Sollazzevoli storie di mogli gaudenti e mariti penitenti - Decameron nº 69 (1972) Poster

User Reviews

Review this title
3 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Fun decamerotici
BandSAboutMovies14 December 2021
Warning: Spoilers
Facetious tales of pleasure-loving wives and penitent husbands - Decameron number 69 AKA More Sexy Canterbury Tales AKA More Filthy Canterbury Tales* is most assuredly a Joe D'Amato movie. At the time, he didn't want to lose work as a cinematographer, so he used the name Romano Gastaldi, which mixed up assistant director Romano Scandariato name a bit. In the English version, he's listed as Ralph Zucker. However, D'Amato used his real name, Aristide Massaccesi, for the cinematographer credit. He also shows up briefly as one of the monks who this film revolves around.

Obviously, this is a decamerotici film, a series of movies that had their main popularity between 1971 and 1975. Much like every trend in Italian exploitation, it all started with the success of Pier Paolo Pasolini's Trilogy of Life, which were The Decameron, Canterbury Tales and Arabian Nights. Beyond the box office success of those three films, the Italian censors were beginning to relax their grip and allow more nudity, so more than fifty of these films were made in four years. D'Amato also made another film in this subgenre, Novelle licenziose di vergini ogliose, which features Giovanni Boccaccio, another of the direct inspirations for these stories.

In between the three stories in this film, the framing device has some young monks attempting to get with some nuns while the Father Superior who tries to stop them ends up taken in by a very needy older nun.

In "Le due cognate," an older husband leaves his young wife for a business trip and this leads to her going heels to Jesus with a young sculptor, who also ends up sleeping with her husband's sister. The second story is not as kind or nice, as in "Fra' Giovanni," a young priest falls in love with a woman during her confession at which point she seduces him and makes him pay for their sexual encounters. When she's sick of him, she tells her husband, who puts the priest's penis in a chest lid and squeezes it until the holy man must castrate himself. This will not be the last D'Amato story that ends with a man removing his own sex. And then, in "Lavinia e Lucia," a young man sneaks into a rich man's home and into his wife's bed which is all good with the older man, who believes that the offspring of a hermaphrodite is always male.

At the end of all this, the monks walk back, exhausted by their sexual adventures and also because the Father Superior told them it was unfair that he never got to sleep with a young nun, so they all tried to satisfy the older nun.

Eventually, this subgenre would become the much more popular commedia sexy all'italiana genre, which was popular until 1981. But by that point, D'Amato - while he made a few, like Vow of Chastity and Il Ginecologo Della Mutua - had moved on to making horror and erotic films that combined the tropics with gross out moments.

*In Germany, it was known as Hemmungslos der Lust verfallen or Falling Unrestrainedly into Lust.
0 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
One of those fearless decamerotic films
andreygrachev3 January 2009
Well, we saw about 100 of Aristide Massachessi films and love his works,especially from 70-80s. This movie was one of early examples of director's humor. It is about some monks, who were enjoying the forbidden pleasure of sexual adventures. We should say that the music and pictures come together very-well. The characters and situations are really funny. There is no gore and porn here- just crazy and revolutionary freedom. To all Joe D'amato's fans this one is hardly recommended. And by the way, this film is well-directed as well. The acting is surprising.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Early (surprising classy) effort from Joe D'Amato
lazarillo4 April 2012
This is an Italian "decamerotici", an erotic-nudie film based on Bocaccio's famous literary work "The Decameron" (although no doubt more by way of the hit Piero Paolo Passolini film of the same name). Unlike some of the other "decamerotic" films, this lacks any "name" actors like Edwige Fenech, Rosalba Neri, Erica Blanc, Barbara Bouchet, Femi Benussi, Krista Nell, Camille Keaton or Ornella Muti. But it does have a "name" director, or co-director, in Joe D'Amato (aka Aristide Macassessi) who was making the transition here from cinematographer to director.

The dispensable frame story has a bunch of horny medieval priests cavorting with a bunch of promiscuous nuns, but this mild blasphemy only serves as the jumping off point for the three main tales (most of these films actually contain five or six tales, but the ones here are unusually drawn out) with the common theme of marital infidelity. In the first tale a married woman (Marzia Damon) is cheating on her husband, but after she is caught by her sister-in-law, she ends up having to share her lover. The second tale is about a libidinous priest who pursues another married woman who he takes confession from. But after he is caught naked in her room by her husband, he is forced to make a very difficult choice involving a heavy, locked chest and carving knife (think of a coyote having to chew its leg off to escape a trap). Although played strictly for laughs, this story anticipates some of the violent sexual nastiness of D'Amato's subsequent directorial career. The third tale though is back to pure comedy with a man who disguises himself as a maid to get close to HIS married object of affection. He too is found out by the husband, but this husband being considerably more dimwitted decides that this "maid" is a freak of nature and attempts to help her out. . .

These are not very strong films as far as the sex goes, but there is a lot of female (and some male) nudity. Their strengths lie in the bawdy stories (some are taken right out of the Bocaccio book, but I'm not sure about any of these ones) and the period comedy. They're certainly a lot more CLASSY than the majority of sex films. For better or worse, this is probably a classier film than anything than the notorious Joe D'Amato directed afterward. It won't appeal to everyone, but I liked it.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed