that could not happen in real life. I doubt that a team of outsiders can simply "borrow" 2-3 genuine police vehicles this way, this is not real.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Alexander (2004)
1/10
Is Hollywood ruled by talentless protégés these days?
21 September 2008
I do not even know where to begin... Such is my deep disappointment with this movie. I suppose that every history buff shares this emotion, and not surprisingly the movie tanked at the box office.

The dialog is very simplistic, barely touching the level of complexity of the unfolding events. For example could you understand why he decided to execute Parmenion? Virtually none of the characters was really introduced, and so numerous of the palace and gathering scenes appear out of sequence, and it is not obvious what and whom they depict. Imagine you would open a 2000-page book randomly here and there, read from it, and try to make sense of such random fragments. This is how I felt while torturing myself through this malaise.

Aside of the unnerving style of jumps back and forth in the time line, the entire Persian campaign of Alexander was compressed to mere one battle with Darius. Not "Darayas," pronounce after me: Dar'yoos. Of course depiction of a battle itself is not an easy cinematic task, and here the makers of the movie showed their real deficits. They failed completely to explain what exactly happened at Gaugamela, and foremost, how it came to Gaugamela. Shaking cam substituted staged scenes with honest stunts, split second snippets were cut together into a visual blur without sense. Bombastic, too loud music, yelling with British/English accent completed this cinematic disaster.

The storyline misses completely the fact that Gaugamela was not the beginning of the struggle with Darius III. It was the climactic battle indeed, yet just one in a row of great battles with the Persians. The first meaningful battle was the one of the Granicus River, 334BC, in which he defeated Persian general Arsames, and so called Darius III himself to the scene.

Many famous events happened in between Granicus and Gaugamela. For example, at Gordium, Alexander untied the presumably unsolvable "Gordian Knot," he defeated Darius in the Battle of Issus in 333 BC, and later on, he commenced the famous siege of Tyre. This event marked the end of Phoenician independence and of over 1000 years of their culture and history as a nation. Do not look for even mentioning of any of these events in this so called "movie about Alexander." Do not look for the equally dramatic aftermath of Gaugamela either, foremost for his march on Persepolis and the (in)famous burning of Xerxes palaces and of the city. Do not hope to see his stay in Egypt and spiritual pilgrimage to the desert, the creation of the still existing city of Alexandria and of the Ptolemaic dynasty, which lasted to the equally famous Roman civic war and the death of Cleopatra and Marcus Antonius...

Shall I go on? Movie makers made of him a gay maniac, yelling and screaming, troubled man. In a sense he was troubled, a man of military genius, but lacking a political vision. A man who won everything, did not realized that and pushed his army to an epic, and yet senseless march toward India, caused a great deal of suffering and destruction. I never understood why do we call him The Great? As much as such opinion may vary, do not expect an answer from this movie. As I see it, Macedonians were only a footprint in history. Not long after Alexanders exploits, they were beaten every each time by Romans, and forced finally into becoming a Roman province. End of the game.

Hitchcock, please raise from the grave, show these young Hollywood crowds how to make a good suspense. They all lost their minds and their senses.
5 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Casino Royale (2006)
2/10
This is not the Bond I knew all my life long...
3 September 2008
It is bad, really bad. We lost the elegant flavor... The new, so called Bond is not "the classic Bond" anymore. Dialog is unsophisticated, situations are mundane and accompanied by a display of excessive mindless violence and brutality. The story line recalls places and situations which we saw so many times in previous Bond installments, but without ever managing to restore their magic and uniqueness. The former elegant, eloquent, flamboyant, and yet completely unreal spy and super agent is now an ordinary martial art thug with plain language. What a transformation.

Going to a Bond movie was like returning to a special dinner. We would like to find everything in its right place. Identical ...but different. And of course we expect to find all ingredients present and of impeccable quality. The villains are expected to be highly educated, eloquent and flamboyant as well. Our villain here in Casino Royale invested money from an Ugandan warlord in puts, and needed to blow up an aircraft to make his investment win big. Really? And once it failed, a poker game was the "big plan" to get it all back. Yes, a poker game. This was it, this is the entire plot, the level of "sophistication" of a devious plan. Do you think that this is worth a Bond movie? I want my Spectre back. I want to see the game for the domination of the world, with unreal but physically plausible equipment, which none of the gullible governments has. And I want Bond saving us all, as always, but of course differently each time.

Shame on you, Casino. Sean Connery and Roger Moore are still the quintessential Bonds for me. With films starring Timothy Dalton, the entire enterprise began to spiral down, and sadly it has never recovered.
4 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Please don't do such Star Trek movies...
25 August 2008
Warning: Spoilers
Apparently the departure of Gene Roddenberry as the principal of the franchise unveils yet again the simple truth that visionaries cannot be replaced by studio's delegates. Rick Berman, or whoever else is responsible for the selection of the screenplay, does not stack up to the task.

Why are these Star Trek movies so dark now? The recurring motive seem to be yet again "a total annihilation" of planet Earth. What ever happened to exploration, first contact, mystery? This pedestrian motive is only excelled by serious faults in logic and simplistic dialogs. A cocktail of these ingredients provide the screen book of Nemesis:

There is this poor tormented human being, somehow bread by Romulans with Picard's DNA (yes, its real!) with a mission to infiltrate these pesky Humans, but than abandoned by Romulans and incarcerated in nasty mines. He liberates himself together with a race of warriors, who suddenly seem to have from somewhere resources of an Empire to build a mighty fleet, innovative weapons unheard of, and to defeat Romulans. And for a reason defying any logic, he develops also hatred to... Humans and to Federation, whom he plan to obliterate with a help of these very Romulans, who used to torment him and his companions! The absurdity of the plot is made even more ridiculous by using borrowed function denotations from Roman Empire, and there an evil "Praetor Shinzon" is born. Less funny than Dr. Evil, but much more absurd. To brighten up the movie, and to compensate for lack of any sophisticated storyline, screenplay incorporates "arcade game" type of shoot-and-run scenes, which would be better placed in Star Wars VII or XII "The Empire is yet more Evil." Suffice to say, bad guys shoot thousands of rounds, but they shoot bad. Sounds familiar?

I am so disappointed. I saw recently William Shatner's TV commentary on the downfall of the entire Star Trek franchise. His critique included the equally bad TV series with Scott Bakula, not only the screen plays. He was so right in his criticism. Studios must find a new leading team for the franchise. This appears to be the only way for Star Trek to rejuvenate itself.
0 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Magnum, P.I.: Never Again... Never Again (1981)
Season 1, Episode 7
1/10
USA is not Uruguay
30 July 2007
Warning: Spoilers
Here is the scoop: Israeli secret service hunts ex-Nazis. So far so good. But once they found a suspect, why don't they go to FBI and INS? Why this secret hunt, kidnapping, assault with syringes and finally, ahem, a vigilante murder? What if they would be wrong with their suspect? And to what end did they kidnapped the person anyway? USA extradites such people. Really! They would have helped and wrapped up the entire case. So what possible reason could be in this entire kidnapping scheme?

But wait, there is more! Let's just look at the entire character depiction. Rick and Thomas are both hugging and kissing the elderly pair, who was not even mentioned in any prior episode to explain such level of tender love and admiration, and to whom they basically merely deliver their dirty stuff for cleaning. Would you hug and love your laundry man? Is this really plausible?

It is most astonishing about this miserable episode and this pitifully written script, that so many people do not even realize just how many absurdities have been piled up atop of each other in this one. I think it's being called "suspension of disbelieve." Extraordinary, as Higgins could have said.

For me this episode clearly stands out as the "yellow lemon", not belonging, a blunder. It appeared to me that in the 80ties, in the climate created in Hollywood virtually every show just had to have at least one "nazi hunt" episode, and so Magnum was also "blessed" by one. Case made, now we can return to paradise and our favorite Private Investigator.
7 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

Recently Viewed