Touch (TV Series 2012–2013) Poster

(2012–2013)

User Reviews

Review this title
136 Reviews
Sort by:
Filter by Rating:
8/10
A Solid Journey
AMichaelL28 January 2012
I hate emotional manipulation, and I often see Jack Bauer when I look at Kiefer, no matter his role, so I was skeptical heading into the pilot. I was pleasantly surprised to find a pretty smart show that was hinting at a lot of possibility, without much pretense. Wait, is this really on FOX?! The vibe of this show is all positive, and you can nitpick the logistics and science that they use all you want, most of it is very sound anyways, but you cannot deny the appeal of the show.

The pilot had solid writing, good acting, a unique premise, and was just believable enough to make most people keep watching.

It has a chance to be a very unique platform to break down barriers other shows constantly build up (stereotypes, plot conventions, clichés, etc.)...but time will tell.

Note: I found the second episode even better than the first, and much more realistic in terms of the connections.
88 out of 134 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great premise but scattered.
jenscarbie5 February 2012
I love Keifer. He's one of my favorite actors ever. That kid is phenomenal too. This show could be great but it's as if it's written by a person with a short span of attention on a caffeine buzz. Too jumpy. I wondered why. Then I saw who wrote it and I knew the reason I felt such frustration and affection for the fast forward button. The same guy who reeled me in with such a great cast and story--Heroes--only to dash my hopes and kill my dreams with his lack of plotting ability,was back. Yes, I'm talking about Mr Kring, with his quasi-pseudo M. Knight Shamalamawatchamcallits(I don't care how it's spelled)twists and turns. Those are fine. But, then he loses his focus and chases random plot bunnies into dead end episode arcs that I could care less about at the expense of his good characters. I'll wait before I get hooked on this. Won't get fooled again. Plot bunnies look cute but they are evil!
55 out of 86 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
promising pilot, 2nd episode rather stupid
janosch123 March 2012
being in Germany i stumble upon new series by chance. i watched the pilot and thought "wow, this could really become my new favorite drama series", the plot was unusual, the acting of the kid was great and kiefer nicely interpreted the role of a scared, overwhelmed and caring dad without being cheesy. yes - the social workers choice of words and idea of help for the kid is rather odd, but it altogether promised to be a good series. the atmosphere was mysterious enough, the dialogues, colors, pictures, plotting and scenes were well done. then finally the second episode aired. and I'm very disappointed. kiefers dialogues are stupid (he sounds way too much like ctu), the storytelling isn't nearly as good as it was in the pilot (way too easy to guess whats happening) and the social workers skills are with her looks and not with the kid. the pilot had 8,5 stars, the new episode more around 5. i hope it will get back to the intriguing start!
31 out of 49 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Why a Bad Review
gibby-is-me20 February 2012
Touch was NOT! a disappointment, in fact it shows that there are real ideas that can blend reality and fantasy. In the days of reality TV that we are all forced to watch, this was a breath of fresh air. Secondly, the subplots are essential in helping the story to blossom. Without it there would be a break in the flow, and we would be lost. It ties itself together well. Unfortunately there are some people who couldn't understand what the writers are trying to accomplish. Understanding the cell tower idea was not complex. This apex of our technology only seems right to have his son "receive" the information through. Or from another perspective, the only place that he can concentrate with all of the world trying to say that he is handicapped instead of understanding him. There is no reason to review this show poorly. It was a cinematic masterpiece. It took elements from real life and fantasy and made a story line that is amazing and promotes acceptance of people who are different from what we see in every day life. Who wouldn't want to have discovered something so amazing inside a child who seemed "hopeless". If you didn't really enjoy this show than you have lost your sense of mystery. It shows that you would rather open a puzzle box with the puzzle already finished than to discover the picture underneath.
79 out of 110 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Pleasantly surprised
krypter9927 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
When I first heard Kiefer Sutherland was coming back to our small screen. I thought action, guns and explosions. That's what he's been typecast as over his years as Jack Bauer.

For me anyway.

When I first saw the trailer I was sceptical. I mean how many of us an admit six times out of ten trailers that are awesome tend to be quite disappointing features. Well this is not the case for Touch.

--spoilers below--

It takes an interesting idea about how everyone is connected which seems familiar but it's done rather intuitively. While you may get a sense of lost and other mystery shows I have to say that's not a bad thing. The story advances quite fast and if you don't know what the actors (mainly Danny Glover to piles on a truck load of mumbo jumbo in an amazing few minutes of acting) are on about you may get confused at mention of terms like Fibonacci sequence and quantum entanglement.

If you understand the terminology behind it, it becomes much more interesting. I was aware of every theory they talked about in the show and it made it quite interesting.

The acting was very well done for a TV show I must say. Kiefer never fails to impress, the young British man who lost his phone (long story) could have been terrible but the actor pulled it off amazingly. Kiefers son also plays the child prophet???? And it was nice to see Danny Glover again.

Ain't' he getting to old for this...you get the point.

Only person I was iffy on was the welfare worker. While she was not bad she seemed to overact a tad but I'm sure she will get it down pat.

All in all Touch left me wanting to watch more which has not happened with a Pilot in many years.

It might not be you're cup of tea with all the technobabble or people who can't handle outlandish stories.

But if you like a mix of suspense, family drama, possible romance and real life drama.

Touch is for you.

Thanks for reading my first movie review. Hope you still have you're sanity.
30 out of 51 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Down hill
yoshiandtamiko18 April 2012
I can understand why this show has an 83/100 score currently. But I think its gonna end up at around 6 or even 5 if they continue to go in the direction they are going recently.

I just saw the kite episode and found so many thing annoying. When I finished watching with my wife, we looked at each other and the first thing she said was, this was the worst thing she has seen in a long time. At first, I couldn't pinpoint what it was. Well besides the obvious.

Kiefer Sutherland's acting is horrible. He over acts. He is constantly chasing his kid around acting like a moron. Then it always comes to this realization moment where he says, "oh, i see. this is what the kid is trying to say."

I'm getting tired of this formula. Also, suspension of belief needs to be exercised, but I'm just too tired to utilize those muscles for this premise.

I understand the excitement for a show based on some super power kid that can see things nobody else sees but, this is just too much to grasp.

Right now, the best part of the show is the intro song and imagery. I think every episode should have a moment where the boy sees these patterns. Something to ground things on some foundation. But right now, its just him running around aimlessly, but not really. With daddy following him around.

For example, when the boy and the father were in that guys house and the boy was looking at the rose, I think that moment would have been nice to show his perspective of the rose and to then superimpose some sort of white lines or graphical element to show what he sees in that rose and how it is constructed. Like they did with A Beautiful Mind where the main character would look at the world and he would see these patterns emerge as glowing elements. These sort of moments would help me, feel like all this isn't some sort of bad writing chance but rather something that could actually happen in reality.

That's all i have to say about that.

Yoshi
13 out of 24 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
"Touch" Will Touch You
brent_a_graham28 January 2012
If you love "Fringe" fantasy, you'll love "Touch".

If you love heart warming drama, you'll love "Touch".

And even if you just love seeing Jack Bauer being afraid of heights, you'll love "Touch".

Granted, this review is based on just what I saw in the first episode, but if that is any indication of the future episodes, we are in for a real treat!

Brilliant writing, solid acting (except for the social worker), and a compelling glimpse into what the human condition could be. It all adds up to a ground-breaking show that will capture our attention just as the last show Kiefer was in did.
145 out of 221 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
Nice start but nothing new
wirfilmfan3 April 2012
It's very hard to separate "24" from Kiefer Sutherland. Every time he says "please" in Ep. 1 or maybe later he'll say "I beg you", it will always remind me to the mighty Jack Bauer.

It feels like watching "24", Mercury Rising (1998) and Crash (2004) combined. Oh I forgot to mention Heroes.

The linking of the characters is very similar to that in Crash. The kid with the ability is similar to Mercury Rising, but I prefer David Mazouz and Kiefer Sutherland's acting performance than Miko Hughes and Bruce Willis'. And the cinematography is "Heroes"-looks.

Joining all together, i can't say it's an ugly story. However i hope that it will get better and better in the upcoming episodes.
6 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
TOUCH is the kind of show that could go on for years to come.
TOUCH is one of the best TV shows I have seen in a long while. So many completely different stories taking us around the world and weaving it all together in a heart wrenching and wonderful way.

Drama and action mixed with tear jerking emotion. Don't miss a minute of it. I was riveted right to the very end. I cannot wait for the next episode to see what can happen next. The writing is ingenious and put together with absolute perfection. The acting, of course, was exactly what we have come to expect from such as Keifer Sutherland. I would highly recommend TOUCH to everyone who enjoys good television. Give me more please!
127 out of 193 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Great start - sharp decline..
robadam-364-2836338 May 2012
An autistic child, a struggling windowed father, a beautiful social worker, and a far-fetched but clever theory revolving around numbers.

The series has a good set of ingredients, so why is it after 5 episodes I'm struggling to bother watching it? The pilot was excellent; David Mazouz is quite the young actor, the plot was developed at a steady pace, and the twists culminated in some heart-warming stuff. I'm a fan of Titus Welliver (the lottery winner) who appears in the pilot and in Episode Four. I like the producers' fearless forays abroad so far, with a good portion of sub-titled drama happening everywhere from Japan to the Middle East to Africa and on to Canada.

But Kiefer Sutherland is just plain awful. His constantly breathy dialogue delivery is annoying. His rather wimpish lines and lost demeanour are totally at odds with him jumping in front of loaded guns and talking men off high bridges. I've lost count of the number of scenes which have him running after his errant son alternately whispering, shouting and pleading "Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake, Jake".

Danny Glover isn't much better. As a foil to Gibson's nutty Lethal Weapon cop, he was perfect. In Touch, he looks more like a half-wired ex-boxer who can't speak above a whisper.

Still, there's entertainment in trying to work out which of the initial clips' characters will affect which other. Some you can see coming. Others are straight out of left field.

I'll keep watching. But I really wish Sutherland would stop sucking air like a bicycle pump just before he delivers a line.
4 out of 7 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
5/10
High concept badly conceived
SnoopyStyle22 September 2013
Martin Bohm (Kiefer Sutherland) lost his wife in the twin towers on 9-11. He used to be a newspaper journalist, but he's struggling with his life especially his autistic son Jake. Jake is a mute, but he seems to be doing something with numbers that is foretelling events that hasn't happened.

There is a high concept interesting idea, but it's a tiring show. Kiefer is ALWAYS out of breath, always chasing after the kid. It's all too repetitive. The other stories related to the main show are sometimes interesting. They don't always work and they don't really advance the main story. That's probably why that structure was eventually dropped. The second season was a feeble attempt to try to continue a failing show.
11 out of 11 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Epic
swapniljain151129 January 2012
This pilot has to definitely be the second best pilot ever followed after the Sherlock Pilot.Insane, I mean once the episode had passed certain events I was just in a total awe the way those certain events all got connected to one final event.A must must must watch especially to all Jack Bauer fans and really looking forward to the rest of the season and hoping that it will be as mind-blowing as the pilot. Superb acting, awesome pilot story. Looking like a thrilling ride undoubtedly. The concept is just amazing, its full of surprises. Surely a sitcom that I will be following and will insist others also to have a look at the pilot and be ready to be amazed.
91 out of 140 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Annoying father's acting ruined the TV show for me
greenleader23 February 2013
I watched the first series with enthusiasm and interest.

I've grown annoyed by father's character. As it grows, I can't see nothing more than an unintelligent soul in his father who can't grasp he should do what his son commands.

I am getting so annoyed by this character I can't watch it anymore. Almost every episode turns around father chasing son's ghosts and wondering if he should follow the son even though so many times the son proved his miraculous leadership.

I can recommend this to patient people who are not afraid to watch bad characters in action. Scenarist is showing us that people are distrustful to miracles and "chosen" children. Any character that meets the boy does not trust him for too much time.

It's good show, just give more hope and faith to characters. Thanks
3 out of 5 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Proving to be really bad...
anonym_0329 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
First, the good:

  • The premise is OK.


  • They have people from other countries that actually speak their own native language.


  • Looks like good production values.


  • Nice intro music.


Then the bad:

  • The show is in reality about a kid with super powers, but they try to give it a reasonable explanation, and make it scientific by including numbers. Just using random numbers every episode doesn't explain anything. One thing is saying that the kid sees patterns in nature that others don't. OK. But this makes him able to predict human actions, choices and the future? Not so much.


  • The plot is weak. I mean really weak. Each episode has a very bad story with cheap coincidences, but they make you buy them because some number is present every time. And it's fate.


  • After a while you learn that the kid is hurting because of some unbalanced equation in the universe (the Matrix Revolutions?). But the things that hurt him are mundane. Here are two examples from one of the last episodes: (1) A lesbian couple is tying to have a baby, but one of them doesn't really want to because of her carrier. (2) A man wants to do something that matters, but he just made it so that an old building can be demolished for profit. These are the great pains in the universe? How about wars, poverty, child abuse, torture or slavery? Those things don't hurt him, but a father and a daughter that don't talk much do? I don't buy that!


  • Even though the show tries to be international it's still awfully American. Removing the 9/11 and Iraq themes would have made it more acceptable. Google "Blowback".


  • Kiefer Sutherland overacts. I liked him in 24, he's terrible in this show. He's constantly panting. Even though he's standing still. And in every episode he says "Jake!" at least 100 times. It gets annoying after only a few episodes.


  • The show has too many plot lines simultaneously. Like it has short attention span and constantly needs something new. But then it loses the overall plot to drive the series from episode to episode, except the "pain of the universe"-theme, mentioned above.


And finally the verdict:

Touch tries too hard and fails. It's not about super powers, though it includes them. It's not about mathematics or science, though it wants to. It's not a good drama, because most people only appear for one episode, and the ones that don't have zero character development. And it's not a thriller, because the most thrilling thing each episode is spotting a number somewhere so it all makes sense. So in the end what is it really all about? I say it's about fate. And that makes it a really bad show!
71 out of 103 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Great T.V.
gcarole892 February 2012
I thoroughly enjoyed the preview of Touch! Love the mystery and suspense of watching the story unfold! Supports my theory of our actions(even though we may not know it) directly affecting someone else! The actors are believable. I mean I could really feel the father's pain in both losing his wife and not being able to communicate with his son. We need more t.v. shows that focus on the more caring/spiritual side of life. Someone made the comment that it was similar to Person of Interest, and what's wrong with that. We have tons of "Real Housewives" and "wives" of various genres of sports personalities. What's wrong with more thought-provoking, insightful series like Person of Interest and Touch? I want more!!!!
36 out of 55 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
Touch is a "Must See"
jstdawnee-183-96990228 January 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Slight spoiler:

I admit, I'm generally skeptical when previews are "too good." However, in this instance, "Touch" did not disappoint, nor did the previews give everything away. Tim Kring has a phenomenal ability to tie together multiple story-lines creating an intricate web that surprised me and left me heavyhearted and delighted by the end of the pilot. I am so used to seeing Kiefer Sutherland in his Jack Baur role that I was sure I wouldn't be able to separate him from that character. I was wrong. His portrayal as Martin Bohm, the father of a young seemingly non-communicative boy was exceptional. Danny Glover added a great "Touch" to the episode and the story left me wanting more.
17 out of 29 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Should've been a movie not series
qrpilot24 March 2013
I've watched half of season one. I'm not sure if I will watch the rest of the season/ series unless I have absolutely nothing better to do. Don't get me wrong, I mean I like the series and I think the idea and concept of the show is totally original and interesting, BUT....

After the series pilot which I though was brilliant and capturing, it became evident on the second episode that the show is going to struggle to live up to the same standards or level of Intrigue of the pilot. As the show looses a lot of surprise and mysteries after the pilot, the show mostly and heavily relies on the writers and their creativity and ability to keep the show interesting and captivating with new ideas and plots. This unfortunately would only take you so far before the show stars to be predictable and routine.

For those reasons, I believe this should have been a movie. It would have made a very good one even with the same cast, crew, writers etc... It's still very good, but unfortunately loses momentum. Overall I give it 6 out of 10.
2 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
9/10
Surprised
Fbh9129 January 2012
I wasn't expecting much from this show but I have to say that the pilot episode was a big, pleasant surprise. The concept of predicting the future isn't new but I found it pleasant to be applied in a different way than "save the world", the acting was quite good (though it takes some time to get used at the fact that the man you see on screen is not Jack Bauer) and at least this first episode had great production values showing location all over the world and making them feel quite real (and spoken in their original language). As far as the "connected stories" go I think they where well done and managed the same emotional impact in 45 movies as movies that take 2 hours to have the same effect.

I think it's too soon to call this show a success. The first episode was fantastic but I'm not sure if they will be able to maintain the same quality and engagement during the whole season. I would like this to turn into a big story rather than the "weekly connected story adventure". Still, you should at least watch this episode, even if the show doesn't manage to maintain it's quality this first episode is good enough to be recommended on its own
46 out of 74 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
Mr Kim Tring tries again. Same issues as his previous work..
tom-29791 December 2018
Warning: Spoilers
Kim Tring, creator of heroes, strikes again with the same issues.

Heroes started off promising, interesting and with a great central theme or 'MacGuffin' for all characters to chase after.. then, I don't know what happened but it just fell apart. The show was cancelled, but love for it obviously brought it back as 'Heroes Reborn'.

Here, the same thing seems to happen. There is a lot of time wasting with voiceovers about 'fate' and pseudo philosophical twaddle.. then the formula starts. The boy writes some numbers, Keifer goes on a quest to help someone out.. its like the A Team + Quantum Leap + Numbers.

Then the writers seems to sort of give up on effort, coast for a while, play the hand theyve been holding back - Amelia, Child Protection Services and the algorithm.. then, the first series ends.

Its .. okay.. its watchable.. but it's really difficult to binge watch because if I hear the words 'Buddy' or 'Jake' one more time, I'm going to scream. As the boy doesn't talk, the father has to talk AT him using those two nicknames for him over and over and over.. And its clearly for the audience as you would have thought as the boy doesn't speak, talking to him is completely pointless by now.

If you want Autism.. try the Good Doctor. Its more realistic. This is interesting, but its too magic/pseudo science for my taste.. either go ALL OUT with magic, super powers and stuff.. this ambiguous nonsense about it being part of Gods plan and all the religious Jewish Hokum doesn't do it any favours at all.
1 out of 1 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
Wow.
jennipe5 February 2012
Unique, nothing like it, from the starting sequence to the surprise twists it contains beauty yet does not "contain" it's wildness, it surprise. Makes me feel like TV has finally become what it can be. Wordless boy in a number based world helps viewers imagine paths and links beyond the circumference of their lives, I am sure that it will become challenging for the writers and creators to keep to this freshness, but I feel honoured to watch this primordial episode which is so unique in the current world of television viewing. Keifer Sullivan is always a pleasure to watch, but the other pleasures include the passage of story lines across the globe and into moments that deepen unexpectedly in to despair and then unexpected webs of connection. Yet stays away from glib. It is hard to create a series that match the apocalyptic pulse of our times without descending to the fear pulse that is so often used to either sell or stabilize the appeal of the dramatic content. Tremendously creative photography, editing, directing and script.
35 out of 62 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
6/10
OK, but it's a wait-see
ctomvelu124 March 2012
Not to be confused with the Elmore Leonard novel and its movie version, this TOUCH is about a dad and his autistic son. The son can put numbers together in a way to predict future events. Dad gloms onto this fact, and uses that knowledge to help people. Keifer Southerland of "24" fame is the dad. "24" had a gimmick, and so does this show, in that the kid's efforts affect people o a worldwide scale. So we cut to people and events all round the globe. Well written, but too gimmicky for my taste. We'll see how it goes over time. I must admit I was never a "24" fan, although I do like Sutherland well enough. And you have seen this before: Remember a movie called "Mercury Rising" with Bruce Willis? How about "Knowing" with Nic Cage?
3 out of 6 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
2/10
Good idea for a movie, not for a TV series
Fernando85748324 March 2012
Warning: Spoilers
Unlike most people here I watch several episodes before I make up my mind about a TV series or movie.

But with Touch it's very clear: the concept so brilliantly presented in the first episode already falls apart in the second episode.

The magic and the big surprise from episode 1 are gone in episode 2. We already know that the kid has some special power to link people and locations together to help someone by the end of the episode.

And where this concept was presented delicately in episode 1, it has been done over the top in episode 2. Martin Bohm only seems to be shouting at his son: 'What do you mean with this? What do you mean with that?'

You already know that you have to just sit and wait for the end result at the end, you already know that most of the characters you start with in the beginning will be connected, yada yada yada. There will be no surprise, so it's utterly boring.

Another (lesser) mistake in episode 2 is the role of Clea Hopkins (Gugu Mbatha-Raw). Yes, she is still really pretty, but she doesn't add anything to the story and could have been easily replaced by anyone else. So no character building there.

Furthermore, in the first episode Clea Hopkins understood the kid special situation in the end, so why take ten steps back and be the annoying woman from child protective services?

And then the kid. I believed him in the first episode, but in the second he just looks and acts too much like a normal kid. It doesn't help that he talks to the audience in a voice over at the beginning of the episode. So he can talk?! And he knows it's strange that he never said a word?! So basically there is no reason for him not to speak? Urgh.

The concept for Touch's episode 1 is great, brilliant even, but is only suitable for a movie. If Tim Kring keeps repeating this same formula for every next episode he will be in for a treat.

The right thing to do here is to simply create new concepts within the magical universe of episode 1. Surprise me.
60 out of 91 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
10/10
TOUCH
mamacita-6118711 February 2019
Don't understand whenever there is a wholesome TV Series that does not include violence, nudity, or sexual dalliances, it is considered not TV worthy. What about those of us who have really enjoyed the series. I'm sure I do not stand alone on this. Please bring it back touch with Keifer Sutherland. Love his series, 24, Designated Survivor and Touch.
3 out of 3 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
7/10
By the numbers
petergdownload29 January 2012
In short a great pilot, although I'm left worried that this series will become yet another show that has little place to go after pouring all its creative energy into its first episode. Are we now left with little more than a by the numbers adventure of the week? Touch's premise that everything is connected (and we get to see the dots being joined up) is 'mumbo jumbo' explained by Danny Glover early on and I can't see it being revisited again other than in the opening credits each week. Replace "Fibonacci Sequence" with "Super Computer" and in many ways you end up with "Person of Interest", although Touch does have a few interesting central characters at least.

If Touch can continue to keep us caring about its main and episodic characters (even with a bit of blatant emotional manipulation every now and again) then it might go the distance. But I suspect most viewers will have formed a solid opinion by episode three either way.

Regards
9 out of 27 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
1/10
Manufactured Coincidences via dartboard story boarding
philquiram15 April 2012
Warning: Spoilers
This is how I see a writing session of this show. Put a bunch of writers in a room, with a series of dartboards. Lets say there are 5 dartboards :

The 1st just has random numbers all over it. (12, 555 5555, 12345, 454 etc)

The 2nd has a series of objects that might be On a person. (tattoo, wallet, phone, clothes, jewelry, watch, etc)

The 3rd a series of objects that are just objects (A door, a bus,a bill board, a house number, a phone number, a book etc)

The 4th peoples relations to each other (mother, brother, husband, wife, friend etc)

The 5th is a list of countries. (Japan, Iraq, Liberia, USA etc)

Sprinkle in some 9/11 stuff.

They give the writers a bunch of darts, they throw them, and the episode writes itself. EXAMPLE 12, watch, door number , husband, Iraq.

The kid (jake) writes down the number 12 a thousand times in his notebook. Keifer looks at his watch and sees that it is 12:12. He realizes they are late for an appointment at the hospital. Upon arriving at the hospital Jake runs away and finds a door in the hospital with a 12 on it. The man inside, a john doe, is in a coma. For some reason they are unable to identify the man, maybe his face was blown off. Maybe he was in Iraq. The episode ends with Keifer reuniting him with his Wife, who thought he was dead. Maybe he wakes up at 12 o'clock.

Doesn't that seem like a plausible episode of the show ? And it took me less than 5 minutes to write.
84 out of 133 found this helpful. Was this review helpful? Sign in to vote.
Permalink
An error has occured. Please try again.

See also

Awards | FAQ | User Ratings | External Reviews | Metacritic Reviews


Recently Viewed