The Undead (1957) Poster

(1957)

User Reviews

Review this title
79 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
6/10
Witches' Brew
EdgarST21 May 2019
Very entertaining concoction: in spite of its shaky sets, dresses with zippers and carriages definitely not from the 6th century (if the script is alluding to King Mark of Cornwall), verbose dialogs and a few corny performances, this Roger Corman production has the tone and feeling of a fairy tale, as performed by kids from elementary school with naiveté and spontaneity. The time-travelling premise in the script by Charles Griffith and Mark Hanna is clever and it could have benefited from a bigger budget for revisions, re-writes and higher production values. As it is, I find it funny, charming and even daring, as it somehow aspires to have values similar to literary works written in old times, about death, transcendence and the role of science in the evolution of mankind. It is also another proof of Corman's ability to turn almost anything into a pleasant time for the viewers. Recommended.
26 out of 28 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Medieval drama unfolds and Satan is the critic
bkoganbing14 September 2014
I saw The Undead many years ago and sad to say before writing this review I got to see it again as part of Mystery Science Theater. No doubt Roger Corman did a whole lot of Thanksgiving specials especially in his early career. But I always rather liked this paradoxical film about hypnotism and travel. And of course a scientist's curiosity which backfires on him in a most peculiar way.

Pamela Duncan is the subject of hypnosis therapy by doctors Maurice Manson and Val Dufour. She's a hooker, but when we first meet her she's under and regresses back to a life in the first millenia AD where she's been condemned to be a witch and scheduled to die. Her mind goes back to that past and she escapes the headman's ax.

Which creates a paradox because if her past life doesn't die it puts her future lives in jeopardy. Knight Richard Garland who's earnest, but a little thick loves the past Duncan and wants to do the knight errant thing and save her. Real witch Allison Hayes has a thing for Garland and doesn't stand a chance while she lives.

Fascinated by the paradox and the drama Dufour regresses himself through hypnosis to see how it all unfolds and meets none other than a medieval Satan himself played by Richard Devon. He also is watching the drama unfold in fact he recognizes Dufour for who he is and states plainly that he is the critic and let the play continue.

No doubt Roger Corman was influenced by all the publicity of the Bridey Murphy controversy and the book and film that was made about it. Of course this is shot on a dental floss budget and it shows in spots, but only rarely.

I waited for years to see this again and review it and despite the MST snide comments during the film I still enjoyed it though Citizen Kane it ain't.
11 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Coffins, hexes, and pitchforks, oh MY!!!
InzyWimzy19 August 2004
I fondly remember Corman's excuse to put a bevy of blonde babes on screen and pretend they were female vikings in Viking Women and the Sea Serpent. Heck, I even enjoyed "I'm a PRINCE!!!", but at times, the stagnation has you thinking, "Oh, yeah, I was watching a movie!" as your trail of thought wanders off. I even recall the yawning plague from the horror he penned in the Gunslinger which was only saved by fiery red maned Beverly Garland.

The Undead (although not pertaining to zombies or ghouls, but the unholy one) has a certain je ne sais quoi...a campy, strange feel. Sure, it was shot on some studio set and it looks like the entire village consists of less than 10 people. However, the effort put into this actually makes it a trip to watch. I don't know what the whole prostitute angle is or the question of whether or not a streetwalker is valued higher than a damsel accused of heresy, but it is a first! The eccentric, yet most recalled character, Smolkin, steals any scene he's in so much so that the "Hey diddle, diddle, the cat in the fiddle..." tune was stuck in my mind that even the homeless guys asking for change gave me odd glances when I was singing that walking near Fulton St. Witch Livia, played by bombshell Allison Hayes (she can hex me anytime!), plays the sultry, seducing spellcaster to a point! No wonder Pendragon couldn't resist (poor dope). Cast a plus for Meg, the gnarled crone who really makes you wonder if she collects toadstools and brimstone in her spare time. Nice chin too! Add in creature transformations, the impishly diabolical Billy Barty laughing from the underworld and this is one strange mamma jamma. Also, they actually took time to write scenes in ye olde English which just throws you for seven loops. This also may require several viewings to figure out what exactly is going on. Oh, last but not least, don't forget cameo by Bruno VeSota who "heads" our cast to his quaint inn.

What's really over the top? Our fey prince of darkness laughs with such levity that cannot be Shatnerized. You have your typical scrupulous doctor who can't even pronounce correctly. It's NEPAL, not nip-pal! I really liked the bureaucractic feel of the Witch's Sabbath too. So be sure to "STAY" and see one of Corman's more entertaining yarns. Also, watch this one MSTified and you'll appreciate it even more. Although I may be mad, but I cannot say....
27 out of 35 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
I like the grave digger
joelius25 August 2000
Yeah, that's right, I like the grave digger AND his incessant singing. Everyone calls him mad, MAD, I say!--but his little ballads are always right on point. He is very reminiscent of the Fool in King Lear--the observer whose supposed simple-mindedness allows him alone to comment insightfully on the madness of the others.

Also, I like movies that teach me things. Like that women in the fifties somehow had both 14" waists and, well, GIGANTIC BREASTS! Weird science, man. It's a wonder that woman didn't snap in two when she stood up.
29 out of 32 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
This is one weird movie!
planktonrules24 June 2009
Warning: Spoilers
I liked how when the film began, it had a little prologue where the Devil himself talks to the audience. In most films, this would be a negative, but for a Roger Corman horror film, this sort of thing worked well--after all, these sort of films should never be taken too seriously. And, later in the film, this same silly spirit remained--with witches appearing and disappearing, changing form into animals and doing all kinds of incantations! And, an adorable pointed-eared Billy Barty was also on hand as an imp!! You really can't take this film very seriously--and I liked that.

The film begins at the present day. Two psychic researchers are trying a strange experiment using a prostitute ( no, not THAT sort of experiment--you sicko). They use hypnosis to take her to past lives to prove that reincarnation is possible. By the way, this is actually the plot of an Ed Wood (BRIDE AND THE BEAST) that was made just a year earlier--though the lady was not a prostitute AND it turned out in a past life she was a gorilla!!). Unlike the Wood film, most of the film is spent in the past--seeing her past life acted out for the audience. And, late in the film, one of the researchers himself goes to the past to rescue her when she is in peril! When they use regression, it seems that the prostitute was a French woman who was accused of witchcraft centuries ago. It turned out that real witches framed her in order to get her out of the way. A female witch wanted the lady's boyfriend and framing her of consorting with the forces of darkness was a convenient way to get rid of her. And, because the psychic researchers somehow interfered with time, they must go back and correct any changes their study has made--and battle the Devil himself along the way! Explaining the plot any further would probably confuse you--it is pretty weird and incomprehensible.

The film's strengths are it unusual plot, very odd ending and self-deprecating humor. Minuses are the cheesy special effects (at times), such as the bats with very obvious wires supporting them as well as the confusing explanations as to how time will be affected by the woman's life or death. Overall, it's a cheesy movie that actually works pretty well and is very watchable--much more so than most of Corman's films of this era.
8 out of 9 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Roger Corman Was Feeling Ambitious
boblipton6 January 2021
Pamela Duncan plays a street walker who is called in to an institute being run by some men who have just returned from Tibet. They all take a trip to the Middle Ages, when the devil, played like a raffish Mephistopheles, is a general in the battle between the forces of good and evil for the soul of an earlier incarnation of Miss Duncan.

It's a fairly ambitious little horror movie from Roger Corman, with an interesting scene in which the Devil raises three witches from their burial to offer some modern dance, gratis of choreographer Chris Miller. I never found it quite involving, because it's all shot on confined stages with AIP's usual budget in this period. Nonetheless, there are bits and pieces that seem quite stylish, like everyone had been to a screening of THE DEVIL AND DANIEL WEBSTER, and was feeling inspired, particularly Richard Devon as Satan. Billy Barty also has a role as an Imp.
7 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Fairly inventive
drystyx28 September 2012
This is a horror movie which seems to be unpretentious, and yet has some inventive quality about it.

It's hard to say who the central character is, because while there are two main characters, many of them share the spotlight. A woman is hypnotized into reliving her past.

To say more will "spoil" the film, I think, because there are many subplots going on here, along with the two chief plots.

While it definitely goes for "unpretentious camp", particularly with the imp and the beautiful evil witch, there is more than meets the eye in the story. Devon purposely hams it up as the Devil, because we've seen Devon do some great acting work in movies like "The Comancheros", and here he just has a blast. In fact, the movie looks like a "Monster Mash" type of blast for the supporting cast.

A few things ruined what could have been great. While a certain character was asking for a come uppance, the fact that she was an unarmed woman killed by the leading man was too much for any heterosexual male to enjoy. Women will like it, though, and most movies by Corman and his breed are made for women.

Mixed feelings, but not a bad flick. It helps when everyone seems to be having a good time. It makes the film more of a joy to watch.
6 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
The Undead
ryan-100756 March 2021
Former student Quintus Ratcliff (Val Dufour) wants to show off to old prof Ulbrecht Olinger (Maurice Manson) what he has learned in Tibet. He wants to get into the mind of his subject; a prostitute Diana Love (Pamela Duncan). She is sent back to a previous life in the Dark Ages. Unfortunately they think she's a witch. She escapes the clutches of those who want her dead to try and survive.

While this has all the potential to be horribly silly to me it works. The unexpected setting and unexpected look at reincarnation make this a passable movie. Also has a really nice twist at the end. Directed by Roger Corman. Written by Charles B. Griffith and Mark Hanna. Also starring Billy Barty and Dick Miller.
4 out of 4 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Worthy of an MST3K Episode!
Xophianic7 August 1999
This movie was awful, although I have seen some worse movies before. The Imp is the most annoying character even though he is supposed to be the most lovable. The witch is fairly attractive and the rest of the characters are really annoying. For example, the madman whom continuously points out that he's mad. And the knight in shining armor whom fights like a sissy and trusts everyone right away. But like I said, there have been worse movies.
12 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
THE UNDEAD (Roger Corman, 1957) **1/2
Bunuel197617 February 2007
I had long wanted to purchase the Region 2 DVD (it's still M.I.A. in the U.S.) of this one, but somehow I kept postponing it – I remember there was some discussion whether the Fullscreen presentation here was the correct Aspect Ratio – and it eventually went out-of-print. Luckily, I stumbled upon a single copy at the Oxford Street branch of Virgin Megastores while in London last month and quickly lapped it up. Distressingly, as has been happening with some of the stuff I brought over from the U.K., the picture froze as soon as the film started on my Pioneer model – so I switched it onto the cheaper DivX player I acquired some months back and it proceeded to play all the way through without a glitch!

Anyway, to get back to the film: I have to admit that I was somewhat underwhelmed by it on this initial viewing – even if I readily concede that it's one of Corman's most ambitious and interesting efforts from this era (with a plot clearly inspired by the true case history dealt with in THE SEARCH FOR BRIDEY MURPHY [1956]); the only other three of Corman's early horror titles that I've watched are A BUCKET OF BLOOD (1959), THE WASP WOMAN (1959) and THE LITTLE SHOP OF HORRORS (1960). I know that, with the budgets usually allowed Corman at this time, not much could be expected with respect to the film's look – but its partial period setting, perhaps, hampers it more than most; in later years, the black-and-white TOWER OF London (1962) suffers a comparable fate vis-à-vis the more visually lavish Poe adaptations.

The inadequate leads notwithstanding, the cast responds enthusiastically to the inherent campiness of the piece with Allison Hayes (as a wicked yet voluptuous sorceress), Mel Welles (as a Shakespearean gravedigger) and Richard Devon (as an equally theatrical Satan) coming off best – though the usually reliable Billy Barty makes for a rather obnoxious imp. Still, while the climactic Witches' Sabbath (with its clever twist ending and a brief appearance by the ubiquitous Dick Miller) is an undeniable highlight, the blank verse and 'Olde English' pronunciation utilized throughout the re-enactment of the heroine's past life gets tiresome pretty quickly; that said, this ill-advised attempt at respectability (the barren sets and general lack of period sense would have fooled no one even back then!) – for the record, the film suffered the ignominy of being spoofed on "Mystery Science Theater 3000" – does look forward to the somewhat similar yet rather more successful INCUBUS (1965) which was filmed, for no discernible reason, in Esperanto!

Among the DVD supplements are 9 theatrical trailers of titles in the "Arkoff Film Library" – though, curiously, not one for THE UNDEAD itself: I'd be interested to watch DAY THE WORLD ENDED (1955), THE SHE-CREATURE (1956), BLOOD OF Dracula (1957), EARTH VS. THE SPIDER (1958; promoted here under its original title of THE SPIDER), HOW TO MAKE A MONSTER (1958) and WAR OF THE COLOSSAL BEAST (1958) – all of which promise to be cheesy fun…not that I'd rush out and go purchase them or anything at this stage, mind you! With a backlog of some 600 legitimate DVDs and almost as many recorded VHS titles, God knows I have enough stuff to tide me over for a long time to come; however, one film I wouldn't mind getting my hands on is Corman's influential sci-fi classic NOT OF THIS EARTH (1957) – itself remade no less than three times! – but which has, mysteriously, never been available on home video.

A 50-minute audio interview (recorded at London's National Film Theatre) with legendary AIP honcho Samuel Z. Arkoff is also featured on the disc: it's an interesting piece – especially when discussing his early years in the business, the advent of Roger Corman himself and the company's tenure in England; less enthusing, however, are his decidedly feeble comments about the huge dividends made by low-budget productions today (in the face of so many costly box-office failures) – but where their ultimate quality, entertainment value and longevity could hardly be compared to the good old days.
9 out of 12 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
4/10
Not Dead, Just Reincarnated
hrkepler4 June 2018
'The Undead' is weird and sometimes confusing horror thriller that mixes reincarnation with time travel. Prostitute Diana Love (Pamela Duncan) is put into hypnotic trance by psychic Quintus Ratcliff (Val Dufor) and sent back into her previous life as Helen who is about to beheaded as witch in the dark ages at the night of Witch Sabbath. The premise is exciting enough and the ridiculous dialogue is well acted like usually in Corman's movies. The sets built out of plywood and Styrofoam are seemingly fake. Even the winged creatures that real witch Livia (Allisson Hayes) and her evil Imp are changing themselves are reused from Corman's earlier film 'It Conquered the World'. That is how cheep he made his movies.

While watching Roger Corman's movies, I occasionally think about the ideas used in his movies and what if he didn't need to rush his productions, but could allow to develop the screenplays and had a bigger budgets to use? Of course they might not be such an outrageous pieces of entertainment anymore as one immediately understands that all his inventiveness was direct result of small budgets. Oh well, one can dream sometimes.

'The Undead' is undeservedly overlooked and even forgotten horror film that again is rather interesting compared to other such productions from that era.

Again, I have to admit the world(cinema) would be much poorer without Roger Corman and his company of writers/actors.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Pure Allison Hayes
aesgaard416 December 2000
I'm a big Allison Hayes fan and have caught her in most of her horror films such as "The Zombies of Moru Tau" and the MST3K Classic "The Unearthly," but this movie comes a lot closer to trully capturing her presence than her really big hit, "Attack of the Fifty Foot Woman." She was mostly missing from that movie despite being the star and she wasn't given very many 'attack' scenes. In the "Undead," she plays a sexy witch called Livia [sometimes sounds like Lydia] who pines for the heart of a knight, but is waylaid by a time-traveling call-girl in the body of a past life. The Bridey Murphy/ Reincarnation thing was a big topic back then, but then it could have been a much different movie if the hooker had landed in Allison Hayes. This mostly condemmed movie was filmed in a studio that had been a closed-down supermarket which attones for the claustrophobic sense of the sets. Largely ridiculed by critics and true horror fans [not including the guys who prefer the slice-and-dice/body counts/heavy gore movies], this movie redeems itself in the end with a strange twist that really grabs the watcher, but even then, not that many people seem to respect that kind of ending.
39 out of 44 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Movie about the Hazards of Hypnosis & Reincarnation.
thejcowboy229 June 2017
Warning: Spoilers
Before I dissect this 1950's Horror classic. I want to take a moment in tribute to one of Hollywood's most underrated producer/Director Roger Corman. Corman who is labeled as the most frugal movie producer in Hollywood history with hundreds of films to his credit spanning six decades of work was also the mentor to heavy weights in the film industry as well. Corman influenced many successful actors at the start of their careers , Jack Nicholson, Robert DiNero,Sylvester Stallone,Dianne Ladd and Talia Shire. Many current successful film directors were mentored by Roger as well, Ron Howard, Jonathan Demme, Francis Ford Coppola to name a few. Out of the many films Roger produced including Little Shop Of Horrors which set a record for the quickest profitable movie ever made shot only in two days time. Only six films were monetary failures. For Roger's work in the Movie industry, he was finally presented with an Academy Award in 2009 for his lifetime achievement in films. You might say Roger planted many seeds in Hollywood that sprouted many successful directors, actors, writers and countless behind the scenes people. On to the film THE UNDEAD shot in dreary and foggy black and white. A scientist/psychic Quintus Ratcliff (Val Dufour)merely by happenstance comes a cross a prostitute Diana Love (Pamela Duncan) on a street corner. Takes her back to his laboratory where they are met by his colleague Prof. Olinger (Maurice Mason). I know what your thinking but there's no need to keep your thoughts in the gutter. This is strictly scientific in nature. In this small sized room with an centered examination table plus what looks like an E.E.G. machine (electroencephalogram) with wires attached as they take their shapely brunette on a journey like no other, back in time, Her past lives. Diana stops during the dark ages somewhere in England. Witches and the Devil himself are part of this dark foggy landscape. The colorful characters in this movie made this a curious tale to witness. Diana Love is now Helene who's personality is totally different than the defensive confident lady of the night. Helene is sweet and endearing totally the opposite personality. Troubled Helene is accused of being a witch and must proclaim her innocence and her love and leading man Pendragon (Richard Garland) will try to stop her beheading. Pendragon has a sexy rival Livia a real Witch (Allison Hayes) with her impish puny dwarf sidekick also with powers (Billy Barty) causing havoc for poor Diana. Other notable performances by the Undertaker Smolkin (Mel Wells) who sings catchy songs throughout and to prevent further trouble there's the unappealing Meg Maud (Dorothy Neumann). Every character is engaging in this twisted tale of past and present events. Through Diana Love's mouth on the table, the two scientist hear her story from humble and accused Helene. Ratcliff wants to travel back in time and prevent Helene to be spared as Professor Olinger sets up the machine for another traveler. All I can tell you is there's a price to be paid at the end of this story to make things as they are. Well written and one of Corman's best for that period.
2 out of 2 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Silly but fun movie. Roger Corman does it again. Professionally made. Decent watch.
Bababooe21 August 2017
Warning: Spoilers
The story is silly. We must all agree to that. But the acting, cinematography, music, editing are all professional. This makes this movie very watchable. Some decent effects. The dialogue along with the story is silly.

This is a 1957 B/W production. When viewed in light of the period made, the low budget, high professional production, and silly story, it makes for a fun movie. No gore to be seen. But some decent twists. Helens choice at the end was commendable. And Quintes getting stuck in the past is also a good twist, he can't get back to the present because the live link of Helens death.

Rating is a C, or 5 stars. Roger Corman does it again.
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Witty
bob_in_uppsala18 January 2019
A clever, sly and witty film disguised as a B movie. I assume its low rating is due to the fact that its rarely seen
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Conscience: "It's me -- you -- both of us!"
evening122 May 2021
Warning: Spoilers
I'm a practical person, the last to think about a former life.

But this diverting Roger Corman production got me pondering that. I was born in 1956. Had I entered the world a mere generation earlier, I'd have been a target of the Holocaust. Pretty chilling to consider...

This movie is shlocky, for sure, but it does get one wondering and features some wonderful dialogue.

"What brings you to the depths of the forest?" -- "Sorrow."

"You couldn't fool a child in its cradle."

"Be off, ghoul, and leave me alone!"

I also liked the casting here. How cool that true-blue lover Pendragon is portrayed by an earlier incarnation of David Strathairn. And how 'bout that sexy actress playing Livia, Allison Hayes? With her looks and body, I'd have thought she'd skyrocket in Hollywood. Her Wikipedia profile tells a much sadder tale.

The witches' Sabbath scene is certainly intriguing -- great dance! -- and the bare-chested executioner's leering crowd is appalling to behold. No surprise, really -- not then, or in today's world.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Corman didn't have much space to work with.
Aaron137519 February 2003
Yes of all the things to notice about the flick the one that stood out for me is the fact the set had to be really small. When ever the characters went anywhere in the movie it seemed they only had to go a couple of steps to get there. Enough of that though I have a movie to review. This movie is a about two researchers and their attempt to send a prostitute back into one of her former lives. They suceed and she ends up as this gal who is imprisoned in the Tower of Death which strangely enough seems to have only one floor. She is accused of being a witch and must die. She escapes with the help from her future self and this messes everything up so that maybe her future self won't live. It gets even more jumbled by the end with one of the researchers going back to that time to...he really doesn't need to, but I guess he just wanted to check it out. Billy Barty appears in this one as an imp and you will meet the most annoying grave digger ever. Also, watch for the good looking evil witch who can change into muliple things. Not much to recommend here, unless you watch the MST 3000 version of this flick. One thing I did learn is that you can't take your clothes with you to the past, but you can take your watch apparently.
7 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Horrid Concept
ataricat11 February 2001
This film has one of the most odd concepts I've ever seen. At one point, Quintus,(the hero)is so distraught over the loss of Helen, (the witch) that he tries to rent his soul to Satan. This proposition was so stultifying, it left me speechless. It also seemed to stump the devil as well.
6 out of 17 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Cheesy, but not bad.
Gafke23 January 2005
A smug researcher of psychic phenomena picks a prostitute up off the street and, through hypnosis, causes her to go back in time and re-live her previous incarnations. Turns out the young lady was falsely accused of witchcraft back in a foggy medieval forest of Long Ago and beheaded. However, her present consciousness and the doctors interference cause her to escape her prison and alter her future. If she does not die at the headsmans ax, she will never be reincarnated. Her hypnotist then decides to go back into time with her, and convince her former self to remain, and avoid being reincarnated as a hooker. But there are others who would convince her otherwise, including an evil but beautiful witch, her lover Pendragon, an old hag and Satan Himself. Only she can decide, and she has to make a choice before the sun rises.

This is actually a pretty good story. It suffers some from a low budget, cheap sets and some slightly muddy plot points, but it's entertaining. Alison Hayes as the curvaceously gorgeous, but evil witch is a high point, along with Billy Barty who plays her familiar wicked imp. It's better than most of the B-movie fare that was being mass produced at the same time. Cute and engaging, slightly morbid but mostly harmless.
5 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
3/10
Your brain will be spinning too fast after watching this to declare you dead.
mark.waltz20 June 2018
Warning: Spoilers
I can just imagine the director on this Roger Corman campy but obscure horror film with Satanic overtones, going to actors Allison Hayes, Val Dufour, Pamela Duncan, Billy Barty and Richard Garland, and insisting that they over-emote and sneer and snarl and do everything including chew the scenery. It's an absolute hoot, a fun bad movie, one they might have thrown popcorn at in the movie theater after paying their quarter or $.50 to get a ticket. It's the type of film that reminds me of the scene in "Ed Wood" where the Paramount executive believes that somebody played a practical joke on him after Wood dropped off reels of "Glen or Glenda". Seemingly told through the eyes of Satan himself (Richard Devon, complete with pitchfork and G.C. Murphy's 1950's style Halloween costume), this takes Duncan (given the soapy character name of Diana Love in the current day sequences) back to the middle ages where she finds herself escaping from prison while waiting to be beheaded for being believed to be a witch.

Through some back story thanks to hag witch Dorothy Neumann (looking like a witch thrown off of Living Island by Witchi-Poo and "Head Witch"), the viewer learns these witch's stories, a convoluted account of curses being passed down from their witch mothers, several of whom became beautiful (Duncan and Hayes) and Neumann condemned to look like Margaret Hamilton's hag in "Comin' Round the Mountain". There's an evil British night (Garland), a feisty midget (Barty) and a rivalry between Duncan and Hayes for Neumann which will lead them straight to the gallows. The modern story has Duncan being hypnotized by Val DuFour and the warnings that evil from the past might just come to the present because of the sinister revelations yet to come. It's made so cheaply that I expected the castles and fake trees of the woods to sway out of vibrations on the set. But there's something endearing about something made so badly that it's impossible to take seriously, even if the beheading scene towards the end makes you grimace. My question though: how many heads can one basket hold? Nobody seemed to be removing them (or the rest of the body) after the grand executioner swung his blade down on the panicking person's neck.
3 out of 8 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Seen on Pittsburgh's Chiller Theater in 1964
kevinolzak3 April 2019
Roger Corman's "The Undead" was an early release from AIP theatrically double billed with "Voodoo Woman," marking the genre debut of screen siren Allison Hayes, following on with "Zombies of Mora Tau," "The Disembodied," "The Unearthly," "Attack of the 50 Foot Woman," "The Hypnotic Eye," and "The Crawling Hand." The trenchant saga of Bridey Murphy served as inspiration for a number of then current films, including "The She-Creature," W. Lee Wilder's "Fright," and Ed Wood's "The Bride and the Beast," but Corman typically delivers the most unusual and captivating take on the subject (shooting title "The Trance of Diana Love," shot in six days inside a converted supermarket disguised by dry ice). American housewife Virginia Tighe had undergone a hypnotic trance that went further back than childhood, supposedly revealing her to be the living incarnation of a 19th century Irishwoman named Bridey Murphy. A book on the events was published in 1956 then a feature film starring Teresa Wright, after which the facts slowly revealed themselves as submerged memories from childhood that had nothing to do with reincarnation (one of Virginia's Chicago neighbors was an Irish immigrant named Bridie Murphey Corkell). This Charles B. Griffith collaboration with Mark Hanna featured the stars of the later production "Attack of the Crab Monsters," Pamela Duncan, Richard Garland, and Mel Welles, plus Dick Miller's cameo as a leper who signs a pact with Richard Devon's smiling Satan to cleanse himself. Pamela gets top billing as a modern streetwalker who agrees to hypnotic regression back to a period during the Middle Ages, where in her previous life she was an accused witch feted to die by the headsman's ax at dawn. The scientist conducting the experiment discovers that her journey is physical as well as mental, and that if she survives her past ordeal all of her subsequent lives shall be forfeited. As highbrow as it seems it's an absolute delight to watch a prime Corman ensemble in top form, adding Allison Hayes as sexy witch Livia and Billy Barty as her incorrigible imp familiar (the same flying bat creatures used by the Venusian in "It Conquered the World" are trotted out whenever the two change form), plus Dorothy Neumann as a sympathetic conjurer, Bruno Ve Sota as the innkeeper, and scene stealing Mel Welles as the gravedigger. Allison's witch may be evil but she's also hopelessly in love, and proves a more fascinating character than the central figure. Ronald Stein's music cues were recycled by director Larry Buchanan for his 8 Azalea pictures, all but one color remakes of black and white AIP titles from the 50s, though this title was fortunately spared.
4 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
Even Ed Wood Jr. would have been embarrassed by this...
trouserpress12 July 2004
Now don't get me wrong, I love Roger Corman movies, but this one is surely at the bottom of the heap. I read in his autobiography that this started off as an exploitation film about hypnotic regression to cash in on the success of a book on the subject. However it became some sort of a wierd hybrid horror film instead. Just what exactly was going on here? Why were there only five trees in the whole village? Why did the hypnotist Quintus take his watch back in time but not his clothes? Why did Meg Maude have the worst witch makeup ever to make it to the big screen? What is the point of having an imp that can change into animals (including a bat on wires) but still can't get through a closed door? Why does the Devil look like Robin Hood? Who in this film is undead? They all seem pretty alive to me.

This film raises a whole lot more questions than it answers. Luckily Corman himself always had a sense of humour, and probably realised that this film wasn't going to win him any major awards. However, it will always have a place in the hearts of us low budget, Z-grade, Samuel Z. Arkoff-produced movie fans. Luckily for us, and Corman, he went on to improve his directing ability a great deal and brought us better movies like The House of Usher and Little Shop of Horrors.
4 out of 13 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
8/10
Underrated Gem - I Enjoyed The Film
Rainey-Dawn22 January 2016
This is my style of 1950s horror. It's has the elements for a fun horror: time travel, hypnotism, witches, a devil, medieval setting, and magic. The film also has great direction, cinematography, casting and story with an awesome atmosphere.

It's hard to believe this film has such a low rating; its' severely underrated - in my opinion. This is a B film... a low budget film. The critics should never watch a low budget film if they are going to complain about it being on a low budget - that seems to be a big complaint about this film - not enough money. Sure if they had more money to make this film then it would have been even better that it already is.

Another complaint about this film is it's mistakes. Every single film out there has mistakes in it - including multi-million dollar films. Read the "goofs" section - every film will have them.

This is a fun fantasy-horror that is easy to kick back and enjoy. Ignore the critics and judge the film for yourself. This film is entertaining in it's own way.

8.5/10
34 out of 38 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Stupid but fun
preppy-319 December 2021
A prostitute (Pamela Duncan) is hypnotized and sent back to the Middle Ages where in a previous life she was unjustly convicted of being a witch. She escapes from prison and the real witch (Allison Hayes) sets out to capture her again.

This is one STRANGE movie! It has cardboard sets, lousy special effects, bad makeup and pathetic acting (the guy playing the Devil is beyond bad)...but I like it! Despite the material Duncan and Hayes are great, it moves quickly (it's only about 70 minutes) and I had fun watching it. Also watch for a fight between two guys where it's painfully obvious that none of the punches they're throwing are making contact! Also how can you hate a film with the wonderful Dick Miller doing a cameo? Silly but enjoyable.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Remember not to leave the one set, people. We couldn't afford two.
Oosterhartbabe28 October 2005
Warning: Spoilers
Curses on you, Corman! Any fan of MST3K has had to watch far too many of your dreadful snooze-fests. Boring, gray, horrible messes of films, with you trying to get intellectual(and generally failing). The only thing that stands out in most of your schlock is that the women tend to be intelligent and/or kick-ass. Gotta give ya that, if nothing else.

In the Undead, an idiot paranormal researcher hypnotizes a a hooker and sends her back into her own past life, as a young woman accused of being a witch in the Middle Ages. Actually, it looked like the hooker just attended a Ren Fest instead, and one with only about seven other people attending it. The scenes in the 'past' play out like Shakespeare on acid, and the cut scenes back to the 'present' are like trying to read Dostoyevski all in one sitting.

The hooker manages to help her 'past self' escape from the cardboard..err.stone tower that she's being held prisoner in. Outside on the one set, she encounters a gravedigger who makes Hamlet's look like a sane guy in comparison. She also encounters all six of the other Ren folk, including an old hag who's REALLY a witch; a beautiful young witch in service of the devil who can change her form and is out to steal the accused witch's boyfriend; an imp played with great joie de vivre by Billy Barty; said boyfriend, the dreary and uninteresting knight(what these two saw in him I don't know); and, of course, Satan. Satan in this one looks like he just escaped from a Broadway musical, so camp is he.

It turns out that the idiot researcher has managed to screw up the hooker's life even more than it was, since if the might-be witch lives instead of being executed, she'll not re-incarnate and none of her future lives will take place. Good job, dummy. Anyhoo, he finds a way to go into his own past, or her's, I wasn't really sure on that point. If it was his, it's pretty convenient that they both lived in the same time and place, no? he has to convince the girl to go tamely to her execution, which after spending some time with her boyfriend she decides would be a good thing. She goes under the headsman's axe, the boyfriend killed the shape changing witch(he's gotta be gay), and there's another puzzling cut scene of the pansyish Satan mouthing off about Hell(or something). End of another great Corman film, and the end of yet another few of my brain cells.
5 out of 18 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed